{"title":"Discussing Style with Ghosts: Aesthetics and Haunting in the Age of Historicism","authors":"Julian Blunk","doi":"10.1080/00043389.2021.1968630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In the age of historicism, stylistic choices were simultaneously projections of identity. At the same time, the idea that the recovery of a historic style would also resurrect the “spirit” of a particular era represented both the supreme hope and the greatest fear of historicism. Ghosts therefore acted as figures of memory who were summoned as correctives of current conceptions of history, and who call attention to their own (often forgotten) stories. The neo-styles themselves were either discredited or legitimised as the undead ghosts of their reference styles. With reference to Johann Wolfgang von Goethe's “Von Deutscher Baukunst” (On German Architecture) (Berliner Ausgabe. Kunsttheoretische Schriften und Übersetzungen 20 ([1772] 1960): 28–38) and other texts, the article demonstrates that (metaphorical) consultations with ghosts represented attempts to close gaps in the historical research while “clarifying” unresolved questions of cultural inheritance.","PeriodicalId":40908,"journal":{"name":"De Arte","volume":"56 1","pages":"71 - 81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"De Arte","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00043389.2021.1968630","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract In the age of historicism, stylistic choices were simultaneously projections of identity. At the same time, the idea that the recovery of a historic style would also resurrect the “spirit” of a particular era represented both the supreme hope and the greatest fear of historicism. Ghosts therefore acted as figures of memory who were summoned as correctives of current conceptions of history, and who call attention to their own (often forgotten) stories. The neo-styles themselves were either discredited or legitimised as the undead ghosts of their reference styles. With reference to Johann Wolfgang von Goethe's “Von Deutscher Baukunst” (On German Architecture) (Berliner Ausgabe. Kunsttheoretische Schriften und Übersetzungen 20 ([1772] 1960): 28–38) and other texts, the article demonstrates that (metaphorical) consultations with ghosts represented attempts to close gaps in the historical research while “clarifying” unresolved questions of cultural inheritance.
摘要在历史决定主义时代,文体选择同时也是身份的投射。同时,一种历史风格的恢复也会复活特定时代的“精神”的想法代表了历史主义的最高希望和最大恐惧。因此,鬼魂扮演了记忆的角色,被召唤来纠正当前的历史观念,并唤起人们对他们自己(经常被遗忘)故事的关注。新风格本身要么被抹黑,要么被合法化为其参考风格中的不死鬼。参考Johann Wolfgang von Goethe的“von Deutscher Baukunst”(德国建筑论)(Berliner Ausgabe.Kunsttheoretische Schriften undÜbersetzungen 20([1772]1960):28-38)和其他文本,这篇文章表明,与鬼魂的(隐喻性的)磋商代表着试图在澄清文化传承问题的同时,填补历史研究的空白。