Discussing Style with Ghosts: Aesthetics and Haunting in the Age of Historicism

IF 0.1 0 ART De Arte Pub Date : 2021-01-02 DOI:10.1080/00043389.2021.1968630
Julian Blunk
{"title":"Discussing Style with Ghosts: Aesthetics and Haunting in the Age of Historicism","authors":"Julian Blunk","doi":"10.1080/00043389.2021.1968630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In the age of historicism, stylistic choices were simultaneously projections of identity. At the same time, the idea that the recovery of a historic style would also resurrect the “spirit” of a particular era represented both the supreme hope and the greatest fear of historicism. Ghosts therefore acted as figures of memory who were summoned as correctives of current conceptions of history, and who call attention to their own (often forgotten) stories. The neo-styles themselves were either discredited or legitimised as the undead ghosts of their reference styles. With reference to Johann Wolfgang von Goethe's “Von Deutscher Baukunst” (On German Architecture) (Berliner Ausgabe. Kunsttheoretische Schriften und Übersetzungen 20 ([1772] 1960): 28–38) and other texts, the article demonstrates that (metaphorical) consultations with ghosts represented attempts to close gaps in the historical research while “clarifying” unresolved questions of cultural inheritance.","PeriodicalId":40908,"journal":{"name":"De Arte","volume":"56 1","pages":"71 - 81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"De Arte","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00043389.2021.1968630","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract In the age of historicism, stylistic choices were simultaneously projections of identity. At the same time, the idea that the recovery of a historic style would also resurrect the “spirit” of a particular era represented both the supreme hope and the greatest fear of historicism. Ghosts therefore acted as figures of memory who were summoned as correctives of current conceptions of history, and who call attention to their own (often forgotten) stories. The neo-styles themselves were either discredited or legitimised as the undead ghosts of their reference styles. With reference to Johann Wolfgang von Goethe's “Von Deutscher Baukunst” (On German Architecture) (Berliner Ausgabe. Kunsttheoretische Schriften und Übersetzungen 20 ([1772] 1960): 28–38) and other texts, the article demonstrates that (metaphorical) consultations with ghosts represented attempts to close gaps in the historical research while “clarifying” unresolved questions of cultural inheritance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以鬼论风格:历史主义时代的美学与幽灵
摘要在历史决定主义时代,文体选择同时也是身份的投射。同时,一种历史风格的恢复也会复活特定时代的“精神”的想法代表了历史主义的最高希望和最大恐惧。因此,鬼魂扮演了记忆的角色,被召唤来纠正当前的历史观念,并唤起人们对他们自己(经常被遗忘)故事的关注。新风格本身要么被抹黑,要么被合法化为其参考风格中的不死鬼。参考Johann Wolfgang von Goethe的“von Deutscher Baukunst”(德国建筑论)(Berliner Ausgabe.Kunsttheoretische Schriften undÜbersetzungen 20([1772]1960):28-38)和其他文本,这篇文章表明,与鬼魂的(隐喻性的)磋商代表着试图在澄清文化传承问题的同时,填补历史研究的空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
De Arte
De Arte ART-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
The Horizontal Sublime in Post-apartheid Gothic Landscape I’ll Be Your Mirror: Emma Wolukau-Wanambwa’s Science Fiction of Truth DisOrientations: Thinking through Lines of Desire in the Visual Artwork of Jordache A. Ellapen “Africanness” in the Oeuvre of the Ceramist Esias Bosch (1923–2010) Diane Victor: Estampes, Dessins, Suie / Prints, Drawings, Smoke Diane Victor: Estampes, Dessins, Suie / Prints, Drawings, Smoke , With contributions by Stéphane Laurent, Renaud Faroux, Karen von Veh, and Francis van der Riet, Mare et Martin. 2022. pp. 244, ISBN: 9782362220807
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1