{"title":"ESTRATEGIAS COGNITIVO-EMOCIONALES Y DENSIDAD ARGUMENTATIVA","authors":"Cristian Noemi, Rosalía Iglesias","doi":"10.4067/S0718-48832019000100161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanolEl trabajo procura establecer si los modos con los que un sujeto se enfrenta cognitiva y emocionalmente con la realidad estan relacionados con su conducta linguistica expresada en terminos de densidad argumentativa. A fin de establecer cuales son las principales estrategias cognitivo-emocionales empleadas por los sujetos de la muestra, se empleo el test Moldes (Hernandez, 2010). Para evaluar la densidad discursiva argumentativa se utilizo el Dilema III del Cuestionario D.I.T. (Rest, 2013). El cruce de informacion entre ambos instrumentos permitio establecer que los sujetos de alto rendimiento en el test Moldes mostraron mayor grado de densidad discursiva y viceversa. Los resultados, igualmente, permitieron especificar los tipos de estrategias cognitivo-emocionales que se asocian con mayor o menor densidad discursiva argumentativa. EnglishThe work tries to establish whether the ways in which a subject is confronted cognitively and emotionally with reality are related to their linguistic behavior expressed in terms of argumentative density. In order to establish which are the main cognitive emotional strate gies used by the subjects of the sample, the Moldes test was used (Hernandez, 2010). To assess the argumentative discursive density, the Dilemma III of the Questionnaire D.I.T. (Rest, 2013) was used. The crossing of information between both instruments allowed to establish that the subjects of high performance in the Molds test showed a greater degree of discursive density and vice versa. The results also allowed us to specify the types of cognitive emotional strategies that are associated with greater or lesser argumentative discursive density","PeriodicalId":35168,"journal":{"name":"RLA","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RLA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-48832019000100161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
espanolEl trabajo procura establecer si los modos con los que un sujeto se enfrenta cognitiva y emocionalmente con la realidad estan relacionados con su conducta linguistica expresada en terminos de densidad argumentativa. A fin de establecer cuales son las principales estrategias cognitivo-emocionales empleadas por los sujetos de la muestra, se empleo el test Moldes (Hernandez, 2010). Para evaluar la densidad discursiva argumentativa se utilizo el Dilema III del Cuestionario D.I.T. (Rest, 2013). El cruce de informacion entre ambos instrumentos permitio establecer que los sujetos de alto rendimiento en el test Moldes mostraron mayor grado de densidad discursiva y viceversa. Los resultados, igualmente, permitieron especificar los tipos de estrategias cognitivo-emocionales que se asocian con mayor o menor densidad discursiva argumentativa. EnglishThe work tries to establish whether the ways in which a subject is confronted cognitively and emotionally with reality are related to their linguistic behavior expressed in terms of argumentative density. In order to establish which are the main cognitive emotional strate gies used by the subjects of the sample, the Moldes test was used (Hernandez, 2010). To assess the argumentative discursive density, the Dilemma III of the Questionnaire D.I.T. (Rest, 2013) was used. The crossing of information between both instruments allowed to establish that the subjects of high performance in the Molds test showed a greater degree of discursive density and vice versa. The results also allowed us to specify the types of cognitive emotional strategies that are associated with greater or lesser argumentative discursive density