Negotiating Indigenous higher education policy analysis at the cultural interface in the Northern Territory, Australia

IF 4 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Critical Studies in Education Pub Date : 2022-06-05 DOI:10.1080/17508487.2022.2083647
C. Street, K. Robertson, J. Smith, J. Guenther, S. Larkin, S. Motlap, W. Ludwig, T. Woodroffe, K. Gillan, R. Ober, V. Shannon, E. Maypilama
{"title":"Negotiating Indigenous higher education policy analysis at the cultural interface in the Northern Territory, Australia","authors":"C. Street, K. Robertson, J. Smith, J. Guenther, S. Larkin, S. Motlap, W. Ludwig, T. Woodroffe, K. Gillan, R. Ober, V. Shannon, E. Maypilama","doi":"10.1080/17508487.2022.2083647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Policy analysis can be useful for learning about ‘what works’ in policy. Contemporary policy studies literature highlight that such learning is influenced by power relations in government that shape our ways of knowing the world. This paper offers a critically reflexive narrative account of power relations present during Indigenous higher education policy analysis research conducted in the Northern Territory (NT), Australia to shed light on how to effectively negotiate policy analysis. We reflect on tensions that arose by applying Nakata’s concept of the ‘cultural interface’, which accounts for the complexity of meaning making across diverse knowledge spaces. Narratives from an Indigenous Project Reference Group member are included to provide a perspective on these tensions from an Indigenous standpoint. The paper concludes by describing enabling conditions and strategies that were necessary for effective policy analysis, and considers implications for Indigenous higher education policy analysis in the NT.","PeriodicalId":47434,"journal":{"name":"Critical Studies in Education","volume":"64 1","pages":"250 - 266"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Studies in Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2022.2083647","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Policy analysis can be useful for learning about ‘what works’ in policy. Contemporary policy studies literature highlight that such learning is influenced by power relations in government that shape our ways of knowing the world. This paper offers a critically reflexive narrative account of power relations present during Indigenous higher education policy analysis research conducted in the Northern Territory (NT), Australia to shed light on how to effectively negotiate policy analysis. We reflect on tensions that arose by applying Nakata’s concept of the ‘cultural interface’, which accounts for the complexity of meaning making across diverse knowledge spaces. Narratives from an Indigenous Project Reference Group member are included to provide a perspective on these tensions from an Indigenous standpoint. The paper concludes by describing enabling conditions and strategies that were necessary for effective policy analysis, and considers implications for Indigenous higher education policy analysis in the NT.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
就澳大利亚北领地文化界面上的土著高等教育政策分析进行谈判
政策分析对于了解政策中“什么是有效的”是有用的。当代政策研究文献强调,这种学习受到政府权力关系的影响,而权力关系塑造了我们认识世界的方式。本文对在澳大利亚北领地(NT)进行的土著高等教育政策分析研究中存在的权力关系进行了批判性的反思性叙述,以阐明如何有效地谈判政策分析。我们反思了应用中田的“文化界面”概念所产生的紧张关系,该概念解释了跨越不同知识空间的意义制造的复杂性。来自土著项目参考小组成员的叙述包括从土著立场提供对这些紧张局势的看法。论文最后描述了有效政策分析所必需的有利条件和战略,并考虑了对北部地区土著高等教育政策分析的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Studies in Education
Critical Studies in Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
5.10%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Critical Studies in Education is one of the few international journals devoted to a critical sociology of education, although it welcomes submissions with a critical stance that draw on other disciplines (e.g. philosophy, social geography, history) in order to understand ''the social''. Two interests frame the journal’s critical approach to research: (1) who benefits (and who does not) from current and historical social arrangements in education and, (2) from the standpoint of the least advantaged, what can be done about inequitable arrangements. Informed by this approach, articles published in the journal draw on post-structural, feminist, postcolonial and other critical orientations to critique education systems and to identify alternatives for education policy, practice and research.
期刊最新文献
Public education and teacher professionalism in an age of accountability Queer youth and critical sexuality education pedagogies within networked publics: implications for school-based practice Grappling with wicked problems: teacher professionalism and pedagogical mappings for reparative futures The role of online crisis actors in teachers’ work and lives Beyond conventional critique in education: embracing the affirmative
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1