Innovations in Sampling: Improving the Appropriateness and Quality of Samples in Organizational Research

M. Zickar, Melissa G. Keith
{"title":"Innovations in Sampling: Improving the Appropriateness and Quality of Samples in Organizational Research","authors":"M. Zickar, Melissa G. Keith","doi":"10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-052946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Technology has changed the way that organizational researchers obtain participants for their research studies. Although technology has facilitated the collection of large quantities of data through online platforms, it has also highlighted potential data quality issues for many of our samples. In this article, we review different sampling techniques, including convenience, purposive, probability-based, and snowball sampling. We highlight strengths and weaknesses of each approach to help organizational researchers choose the most appropriate sampling techniques for their research questions. We identify best practices that researchers can use to improve the quality of their samples, including reviewing screening techniques to increase the quality of online sampling. Finally, as part of our review we examined the sampling procedures of all empirical research articles published in Journal of Applied Psychology in the past 5 years, and we use observations from these results to make conclusions about the lack of methodological and sample diversity in organizational research, the overreliance on a few sampling techniques, the need to report key aspects of sampling, and concerns about participant quality. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, Volume 10 is January 2023. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.","PeriodicalId":48019,"journal":{"name":"Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-052946","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Technology has changed the way that organizational researchers obtain participants for their research studies. Although technology has facilitated the collection of large quantities of data through online platforms, it has also highlighted potential data quality issues for many of our samples. In this article, we review different sampling techniques, including convenience, purposive, probability-based, and snowball sampling. We highlight strengths and weaknesses of each approach to help organizational researchers choose the most appropriate sampling techniques for their research questions. We identify best practices that researchers can use to improve the quality of their samples, including reviewing screening techniques to increase the quality of online sampling. Finally, as part of our review we examined the sampling procedures of all empirical research articles published in Journal of Applied Psychology in the past 5 years, and we use observations from these results to make conclusions about the lack of methodological and sample diversity in organizational research, the overreliance on a few sampling techniques, the need to report key aspects of sampling, and concerns about participant quality. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, Volume 10 is January 2023. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抽样创新:提高组织研究样本的适当性和质量
技术改变了组织研究人员获取研究参与者的方式。尽管技术促进了通过在线平台收集大量数据,但它也突出了我们许多样本的潜在数据质量问题。在这篇文章中,我们回顾了不同的采样技术,包括方便性、目的性、基于概率和滚雪球采样。我们强调了每种方法的优势和劣势,以帮助组织研究人员为他们的研究问题选择最合适的抽样技术。我们确定了研究人员可以用来提高样本质量的最佳实践,包括审查筛查技术以提高在线采样的质量。最后,作为我们综述的一部分,我们检查了过去5年中发表在《应用心理学杂志》上的所有实证研究文章的抽样程序,并利用这些结果的观察得出结论,即组织研究中缺乏方法论和样本多样性,过度依赖一些抽样技术,需要报告抽样的关键方面,以及对参与者质量的关注。《组织心理学与组织行为年度评论》第10卷预计最终在线出版日期为2023年1月。请参阅http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates用于修订估算。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
24.20
自引率
2.20%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Launched in March 2014, the Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior is a publication dedicated to reviewing the literature on I/O Psychology and HRM/OB. In the latest edition of the Journal Citation Report (JCR) in 2023, this journal achieved significant recognition. It ranked among the top 5 journals in two categories and boasted an impressive Impact Factor of 13.7.
期刊最新文献
Moral Decision-Making in Organizations How Effective Are Work-Life Balance Policies? The Importance of Inclusion Positive Identity Construction in Diverse Organizations Interpersonal Relationships in Organizations: Building Better Pipes and Looking Through Prisms Elevating Health Significance Post-Pandemic: Is the Employee-Organization Relationship in a Period of Change?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1