In Favor of the 2019 Equality Act: A Comment on Burt

IF 1.8 2区 社会学 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Feminist Criminology Pub Date : 2021-01-27 DOI:10.1177/1557085121991336
S. Mezey
{"title":"In Favor of the 2019 Equality Act: A Comment on Burt","authors":"S. Mezey","doi":"10.1177/1557085121991336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are three reason why I disagree with the author’s premise that 2019 Equality Act disadvantages women by blurring the distinction between sex and gender identity. First, it ignores current legal theory and practice that sex discrimination encompasses gender identity discrimination in federal law; second, it has not made a sufficient case that the Act’s interpretation of sex would harm women; third, it incorrectly assumes gender equality in the workplace can be achieved while sex-segregated spaces remain segregated by biological sex. In sum, revising the Equality Act to exempt women’s spaces would sacrifice the principle of gender equality upon which the Act is based.","PeriodicalId":51587,"journal":{"name":"Feminist Criminology","volume":"16 1","pages":"526 - 531"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1557085121991336","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Feminist Criminology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085121991336","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

There are three reason why I disagree with the author’s premise that 2019 Equality Act disadvantages women by blurring the distinction between sex and gender identity. First, it ignores current legal theory and practice that sex discrimination encompasses gender identity discrimination in federal law; second, it has not made a sufficient case that the Act’s interpretation of sex would harm women; third, it incorrectly assumes gender equality in the workplace can be achieved while sex-segregated spaces remain segregated by biological sex. In sum, revising the Equality Act to exempt women’s spaces would sacrifice the principle of gender equality upon which the Act is based.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
支持2019年平等法案:对伯特的评论
我不同意作者的前提,即2019年平等法案模糊了性别和性别认同之间的区别,使女性处于不利地位,原因有三。首先,它忽略了当前的法律理论和实践,即性别歧视包括联邦法律中的性别认同歧视;其次,它没有充分证明该法对性的解释会伤害妇女;第三,它错误地假设工作场所的性别平等可以实现,而性别隔离的空间仍然被生理性别隔离。总而言之,修改《平等法》以豁免妇女空间将牺牲《平等法》所依据的性别平等原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Feminist Criminology
Feminist Criminology CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
12.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: The main aim of Feminist Criminology is to focus on research related to women, girls and crime. The scope includes research on women working in the criminal justice profession, women as offenders and how they are dealt with in the criminal justice system, women as victims, and theories and tests of theories related to women and crime. The feminist critique of criminology incorporates a perspective that the paths to crime differ for males and females, thus research that uses sex as a control variable often fails to illuminate the factors that predict female criminality. This journal will highlight research that takes a perspective designed to demonstrate the gendered nature of crime and responses to crime.
期刊最新文献
“It’s Just, You Don’t Have a Ride:” Transportation Experiences of Rural Women on Probation “We All Have Power”: Using Photovoice to Document Challenges and Strengths of Lakota Women With Histories of Incarceration “I had Some Memories that Popped up Again From My Childhood:” Perspectives of Incarcerated Women on the Initiation and Continuation of Substance Use Judging the Severity of Intimate Partner Violence Against Women: The Role of Situational Factors and Respondents’ Characteristics in Public Opinion Narrative Resilience Among Formerly Incarcerated Mothers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1