Book Review: Lean Technical Communication: Toward Sustainable Program Innovation by Meredith A. Johnson, W. Michele Simmons, & Patricia Sullivan

IF 1.8 2区 文学 Q3 BUSINESS Journal of Business and Technical Communication Pub Date : 2021-09-08 DOI:10.1177/10506519211021604
M. Faris
{"title":"Book Review: Lean Technical Communication: Toward Sustainable Program Innovation by Meredith A. Johnson, W. Michele Simmons, & Patricia Sullivan","authors":"M. Faris","doi":"10.1177/10506519211021604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lean Technical Communication: Toward Sustainable Program Innovation is a book that every program administrator—whether of an undergraduate technical and professional communication (TPC), a graduate, or first-year writing (FYW) program—should read. As an administrator of an FYW program that serves roughly 3,500 students a semester, I found the book invaluable as I considered sustainability, strategy, and innovation for the program. In Lean Technical Communication, Meredith A. Johnson, W. Michele Simmons, and Patricia Sullivan offer a framework for what they call a lean program—one that is “innovative and disruptive,” responsive to local stakeholders and contingencies, aligned with but also challenging of the priorities of local institutions, sustainable, and strategic (p. xv). The book is divided into two parts: the first (Chapters 1–3) overviews their approach, framework, and principles, and the second (Chapters 4–7) illustrates the application of this framework through case examples. In this review, I largely focus on Part 1, which provides the framework that guides the rest of the book. Chapter 1 serves as a definitional chapter of sorts, explaining the book’s key concepts: disruption, sustainability, resilience, and innovation. Sustainability seems to be the central concept of the four, as the authors stress innovating, disrupting, and responding to challenges in sustainable ways “without compromising the natural environment or ignoring needs of diverse populations” (p. 8). The rest of the book shows that a program is sustainable when its central goals and Book Review","PeriodicalId":46414,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business and Technical Communication","volume":"35 1","pages":"508 - 511"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business and Technical Communication","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10506519211021604","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lean Technical Communication: Toward Sustainable Program Innovation is a book that every program administrator—whether of an undergraduate technical and professional communication (TPC), a graduate, or first-year writing (FYW) program—should read. As an administrator of an FYW program that serves roughly 3,500 students a semester, I found the book invaluable as I considered sustainability, strategy, and innovation for the program. In Lean Technical Communication, Meredith A. Johnson, W. Michele Simmons, and Patricia Sullivan offer a framework for what they call a lean program—one that is “innovative and disruptive,” responsive to local stakeholders and contingencies, aligned with but also challenging of the priorities of local institutions, sustainable, and strategic (p. xv). The book is divided into two parts: the first (Chapters 1–3) overviews their approach, framework, and principles, and the second (Chapters 4–7) illustrates the application of this framework through case examples. In this review, I largely focus on Part 1, which provides the framework that guides the rest of the book. Chapter 1 serves as a definitional chapter of sorts, explaining the book’s key concepts: disruption, sustainability, resilience, and innovation. Sustainability seems to be the central concept of the four, as the authors stress innovating, disrupting, and responding to challenges in sustainable ways “without compromising the natural environment or ignoring needs of diverse populations” (p. 8). The rest of the book shows that a program is sustainable when its central goals and Book Review
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Meredith A.Johnson、W.Michele Simmons和Patricia Sullivan的书评:精益技术交流:走向可持续项目创新
《精益技术交流:迈向可持续项目创新》是一本每个项目管理人员都应该阅读的书,无论是本科技术和专业交流(TPC)、研究生还是第一年写作(FYW)项目的管理人员。作为FYW项目的管理者,我发现这本书非常宝贵,因为我考虑了项目的可持续性、战略和创新。该项目每学期为大约3500名学生提供服务。在精益技术沟通,梅雷迪思a .约翰逊,W.米歇尔·西蒙斯,和帕特里夏·沙利文提供了一个框架,他们称之为精益计划,一个是“创新和破坏性的,”响应当地利益相关者和突发事件,与当地机构的优先事项,可持续和战略(第xv页)对齐,但也挑战。这本书分为两个部分:第一章(第1-3章)概述了他们的方法、框架和原则,第二章(第4-7章)通过案例说明了这个框架的应用。在这篇综述中,我主要关注第1部分,它提供了指导本书其余部分的框架。第1章是某种意义上的定义章,解释了本书的关键概念:破坏、可持续性、弹性和创新。可持续性似乎是这四个项目的核心概念,因为作者强调以可持续的方式创新、破坏和应对挑战,“不损害自然环境或忽视不同人群的需求”(第8页)。书的其余部分表明,当一个项目的中心目标和书评时,它是可持续的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
18.20%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: JBTC is a refereed journal that provides a forum for discussion of communication practices, problems, and trends in business, professional, scientific, and governmental fields. As such, JBTC offers opportunities for bridging dichotomies that have traditionally existed in professional communication journals between business and technical communication and between industrial and academic audiences. Because JBTC is designed to disseminate knowledge that can lead to improved communication practices in both academe and industry, the journal favors research that will inform professional communicators in both sectors. However, articles addressing one sector or the other will also be considered.
期刊最新文献
Automating Research in Business and Technical Communication: Large Language Models as Qualitative Coders Using Generative AI to Facilitate Data Analysis and Visualization: A Case Study of Olympic Athletes On the Current Moment in AI: Introduction to Special Issue on Effects of Artificial Intelligence Tools in Technical Communication Pedagogy, Practice, and Research, Part 1 Comparing Student and Writing Instructor Perceptions of Academic Dishonesty When Collaborators Are Artificial Intelligence or Human Preparing Future Technical Editors for an Artificial Intelligence-enabled Workplace
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1