The Elusiveness of Equal Access to Educational Opportunity: Scotland, After a Decade of Inclusive Policies.

Jane Adam, J. I’anson
{"title":"The Elusiveness of Equal Access to Educational Opportunity: Scotland, After a Decade of Inclusive Policies.","authors":"Jane Adam, J. I’anson","doi":"10.1163/27730840-05201004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The achievement of equal access to educational opportunity is an international policy imperative that remains as elusive as it is desirable. Despite a plethora of inclusive policies and initiatives in Scotland such as Getting it Right for Every Child (2008 & 2012), Curriculum for Excellence (2009) and the Scottish Attainment Challenge (2015), significant numbers of young people cannot be said to experience equal access to educational opportunity. This paper draws upon complementary sociological and philosophical perspectives to explore why such barriers to equality of educational opportunity persist, before suggesting ways in which serious engagement with such theory might counter deficit assumptions in play and offer possible new ways forward.\nThe point of departure is Bourdieu’s typology of various forms of social capital which highlights how possession of capital is advantageous to upper and middle class families, whereas lack of such capital serves to restrict educational opportunities for young people from working class and disadvantaged backgrounds. Such an analysis argues that reproduction of social conditions, styles of thinking and decision-making, coupled with oppressive societal structures, all serve to disempower young people and impact negatively upon their educational attainment.\nThis paper explores a variety of ways in which theory might challenge and interrupt assumptions informing discourses associated with inequality and their associated remedies. Through engaging a series of problematics within current framings of inequality, the paper argues that a more sustained engagement with theory offers the possibility of more nuanced understandings of inequality and a provocation to imagine otherwise. Engaging in such imaginative work might, moreover, enable the barriers to equality of educational opportunity to be better addressed.","PeriodicalId":82681,"journal":{"name":"Scottish educational review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scottish educational review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/27730840-05201004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The achievement of equal access to educational opportunity is an international policy imperative that remains as elusive as it is desirable. Despite a plethora of inclusive policies and initiatives in Scotland such as Getting it Right for Every Child (2008 & 2012), Curriculum for Excellence (2009) and the Scottish Attainment Challenge (2015), significant numbers of young people cannot be said to experience equal access to educational opportunity. This paper draws upon complementary sociological and philosophical perspectives to explore why such barriers to equality of educational opportunity persist, before suggesting ways in which serious engagement with such theory might counter deficit assumptions in play and offer possible new ways forward. The point of departure is Bourdieu’s typology of various forms of social capital which highlights how possession of capital is advantageous to upper and middle class families, whereas lack of such capital serves to restrict educational opportunities for young people from working class and disadvantaged backgrounds. Such an analysis argues that reproduction of social conditions, styles of thinking and decision-making, coupled with oppressive societal structures, all serve to disempower young people and impact negatively upon their educational attainment. This paper explores a variety of ways in which theory might challenge and interrupt assumptions informing discourses associated with inequality and their associated remedies. Through engaging a series of problematics within current framings of inequality, the paper argues that a more sustained engagement with theory offers the possibility of more nuanced understandings of inequality and a provocation to imagine otherwise. Engaging in such imaginative work might, moreover, enable the barriers to equality of educational opportunity to be better addressed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
平等获得教育机会的难以捉摸:十年包容性政策之后的苏格兰。
实现平等获得教育机会是一项国际政策的当务之急,但这项政策仍然难以实现。尽管苏格兰出台了大量包容性政策和举措,如《让每个孩子都能得到正确的教育》(2008年和2012年)、《卓越课程》(2009年)和《苏格兰成就挑战》(2015年),但不能说大量年轻人获得了平等的教育机会。本文借鉴了互补的社会学和哲学观点,探讨了为什么教育机会平等的障碍仍然存在,然后提出了认真参与这一理论可以对抗赤字假设的方法,并提供了可能的新的前进道路。出发点是布迪厄对各种形式的社会资本的类型学,它强调了拥有资本对中上层家庭是多么有利,而缺乏这种资本则限制了工人阶级和弱势背景的年轻人的教育机会。这种分析认为,社会条件、思维方式和决策方式的再生产,加上压迫性的社会结构,都会剥夺年轻人的权力,并对他们的教育程度产生负面影响。本文探讨了理论可能挑战和中断与不平等相关的话语假设及其相关补救措施的各种方式。通过在当前的不平等框架中处理一系列问题,本文认为,更持久地参与理论提供了对不平等进行更细致理解的可能性,并激发了人们对不平等的想象。此外,从事这种富有想象力的工作可能会更好地解决教育机会平等的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pamela Burnard, Elizabeth Mackinlay, David Roussell and Tatiana Dragovic (Editors), Doing Rebellious Research In and Beyond the Academy Education In The Scottish Parliament Beyond the Pandemic – Poverty and School Education in Scotland Older Children Negotiating Relationships Between Home and School Access and Emergence: A Case Study of a Working-Class Journey into Studying Medicine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1