The Comparative Analysis of Face-To-Face, Distant, and Blended Learning in English Language Teaching

IF 0.4 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH REGISTER Journal Pub Date : 2022-02-15 DOI:10.18326/rgt.v15i1.42-63
M. Podoliak
{"title":"The Comparative Analysis of Face-To-Face, Distant, and Blended Learning in English Language Teaching","authors":"M. Podoliak","doi":"10.18326/rgt.v15i1.42-63","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Distant and blended learning are modern educational methodologies, gaining popularity among many teachers and students worldwide. These teaching methods became more popular owing to COVID 19 and quarantine measures in education. In this article, we set the aim to compare three methods of teaching a foreign language in the University: traditional (face-to-face), distant and blended, and determine which method yields the best results. The research lasted for one semester and consisted of the following stages: initial – the preparation for experiment; educational – the usage of the selected teaching method; final – collecting results and their analysis. The research results have demonstrated that the blended approach of language teaching proved to be more effective in both the results of the tests. Therefore, blended learning proved to be an effective way of teaching a foreign language in the University.Keywords: traditional learning, distant learning, blended learning, English language teaching. ","PeriodicalId":40585,"journal":{"name":"REGISTER Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REGISTER Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18326/rgt.v15i1.42-63","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Distant and blended learning are modern educational methodologies, gaining popularity among many teachers and students worldwide. These teaching methods became more popular owing to COVID 19 and quarantine measures in education. In this article, we set the aim to compare three methods of teaching a foreign language in the University: traditional (face-to-face), distant and blended, and determine which method yields the best results. The research lasted for one semester and consisted of the following stages: initial – the preparation for experiment; educational – the usage of the selected teaching method; final – collecting results and their analysis. The research results have demonstrated that the blended approach of language teaching proved to be more effective in both the results of the tests. Therefore, blended learning proved to be an effective way of teaching a foreign language in the University.Keywords: traditional learning, distant learning, blended learning, English language teaching. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英语教学中面对面学习、远程学习和混合学习的比较分析
远程和混合学习是现代教育方法,在世界各地的许多教师和学生中越来越受欢迎。由于新冠肺炎疫情和教育中的隔离措施,这些教学方法变得更加流行。在这篇文章中,我们的目标是比较大学外语教学的三种方法:传统的(面对面)、远距离的和混合的,并确定哪种方法效果最好。该研究持续了一个学期,包括以下阶段:初始阶段——实验准备阶段;教育——使用选定的教学方法;最终–收集结果及其分析。研究结果表明,混合式语言教学法在两项测试中都更有效。因此,混合学习被证明是大学外语教学的有效途径。关键词:传统学习、远程学习、混合学习、英语教学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
REGISTER Journal
REGISTER Journal Multiple-
自引率
4.80%
发文量
2
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊最新文献
Unraveling Gender-related differences in Compliment exchanges: the case of Hijazi Speakers Attitude and Political Ideology of 2024 Indonesian Presidential Candidates Reported in Jakartapost.com A Corpus-Based Lexical Coverage of Coursebooks in Nigeria: A Case Study A Qualitative Analysis of WhatsApp Integration on Speaking Vocabulary Development Unveiling the Lecturers’ and Students' Needs in English for Public Administration Program: Essential Vocabulary Topics, Instructional Methods, and Learning Challenges
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1