The Development and Evaluation of a Participant Led Physical Activity Intervention for People with Disabilities Who Intend to Become More Active

Q1 Medicine Physical Activity and Health Pub Date : 2019-10-04 DOI:10.5334/paah.27
Eva A. Jaarsma, Brett Smith
{"title":"The Development and Evaluation of a Participant Led Physical Activity Intervention for People with Disabilities Who Intend to Become More Active","authors":"Eva A. Jaarsma, Brett Smith","doi":"10.5334/paah.27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: People with disabilities are amongst the most inactive people in the community. In addition their high levels of inactivity, their sedentary time is also rising. Previous research has acknowledged that intention to change their current behaviour is a key element to promote physical activity for inactive people with disabilities. The main purpose of this study was therefore to specifically develop and evaluate a 30 week participant-led physical activity programme for inactive people who intend to become physically active. The second purpose was to explore positive and negative experiences of people with disabilities during the process of becoming physically active. Materials and Methods: We used a convergent parallel mixed method design. We used thematic analysis to analyse data from focus groups and Friedman tests to determine differences in physical activity, sedentary time and self-efficacy at baseline, week 12 and week 30. Post hoc tests were performed using Wilcoxon tests to determine any significant short- or long-term differences in physical activity, sedentary time and self-efficacy. Results: 15 participants completed the programme, showing significant decreases in sedentary time as well as increases in physical activity levels and self-efficacy. Results from the focus groups indicated that maintaining regular physical activity is a complex process. Elements such as action planning and coping strategies helped participants to increase and maintain their activity levels. Discussion: This study provides strong indications to promote physical activity for inactive people with disabilities by focusing on reducing sedentary time and promoting more activity throughout the day.","PeriodicalId":32633,"journal":{"name":"Physical Activity and Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Activity and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/paah.27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective: People with disabilities are amongst the most inactive people in the community. In addition their high levels of inactivity, their sedentary time is also rising. Previous research has acknowledged that intention to change their current behaviour is a key element to promote physical activity for inactive people with disabilities. The main purpose of this study was therefore to specifically develop and evaluate a 30 week participant-led physical activity programme for inactive people who intend to become physically active. The second purpose was to explore positive and negative experiences of people with disabilities during the process of becoming physically active. Materials and Methods: We used a convergent parallel mixed method design. We used thematic analysis to analyse data from focus groups and Friedman tests to determine differences in physical activity, sedentary time and self-efficacy at baseline, week 12 and week 30. Post hoc tests were performed using Wilcoxon tests to determine any significant short- or long-term differences in physical activity, sedentary time and self-efficacy. Results: 15 participants completed the programme, showing significant decreases in sedentary time as well as increases in physical activity levels and self-efficacy. Results from the focus groups indicated that maintaining regular physical activity is a complex process. Elements such as action planning and coping strategies helped participants to increase and maintain their activity levels. Discussion: This study provides strong indications to promote physical activity for inactive people with disabilities by focusing on reducing sedentary time and promoting more activity throughout the day.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
参与者主导的旨在变得更活跃的残疾人体育活动干预的发展和评估
目标:残疾人是社区中最不活跃的人群之一。除了他们高度不活动之外,他们久坐的时间也在增加。先前的研究已经承认,改变他们当前行为的意图是促进不活跃残疾人体育活动的关键因素。因此,本研究的主要目的是专门制定和评估一项为期30周的参与者主导的体育活动计划,该计划针对那些打算进行体育活动的不活跃人群。第二个目的是探讨残疾人在进行体育活动过程中的积极和消极经历。材料和方法:我们采用了一种收敛的平行混合方法设计。我们使用主题分析来分析焦点小组和弗里德曼测试的数据,以确定基线、第12周和第30周的身体活动、久坐时间和自我效能感的差异。使用Wilcoxon测试进行事后测试,以确定身体活动、久坐时间和自我效能方面的任何短期或长期显著差异。结果:15名参与者完成了该项目,显示出久坐时间显著减少,体育活动水平和自我效能感显著提高。焦点小组的结果表明,保持有规律的体育活动是一个复杂的过程。行动计划和应对策略等要素有助于参与者提高和保持活动水平。讨论:这项研究通过减少久坐时间和促进全天更多的活动,为促进不活跃的残疾人的体育活动提供了强有力的指示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Physical Activity and Health
Physical Activity and Health Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Relationship Between Physical Activity Levels and Mental Health in UK University Students ‘MenoWell’: A pilot 6-week novel, online, multimodal exercise and health education programme for women in all stages of menopause living in Laois, Ireland Education and Measurement are the Top Priorities to Advance Physical Literacy for Individuals with Physical Disabilities Foot Morphology and Running Gait Pattern between the Left and Right Limbs in Recreational Runners Avoiding God’s Waiting Room: Lessons from the Lived Experiences of Older People who Use Digital Technology to Support Physical Activity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1