Education and Measurement are the Top Priorities to Advance Physical Literacy for Individuals with Physical Disabilities

Q1 Medicine Physical Activity and Health Pub Date : 2023-04-19 DOI:10.5334/paah.219
M. Robert, K. Best, M. Hebinck, Roxanne Périnet-Lacroix, Ueli Albert, K. Arbour-Nicitopoulos, M. Labbe, Alexis Boulenger, C. Batcho, D. Maltais, P. Rushton
{"title":"Education and Measurement are the Top Priorities to Advance Physical Literacy for Individuals with Physical Disabilities","authors":"M. Robert, K. Best, M. Hebinck, Roxanne Périnet-Lacroix, Ueli Albert, K. Arbour-Nicitopoulos, M. Labbe, Alexis Boulenger, C. Batcho, D. Maltais, P. Rushton","doi":"10.5334/paah.219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Most individuals with physical disabilities do not meet physical activity recommendations, which may negatively impact quality of life. Physical literacy is a concept that considers the key elements necessary to support lifelong physical activity. Limited attention has been directed towards physical literacy for individuals with physical disabilities.\nObjectives: To obtain expert consensus on strategic priorities to delineate the next steps on physical literacy for individuals with physical disabilities.\nMethods: The Collaborative Prioritized Planning Process was followed during a two-day online consensus meeting with experts in disability and physical activity. This systematic four-step process involved: 1) knowledge synthesis before the meeting, 2) challenge identification and prioritization, 3) solution identification, consolidation and prioritization, and 4) action planning.\nResults: Thirty-one experts participated in the meeting. Five challenges related to physical literacy for individuals with physical disabilities were prioritized. The following solutions were suggested: developing a massive online open course, creating a physical literacy measurement toolkit, developing a physical literacy resource portal, creating a national database of physical literacy outcomes, and redefining an existing international consensus statement for physical literacy to be more inclusive.\nConclusions: Collaborations between experts are needed to advance the research in physical literacy for people with disabilities through education and measurement.","PeriodicalId":32633,"journal":{"name":"Physical Activity and Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Activity and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/paah.219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Most individuals with physical disabilities do not meet physical activity recommendations, which may negatively impact quality of life. Physical literacy is a concept that considers the key elements necessary to support lifelong physical activity. Limited attention has been directed towards physical literacy for individuals with physical disabilities. Objectives: To obtain expert consensus on strategic priorities to delineate the next steps on physical literacy for individuals with physical disabilities. Methods: The Collaborative Prioritized Planning Process was followed during a two-day online consensus meeting with experts in disability and physical activity. This systematic four-step process involved: 1) knowledge synthesis before the meeting, 2) challenge identification and prioritization, 3) solution identification, consolidation and prioritization, and 4) action planning. Results: Thirty-one experts participated in the meeting. Five challenges related to physical literacy for individuals with physical disabilities were prioritized. The following solutions were suggested: developing a massive online open course, creating a physical literacy measurement toolkit, developing a physical literacy resource portal, creating a national database of physical literacy outcomes, and redefining an existing international consensus statement for physical literacy to be more inclusive. Conclusions: Collaborations between experts are needed to advance the research in physical literacy for people with disabilities through education and measurement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教育和测量是提高身体残疾者身体素质的首要任务
背景:大多数身体残疾的人不符合体育活动的建议,这可能会对生活质量产生负面影响。体育素养是一个考虑到支持终身体育活动所必需的关键要素的概念。对身体残疾者的身体识字关注有限。目标:就战略优先事项达成专家共识,以确定身体残疾者身体识字的下一步行动。方法:在与残疾和体育活动专家举行的为期两天的在线共识会议上,遵循了协作优先规划流程。这一系统的四步过程包括:1)会前知识综合,2)挑战识别和优先排序,3)解决方案识别、整合和优先排序以及4)行动规划。结果:31名专家参加了会议。优先考虑了与身体残疾者的身体识字有关的五项挑战。有人提出了以下解决方案:开发一个大规模的在线开放课程,创建一个物理识字测量工具包,开发一个物理扫盲资源门户网站,建立一个国家物理识字结果数据库,并重新定义现有的国际共识声明,使物理识字更具包容性。结论:需要专家之间的合作,通过教育和测量来推进残疾人体育素养的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Physical Activity and Health
Physical Activity and Health Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Relationship Between Physical Activity Levels and Mental Health in UK University Students ‘MenoWell’: A pilot 6-week novel, online, multimodal exercise and health education programme for women in all stages of menopause living in Laois, Ireland Education and Measurement are the Top Priorities to Advance Physical Literacy for Individuals with Physical Disabilities Foot Morphology and Running Gait Pattern between the Left and Right Limbs in Recreational Runners Avoiding God’s Waiting Room: Lessons from the Lived Experiences of Older People who Use Digital Technology to Support Physical Activity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1