Understanding Common Rationales Adopted in Healthcare Price Setting Across the Private Healthcare Sector in Sri Lanka: A qualitative study

IF 0.6 Q4 Health Professions Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management Pub Date : 2022-12-26 DOI:10.24083/apjhm.v17i3.1635
Kanchana Sajeeva Narangoda, J. Park, M. Tennant, E. Kruger
{"title":"Understanding Common Rationales Adopted in Healthcare Price Setting Across the Private Healthcare Sector in Sri Lanka: A qualitative study","authors":"Kanchana Sajeeva Narangoda, J. Park, M. Tennant, E. Kruger","doi":"10.24083/apjhm.v17i3.1635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background / Objectives: The Sri Lankan healthcare system consists of public and private sectors. In terms of capacity, the public sector dominates the provision of care across curative, preventive and outpatient care. The private sector, too, has grown rapidly in recent years but was mainly confined to providing curative, diagnostic and outpatient care. Since, there are little or no studies conducted in Sri Lanka thus far, the objective of this study was to understand the current approaches adopted in determining the base of healthcare payments. This study also investigated the economic and administrative processes involved in determining the level of healthcare pricing in the private sector healthcare industry in Sri Lanka.\nMethod: This qualitative study investigated the rationales adopted in healthcare pricing by healthcare administrators in the private sector. Structured interviews were conducted and thematic analysis were applied to interview data collected and analysis.\nResults: Five key themes, which influenced pricing, were identified from the interviews. These themes included influence from medical practitioners/clinicians, competitor pricing, price adjustment/profit margins, consumables and staff, and economic demands. There was a consensus that competitor pricing and seniority of the practicing clinicians had an impact on pricing. \nConclusion: This study revealed that the base of payment in private sector healthcare is fee for service (FFS). Adopting popular international approaches such as Diagnostic Related Groups (DRGS) was not shown in this study. Further, it was evident that the Sri Lankan private healthcare sector administrators unilaterally fix pricing based on the identified key themes without adequately consulting the healthcare payers and users.","PeriodicalId":42935,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24083/apjhm.v17i3.1635","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background / Objectives: The Sri Lankan healthcare system consists of public and private sectors. In terms of capacity, the public sector dominates the provision of care across curative, preventive and outpatient care. The private sector, too, has grown rapidly in recent years but was mainly confined to providing curative, diagnostic and outpatient care. Since, there are little or no studies conducted in Sri Lanka thus far, the objective of this study was to understand the current approaches adopted in determining the base of healthcare payments. This study also investigated the economic and administrative processes involved in determining the level of healthcare pricing in the private sector healthcare industry in Sri Lanka. Method: This qualitative study investigated the rationales adopted in healthcare pricing by healthcare administrators in the private sector. Structured interviews were conducted and thematic analysis were applied to interview data collected and analysis. Results: Five key themes, which influenced pricing, were identified from the interviews. These themes included influence from medical practitioners/clinicians, competitor pricing, price adjustment/profit margins, consumables and staff, and economic demands. There was a consensus that competitor pricing and seniority of the practicing clinicians had an impact on pricing.  Conclusion: This study revealed that the base of payment in private sector healthcare is fee for service (FFS). Adopting popular international approaches such as Diagnostic Related Groups (DRGS) was not shown in this study. Further, it was evident that the Sri Lankan private healthcare sector administrators unilaterally fix pricing based on the identified key themes without adequately consulting the healthcare payers and users.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
理解在医疗保健价格设置在斯里兰卡私营医疗保健部门采用的共同原理:一项定性研究
背景/目标:斯里兰卡的医疗保健系统由公共和私营部门组成。就能力而言,公共部门在提供治疗、预防和门诊护理方面占主导地位。私营部门近年来也迅速增长,但主要局限于提供治疗、诊断和门诊服务。由于迄今为止在斯里兰卡进行的研究很少或没有,因此本研究的目的是了解在确定医疗保健支付基础方面采用的当前方法。本研究还调查了经济和行政程序参与确定医疗保健定价水平在私营部门医疗保健行业在斯里兰卡。方法:本定性研究调查了私营部门卫生保健管理人员在卫生保健定价中采用的基本原理。访谈采用结构化访谈,访谈数据收集与分析采用主题分析。结果:从访谈中确定了影响定价的五个关键主题。这些主题包括来自医生/临床医生的影响、竞争对手定价、价格调整/利润率、耗材和人员以及经济需求。竞争对手的定价和执业医师的资历对定价有影响。结论:本研究揭示了私营医疗机构的支付基础为服务费(FFS)。采用流行的国际方法,如诊断相关组(DRGS)在本研究中没有显示。此外,很明显,斯里兰卡私营医疗保健部门管理人员在没有充分咨询医疗保健支付者和用户的情况下,根据确定的关键主题单方面确定定价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management
Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
51
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
Gap Analysis of Providing Primary Health Care in Comprehensive Rural Health Centers of Iran Leading for Sustainable Health Systems Welcome to the final issue of the College’s Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management for 2023 Australian Health Services Management Courses: A discussion on syllabus Performance of Primary Health Centres, Provider’s Perspective of Wellbeing, and Patient’s Assessment of the Centres Using a New Tool in Bangalore, India: An empirical study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1