Student Conceptions of the Equal Sign

IF 1.2 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Elementary School Journal Pub Date : 2022-02-02 DOI:10.1086/717999
Nicole C. Ralston, Min Li
{"title":"Student Conceptions of the Equal Sign","authors":"Nicole C. Ralston, Min Li","doi":"10.1086/717999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research in the area of equivalence and the equal sign dates back decades, demonstrating students often possess misconceptions concerning the meaning of equivalence and the equal sign. Students often understand the equal sign to mean the answer comes next (i.e., an operational definition) instead of the same as (i.e., a relational definition). However, very few, if any, of these studies utilized random samples or large sample sizes, or collected data across all elementary grades to better understand these issues. The purpose of this study was to therefore replicate earlier work to better understand student equivalence knowledge using a large (n = 1,745) random stratified cluster sample of elementary students across grades 1–5. The results corroborated the findings of other researchers, determining that few students hold relational views of the equal sign, many students exhibit various misconceptions when solving equivalence items, and knowledge primarily improves across the elementary grades.","PeriodicalId":48010,"journal":{"name":"Elementary School Journal","volume":"122 1","pages":"411 - 432"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Elementary School Journal","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/717999","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Research in the area of equivalence and the equal sign dates back decades, demonstrating students often possess misconceptions concerning the meaning of equivalence and the equal sign. Students often understand the equal sign to mean the answer comes next (i.e., an operational definition) instead of the same as (i.e., a relational definition). However, very few, if any, of these studies utilized random samples or large sample sizes, or collected data across all elementary grades to better understand these issues. The purpose of this study was to therefore replicate earlier work to better understand student equivalence knowledge using a large (n = 1,745) random stratified cluster sample of elementary students across grades 1–5. The results corroborated the findings of other researchers, determining that few students hold relational views of the equal sign, many students exhibit various misconceptions when solving equivalence items, and knowledge primarily improves across the elementary grades.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学生对等号的概念
对等和等号领域的研究可以追溯到几十年前,这表明学生经常对对等和等号的含义存在误解。学生们通常把等号理解为答案在后面(即操作定义),而不是与(即关系定义)相同。然而,这些研究中很少(如果有的话)使用随机样本或大样本,或收集所有小学年级的数据来更好地理解这些问题。因此,本研究的目的是复制先前的工作,以更好地了解学生等效性知识,使用1-5年级小学生的大型随机分层样本(n = 1,745)。结果证实了其他研究人员的发现,确定很少有学生持有等号的关系观点,许多学生在解决等效性问题时表现出各种误解,并且知识主要是在小学阶段提高的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Elementary School Journal
Elementary School Journal EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: The Elementary School Journal has served researchers, teacher educators, and practitioners in the elementary and middle school education for over one hundred years. ESJ publishes peer-reviewed articles dealing with both education theory and research and their implications for teaching practice. In addition, ESJ presents articles that relate the latest research in child development, cognitive psychology, and sociology to school learning and teaching. ESJ prefers to publish original studies that contain data about school and classroom processes in elementary or middle schools while occasionally publishing integrative research reviews and in-depth conceptual analyses of schooling.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation and optimization of sequence-based gene regulatory deep learning models. “It’s Just Something That You Have to Do as a Teacher” Front Matter 41 Teachers, 41 Different Ways Predictable Variation in the Implementation of a Curricular Intervention—and Why it Matters
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1