{"title":"Student Conceptions of the Equal Sign","authors":"Nicole C. Ralston, Min Li","doi":"10.1086/717999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research in the area of equivalence and the equal sign dates back decades, demonstrating students often possess misconceptions concerning the meaning of equivalence and the equal sign. Students often understand the equal sign to mean the answer comes next (i.e., an operational definition) instead of the same as (i.e., a relational definition). However, very few, if any, of these studies utilized random samples or large sample sizes, or collected data across all elementary grades to better understand these issues. The purpose of this study was to therefore replicate earlier work to better understand student equivalence knowledge using a large (n = 1,745) random stratified cluster sample of elementary students across grades 1–5. The results corroborated the findings of other researchers, determining that few students hold relational views of the equal sign, many students exhibit various misconceptions when solving equivalence items, and knowledge primarily improves across the elementary grades.","PeriodicalId":48010,"journal":{"name":"Elementary School Journal","volume":"122 1","pages":"411 - 432"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Elementary School Journal","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/717999","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Research in the area of equivalence and the equal sign dates back decades, demonstrating students often possess misconceptions concerning the meaning of equivalence and the equal sign. Students often understand the equal sign to mean the answer comes next (i.e., an operational definition) instead of the same as (i.e., a relational definition). However, very few, if any, of these studies utilized random samples or large sample sizes, or collected data across all elementary grades to better understand these issues. The purpose of this study was to therefore replicate earlier work to better understand student equivalence knowledge using a large (n = 1,745) random stratified cluster sample of elementary students across grades 1–5. The results corroborated the findings of other researchers, determining that few students hold relational views of the equal sign, many students exhibit various misconceptions when solving equivalence items, and knowledge primarily improves across the elementary grades.
期刊介绍:
The Elementary School Journal has served researchers, teacher educators, and practitioners in the elementary and middle school education for over one hundred years. ESJ publishes peer-reviewed articles dealing with both education theory and research and their implications for teaching practice. In addition, ESJ presents articles that relate the latest research in child development, cognitive psychology, and sociology to school learning and teaching. ESJ prefers to publish original studies that contain data about school and classroom processes in elementary or middle schools while occasionally publishing integrative research reviews and in-depth conceptual analyses of schooling.