Uveal melanoma: clinical management of ocular complications after tumor biopsy

IF 0.9 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY Expert Review of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2022-03-04 DOI:10.1080/17469899.2022.2065984
Z. Corrêa
{"title":"Uveal melanoma: clinical management of ocular complications after tumor biopsy","authors":"Z. Corrêa","doi":"10.1080/17469899.2022.2065984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Introduction Sampling of uveal tumors using fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) or vitrectomy cutter choroidal biopsy (VCCB) has become part of the standard of care in diagnosis and prognosis of uveal melanomas and borderline melanocytic uveal tumors. For early adopters, the use of FNAB (or VCCB) has shown that benefits of tumor sampling far outweigh the risks, particularly with respect to the ability to confirm tumor diagnostic and prognostic testing. Areas covered This manuscript will review the different techniques used to obtain small samples of uveal tumors with minimal disruption of the ocular tissues, briefly discuss clinical applications and complications of FNAB and VCCB, and ways in which to improve specimen yield and patient outcomes. Expert opinion The published literature shows a lack of uniformity in indication and surgical techniques among ocular oncologists performing FNAB and VCCB. This fact can potentially lead to discrepant results that include variable rates of success in obtaining a sufficient specimen and a wide range of complications, from intraocular hemorrhage, retinal detachment to anecdotal cases of seeding of the biopsy needle track and extraocular tumor extension. Uniform indications and surgical techniques would allow comparison among different centers and protocols to minimize and manage complications.","PeriodicalId":39989,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Ophthalmology","volume":"17 1","pages":"115 - 121"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17469899.2022.2065984","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction Sampling of uveal tumors using fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) or vitrectomy cutter choroidal biopsy (VCCB) has become part of the standard of care in diagnosis and prognosis of uveal melanomas and borderline melanocytic uveal tumors. For early adopters, the use of FNAB (or VCCB) has shown that benefits of tumor sampling far outweigh the risks, particularly with respect to the ability to confirm tumor diagnostic and prognostic testing. Areas covered This manuscript will review the different techniques used to obtain small samples of uveal tumors with minimal disruption of the ocular tissues, briefly discuss clinical applications and complications of FNAB and VCCB, and ways in which to improve specimen yield and patient outcomes. Expert opinion The published literature shows a lack of uniformity in indication and surgical techniques among ocular oncologists performing FNAB and VCCB. This fact can potentially lead to discrepant results that include variable rates of success in obtaining a sufficient specimen and a wide range of complications, from intraocular hemorrhage, retinal detachment to anecdotal cases of seeding of the biopsy needle track and extraocular tumor extension. Uniform indications and surgical techniques would allow comparison among different centers and protocols to minimize and manage complications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
葡萄膜黑色素瘤:肿瘤活检后眼部并发症的临床处理
采用细针穿刺活检(FNAB)或玻璃体切除术切割器脉络膜活检(VCCB)对葡萄膜肿瘤进行取样已成为葡萄膜黑色素瘤和交界性黑色素细胞葡萄膜肿瘤诊断和预后标准的一部分。对于早期采用者来说,FNAB(或VCCB)的使用表明,肿瘤取样的好处远远大于风险,特别是在确认肿瘤诊断和预后测试方面。本文将回顾用于获得葡萄膜肿瘤小样本的不同技术,同时对眼组织的破坏最小,简要讨论FNAB和VCCB的临床应用和并发症,以及提高标本产量和患者预后的方法。专家意见已发表的文献显示,在进行FNAB和VCCB的眼科肿瘤学家之间,在适应证和手术技术上缺乏一致性。这一事实可能会导致不同的结果,包括获得足够标本的成功率不同,以及各种并发症,从眼内出血、视网膜脱离到活检针迹播种和眼外肿瘤扩展的轶事病例。统一的适应症和手术技术将允许在不同的中心和方案之间进行比较,以尽量减少和管理并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Review of Ophthalmology
Expert Review of Ophthalmology Health Professions-Optometry
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: The worldwide problem of visual impairment is set to increase, as we are seeing increased longevity in developed countries. This will produce a crisis in vision care unless concerted action is taken. The substantial value that ophthalmic interventions confer to patients with eye diseases has led to intense research efforts in this area in recent years, with corresponding improvements in treatment, ophthalmic instrumentation and surgical techniques. As a result, the future for ophthalmology holds great promise as further exciting and innovative developments unfold.
期刊最新文献
How Genome-Wide Association Studies Transform Care for Patients at Risk of Glaucoma. Systemic and Ocular Associations of Keratoconus. Spaceflight associated neuro-ocular syndrome (SANS): a systematic review, implications for the sans case definition Stem cell therapy in retinal diseases: current evidence Morphometric analysis of orbital CT scan in a Jordanian sample
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1