Why African American Philosophy Matters: A Case for Not Centering White Philosophers and White Philosophy

IF 0.3 3区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY Philosophia Africana Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI:10.5325/philafri.20.1.0044
E. Radney
{"title":"Why African American Philosophy Matters: A Case for Not Centering White Philosophers and White Philosophy","authors":"E. Radney","doi":"10.5325/philafri.20.1.0044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article asks why African American Philosophy matters. The notion of the “Black philosopher” continues to be an enigma. African descendants are not generally associated with the revered location and status of “the philosopher” and with doing philosophy. In a celebration of the sustained work of the Black philosopher-practitioner, who continues to suffer a fate of deliberate academic “invisibility” and historical erasure, this article supports the expansion of philosophical categories, philosophical conversation, and philosophical inclusivity. This work contends that the marginalization of African American philosophy can be understood from a synthesis of Foucault’s thesis of “subjugated knowledge” (how certain discourses are routinely disqualified by dominant ones) and Black philosopher Lewis Gordon’s explanation of “subverted realization,” which is built in to “white” modern thought. Both key philosophers help locate the problem questioned here. The overriding current of the “white (main) stream” of philosophy, by its deliberate exclusion of African American philosophy, disqualifies it.","PeriodicalId":42045,"journal":{"name":"Philosophia Africana","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophia Africana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/philafri.20.1.0044","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article asks why African American Philosophy matters. The notion of the “Black philosopher” continues to be an enigma. African descendants are not generally associated with the revered location and status of “the philosopher” and with doing philosophy. In a celebration of the sustained work of the Black philosopher-practitioner, who continues to suffer a fate of deliberate academic “invisibility” and historical erasure, this article supports the expansion of philosophical categories, philosophical conversation, and philosophical inclusivity. This work contends that the marginalization of African American philosophy can be understood from a synthesis of Foucault’s thesis of “subjugated knowledge” (how certain discourses are routinely disqualified by dominant ones) and Black philosopher Lewis Gordon’s explanation of “subverted realization,” which is built in to “white” modern thought. Both key philosophers help locate the problem questioned here. The overriding current of the “white (main) stream” of philosophy, by its deliberate exclusion of African American philosophy, disqualifies it.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为什么非裔美国人哲学很重要:一个不以白人哲学家和白人哲学为中心的案例
这篇文章问为什么非裔美国人的哲学很重要。“黑人哲学家”的概念仍然是个谜。非洲后裔通常不会与“哲学家”的受人尊敬的位置和地位以及行为哲学联系在一起。为了庆祝这位黑人哲学家实践者的持续工作,他继续遭受着蓄意的学术“隐形”和历史抹去的命运,本文支持哲学范畴、哲学对话和哲学包容性的扩展。这项工作认为,非裔美国人哲学的边缘化可以从福柯的“被征服的知识”(某些话语如何经常被占主导地位的话语取消资格)和黑人哲学家刘易斯·戈登对“被颠覆的实现”的解释的综合来理解,这是建立在“白人”现代思想中的。两位主要哲学家都有助于找到这里所质疑的问题。哲学“白人(主流)”的压倒一切的潮流,通过故意排斥非裔美国人的哲学,使其失去资格。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Philosophia Africana
Philosophia Africana PHILOSOPHY-
自引率
33.30%
发文量
5
期刊最新文献
Enactivist African Philosophy: A Response A New Approach to African Philosophy: A Critique What Is Native to Philosophy? A Critique of Wiredu’s Project of Conceptual Decolonization of African Philosophy Spaces of Thought: A Response to Critiques
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1