Effect modification of the association between fine particulate air pollution during a wildfire event and respiratory health by area-level measures of socio-economic status, race/ethnicity, and smoking prevalence.

Environmental research, health : ERH Pub Date : 2023-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-11 DOI:10.1088/2752-5309/acc4e1
C E Reid, E M Considine, G L Watson, D Telesca, G G Pfister, M Jerrett
{"title":"Effect modification of the association between fine particulate air pollution during a wildfire event and respiratory health by area-level measures of socio-economic status, race/ethnicity, and smoking prevalence.","authors":"C E Reid, E M Considine, G L Watson, D Telesca, G G Pfister, M Jerrett","doi":"10.1088/2752-5309/acc4e1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fine particulate air pollution (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) is decreasing in most areas of the United States, except for areas most affected by wildfires, where increasing trends in PM<sub>2.5</sub> can be attributed to wildfire smoke. The frequency and duration of large wildfires and the length of the wildfire season have all increased in recent decades, partially due to climate change, and wildfire risk is projected to increase further in many regions including the western United States. Increasingly, empirical evidence suggests differential health effects from air pollution by class and race; however, few studies have investigated such differential health impacts from air pollution during a wildfire event. We investigated differential risk of respiratory health impacts during the 2008 northern California wildfires by a comprehensive list of socio-economic status (SES), race/ethnicity, and smoking prevalence variables. Regardless of SES level across nine measures of SES, we found significant associations between PM<sub>2.5</sub> and asthma hospitalizations and emergency department (ED) visits during these wildfires. Differential respiratory health risk was found by SES for ED visits for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease where the highest risks were in ZIP codes with the lowest SES levels. Findings for differential effects by race/ethnicity were less consistent across health outcomes. We found that ZIP codes with higher prevalence of smokers had greater risk of ED visits for asthma and pneumonia. Our study suggests that public health efforts to decrease exposures to high levels of air pollution during wildfires should focus on lower SES communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":72938,"journal":{"name":"Environmental research, health : ERH","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10852067/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental research, health : ERH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2752-5309/acc4e1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fine particulate air pollution (PM2.5) is decreasing in most areas of the United States, except for areas most affected by wildfires, where increasing trends in PM2.5 can be attributed to wildfire smoke. The frequency and duration of large wildfires and the length of the wildfire season have all increased in recent decades, partially due to climate change, and wildfire risk is projected to increase further in many regions including the western United States. Increasingly, empirical evidence suggests differential health effects from air pollution by class and race; however, few studies have investigated such differential health impacts from air pollution during a wildfire event. We investigated differential risk of respiratory health impacts during the 2008 northern California wildfires by a comprehensive list of socio-economic status (SES), race/ethnicity, and smoking prevalence variables. Regardless of SES level across nine measures of SES, we found significant associations between PM2.5 and asthma hospitalizations and emergency department (ED) visits during these wildfires. Differential respiratory health risk was found by SES for ED visits for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease where the highest risks were in ZIP codes with the lowest SES levels. Findings for differential effects by race/ethnicity were less consistent across health outcomes. We found that ZIP codes with higher prevalence of smokers had greater risk of ED visits for asthma and pneumonia. Our study suggests that public health efforts to decrease exposures to high levels of air pollution during wildfires should focus on lower SES communities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过社会经济地位、种族/民族和吸烟率的区域水平措施,对野火事件期间细颗粒物空气污染与呼吸健康之间关系的影响修正
美国大部分地区的细颗粒物空气污染(PM2.5)正在减少,但受野火影响最严重的地区除外,那里PM2.5的增加趋势可归因于野火烟雾。近几十年来,大型野火的频率和持续时间以及野火季节的长度都有所增加,部分原因是气候变化,包括美国西部在内的许多地区的野火风险预计将进一步增加。越来越多的经验证据表明,空气污染对健康的影响因阶级和种族而异;然而,很少有研究调查野火期间空气污染对健康的影响。我们通过社会经济地位(SES)、种族/民族和吸烟率变量的综合列表,调查了2008年北加利福尼亚州野火期间呼吸道健康影响的不同风险。不管SES的九项指标的SES水平如何,我们发现PM2.5与这些野火期间哮喘住院和急诊科就诊之间存在显著关联。SES在慢性阻塞性肺病急诊就诊中发现了不同的呼吸健康风险,其中SES水平最低的邮政编码风险最高。不同种族/民族的差异影响结果在健康结果中不太一致。我们发现,吸烟率较高的邮政编码地区哮喘和肺炎急诊就诊的风险更大。我们的研究表明,减少野火期间暴露在高水平空气污染中的公共卫生努力应该集中在SES较低的社区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Emergency department visits in California associated with wildfire PM2.5: differing risk across individuals and communities. Gestational and postnatal exposure to wildfire smoke and prolonged use of respiratory medications in early life. Association of ambient air pollution and pesticide mixtures on respiratory inflammatory markers in agricultural communities. Critical windows of greenness exposure during preconception and gestational periods in association with birthweight outcomes The synergistic health impacts of exposure to multiple stressors in Tulare County, California
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1