"Tree Thinking": The Rhetoric of Tree Diagrams in Biological Thought

Poroi Pub Date : 2020-05-23 DOI:10.13008/2151-2957.1290
Carolyn R. Miller, Molly Hartzog
{"title":"\"Tree Thinking\": The Rhetoric of Tree Diagrams in Biological Thought","authors":"Carolyn R. Miller, Molly Hartzog","doi":"10.13008/2151-2957.1290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tree-like visualizations have played a central role in taxonomic and evolutionary biology for centuries, and the idea of a “tree of life” has been a pervasive notion not only in biology but also in religion, philosophy, and literature for much longer. The tree of life is a central figure in Darwin’s Origin of Species in both verbal and visual forms. As one of the most powerful and pervasive images in biological thought, what conceptual and communicative work has it enabled? How have the visual qualities and elements of the tree form interacted with biological thinking over time? This paper examines the pre-Darwinian history of tree images, the significance of Darwin’s use of such images, and the development of tree diagrams after Darwin. This history shows evidence of four separate traditions of visualization: cosmological, logicalphilosophical, genealogical, and materialist. Visual traditions serve as rhetorical contexts that provide enthymematic backing, or what Perelman calls “objects of agreement,” for interpretation of tree diagrams. They produce polysemic warrants for arguments in different fields. The combination of the genealogical tradition with the cosmological and the logical changed the framework for thinking about the natural world and made Darwin’s theory of evolution possible; the later materialist tradition represents the “modernization” of biology as a science.","PeriodicalId":93222,"journal":{"name":"Poroi","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Poroi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13008/2151-2957.1290","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Tree-like visualizations have played a central role in taxonomic and evolutionary biology for centuries, and the idea of a “tree of life” has been a pervasive notion not only in biology but also in religion, philosophy, and literature for much longer. The tree of life is a central figure in Darwin’s Origin of Species in both verbal and visual forms. As one of the most powerful and pervasive images in biological thought, what conceptual and communicative work has it enabled? How have the visual qualities and elements of the tree form interacted with biological thinking over time? This paper examines the pre-Darwinian history of tree images, the significance of Darwin’s use of such images, and the development of tree diagrams after Darwin. This history shows evidence of four separate traditions of visualization: cosmological, logicalphilosophical, genealogical, and materialist. Visual traditions serve as rhetorical contexts that provide enthymematic backing, or what Perelman calls “objects of agreement,” for interpretation of tree diagrams. They produce polysemic warrants for arguments in different fields. The combination of the genealogical tradition with the cosmological and the logical changed the framework for thinking about the natural world and made Darwin’s theory of evolution possible; the later materialist tradition represents the “modernization” of biology as a science.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“树形思维”:生物学思维中的树形图修辞
几个世纪以来,树状可视化在分类学和进化生物学中发挥着核心作用,“生命之树”的概念不仅在生物学中,而且在宗教、哲学和文学中都是一个普遍存在的概念。生命之树是达尔文《物种起源》中语言和视觉形式的中心人物。作为生物学思想中最强大、最普遍的图像之一,它促成了什么概念和交流工作?随着时间的推移,树形的视觉品质和元素是如何与生物思维相互作用的?本文考察了前达尔文时期树木图像的历史,达尔文使用这些图像的意义,以及达尔文之后树木图的发展。这段历史证明了四种不同的可视化传统:宇宙学、逻辑哲学、系谱学和唯物主义。视觉传统充当修辞语境,为树状图的解释提供热情的支持,或Perelman所说的“一致对象”。它们为不同领域的论点提供了多义保证。系谱传统与宇宙学和逻辑学的结合改变了人们对自然世界的思考框架,使达尔文的进化论成为可能;后来的唯物主义传统代表了生物学作为一门科学的“现代化”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Relevance of Discursive Strategies to Information Evaluation Practices Rhetorical Ethnography and the Virtue of Vulnerability in Transdisciplinary Research Methods Binding Brain, Body and World: Pattern as a Figure of Knowledge in Andy Clark’s Work on Predictive Processing Johanna d'Arc of Mongolia As the Fairy Tale of Shock Economy Seeing as Making: Mediation, rhetoric, and the Ultrasound Informed Consent Act
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1