Unbanked status and use of alternative financial services among minority populations.

IF 1 4区 经济学 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Pension Economics & Finance Pub Date : 2021-10-01 Epub Date: 2019-02-28 DOI:10.1017/s1474747219000052
Silvia Helena Barcellos, Gema Zamarro
{"title":"Unbanked status and use of alternative financial services among minority populations.","authors":"Silvia Helena Barcellos, Gema Zamarro","doi":"10.1017/s1474747219000052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A large number of Americans do not have bank accounts (the 'unbanked') or rely on costly alternative financial services (AFS) such as payday loans (the 'underbanked'), with implications for wealth accumulation and retirement preparedness. Using primary data, we document large racial/ethnic differences in unbanked and in frequent AFS usage rates. We study the role of socio-economic status (SES), financial literacy, trust in financial institutions, networks, and time preferences in explaining these gaps. While these variables explain a large fraction of the white-minority gaps in unbanked status the same is not true for gaps in AFS use. A Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition confirms these patterns: gaps in unbanked status are mostly explained by differences in endowments across groups, for AFS gaps differences in returns to endowments have the largest explanatory power. Our findings suggest that, while related, unbanked and underbanked are distinct concepts with different underlying causes that may require different policy responses.</p>","PeriodicalId":46635,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pension Economics & Finance","volume":"20 1","pages":"468-481"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10623889/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pension Economics & Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1474747219000052","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A large number of Americans do not have bank accounts (the 'unbanked') or rely on costly alternative financial services (AFS) such as payday loans (the 'underbanked'), with implications for wealth accumulation and retirement preparedness. Using primary data, we document large racial/ethnic differences in unbanked and in frequent AFS usage rates. We study the role of socio-economic status (SES), financial literacy, trust in financial institutions, networks, and time preferences in explaining these gaps. While these variables explain a large fraction of the white-minority gaps in unbanked status the same is not true for gaps in AFS use. A Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition confirms these patterns: gaps in unbanked status are mostly explained by differences in endowments across groups, for AFS gaps differences in returns to endowments have the largest explanatory power. Our findings suggest that, while related, unbanked and underbanked are distinct concepts with different underlying causes that may require different policy responses.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
少数民族人口的无银行地位和替代金融服务的使用
摘要大量美国人没有银行账户(“无银行账户”)或依赖昂贵的替代金融服务(AFS),如发薪日贷款(“银行账户不足”),这对财富积累和退休准备有影响。使用原始数据,我们记录了无银行账户和频繁AFS使用率的巨大种族/民族差异。我们研究了社会经济地位(SES)、金融知识、对金融机构的信任、网络和时间偏好在解释这些差距中的作用。虽然这些变量解释了大部分白人少数群体在无银行账户状态下的差距,但AFS使用中的差距却并非如此。Blinder Oaxaca分解证实了这些模式:无银行账户状态的差距主要由不同群体的捐赠差异来解释,因为AFS差距捐赠回报率的差异具有最大的解释力。我们的研究结果表明,虽然有关联,但无银行账户和银行账户不足是不同的概念,有不同的根本原因,可能需要不同的政策回应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Social security and retirement around the world: lessons from a long-term collaboration What drives the growth of an open pension fund? A building block approach to retirement income design The actuarial sources of the rise in unfunded liabilities in America's defined benefit plans in the 21st century Introduction to the 20th Anniversary Special Issue of the Journal of Pension Economics and Finance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1