Comparison of the Effects of Oral Nizatidine versus Famotidine on Intragastric pH and Gastric Emptying in a Stress Rat Model

D. Yeom, Hyun Seok Choi, Min Seob Kim, Myeong Hwan Yu, Jisong You, M. Lee, Y. Kim
{"title":"Comparison of the Effects of Oral Nizatidine versus Famotidine on Intragastric pH and Gastric Emptying in a Stress Rat Model","authors":"D. Yeom, Hyun Seok Choi, Min Seob Kim, Myeong Hwan Yu, Jisong You, M. Lee, Y. Kim","doi":"10.7704/kjhugr.2022.0037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background/Aims: Histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RA) are used to treat acid-related disorders and functional dyspepsia. In contrast to other H2RAs, nizatidine promotes gastric emptying (GE). We investigated the effects of nizatidine and famotidine on intragastric pH and the GE rate in rats exposed to stress. Materials and Methods: We used 8-week-old male Wistar rats. Based on administration of water or drugs after an overnight fast, the animals were categorized into the nonstress-water, stress-water, stress-nizatidine, stress-famotidine, and stress-nizatidine with mosapride groups. The rats had access to pre-weighed food for 10 minutes, and those in the stress groups were exposed to 1 hour of restraint stress. Intragastric pH was measured under isoflurane anesthesia, and the GE rate was measured after the rats were sacrificed. Results: The GE rate was significantly lower in the stress-water and stress-famotidine groups than in the nonstress-water group. However, GE in the stress-nizatidine and stress-nizatidine with mosapride group did not significantly differ from that in the nonstress-water group. The GE rate was significantly higher in the stress-nizatidine with mosapride than in the stress-famotidine group. Intragastric pH was significantly higher in the stress-nizatidine and stress-famotidine groups than in the stress-water group. Nonetheless, there was no significant difference in pH between the stress-nizatidine and stress-famotidine groups. The intragastric pH was slightly but significantly higher in the stress-nizatidine with mosapride group than in the stress-nizatidine and stress-famotidine groups. Conclusions: In contrast to famotidine, nizatidine prevents stress-induced GE delay, which suggests that nizatidine is superior to other H2RAs for treatment of functional dyspepsia associated with delayed GE. (Korean J Helicobacter Up Gastrointest Res 2022;22: 288-294)","PeriodicalId":22895,"journal":{"name":"The Korean Journal of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Korean Journal of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7704/kjhugr.2022.0037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background/Aims: Histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RA) are used to treat acid-related disorders and functional dyspepsia. In contrast to other H2RAs, nizatidine promotes gastric emptying (GE). We investigated the effects of nizatidine and famotidine on intragastric pH and the GE rate in rats exposed to stress. Materials and Methods: We used 8-week-old male Wistar rats. Based on administration of water or drugs after an overnight fast, the animals were categorized into the nonstress-water, stress-water, stress-nizatidine, stress-famotidine, and stress-nizatidine with mosapride groups. The rats had access to pre-weighed food for 10 minutes, and those in the stress groups were exposed to 1 hour of restraint stress. Intragastric pH was measured under isoflurane anesthesia, and the GE rate was measured after the rats were sacrificed. Results: The GE rate was significantly lower in the stress-water and stress-famotidine groups than in the nonstress-water group. However, GE in the stress-nizatidine and stress-nizatidine with mosapride group did not significantly differ from that in the nonstress-water group. The GE rate was significantly higher in the stress-nizatidine with mosapride than in the stress-famotidine group. Intragastric pH was significantly higher in the stress-nizatidine and stress-famotidine groups than in the stress-water group. Nonetheless, there was no significant difference in pH between the stress-nizatidine and stress-famotidine groups. The intragastric pH was slightly but significantly higher in the stress-nizatidine with mosapride group than in the stress-nizatidine and stress-famotidine groups. Conclusions: In contrast to famotidine, nizatidine prevents stress-induced GE delay, which suggests that nizatidine is superior to other H2RAs for treatment of functional dyspepsia associated with delayed GE. (Korean J Helicobacter Up Gastrointest Res 2022;22: 288-294)
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼扎替丁和法莫替丁对应激大鼠胃内pH值和胃排空影响的比较
背景/目的:组胺-2受体拮抗剂(H2RA)用于治疗酸相关疾病和功能性消化不良。与其他H2RAs相比,尼扎替丁促进胃排空(GE)。研究了尼扎替丁和法莫替丁对应激大鼠胃内pH值和GE率的影响。材料与方法:选用8周龄雄性Wistar大鼠。根据禁食后水或药物的给药情况,将小鼠分为非应激水组、应激水组、应激尼扎替丁组、应激法莫替丁组和应激尼扎替丁加莫沙必利组。大鼠获得预先称重的食物10分钟,应激组的大鼠暴露在1小时的约束压力下。异氟醚麻醉下测定大鼠胃内pH值,处死后测定GE率。结果:应激-水组和应激-法莫替丁组的GE率明显低于非应激-水组。而胁迫-尼扎替丁组和胁迫-尼扎替丁加莫沙必利组的GE与非胁迫-水组无显著差异。莫沙必利加尼扎替丁组的GE率明显高于法莫替丁组。应激-尼扎替丁组和应激-法莫替丁组胃内pH值显著高于应激-水组。然而,胁迫-尼扎替丁组和胁迫-法莫替丁组之间的pH值没有显著差异。莫沙必利加尼扎替丁组胃内pH值略高于尼扎替丁和法莫替丁组。结论:与法莫替丁相比,尼扎替丁可以预防应激性GE延迟,这表明尼扎替丁在治疗延迟GE相关的功能性消化不良方面优于其他H2RAs。(韩国J Helicobacter Up Gastrointest, 2022;22: 288-294)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Rare Case of Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Arising on Duodenal Brunner’s Gland Hyperplasia Successfully Treated Via Endoscopic Resection Parasitic Diseases of Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Fungal Infection in Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Viral Infection in Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Comparison of Tegoprazan- and Lansoprazole-Based Fourteen-Day Triple Therapies as First-Line Treatments for Helicobacter pylori Eradication
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1