From Sherbrooke to Stratford and back again: Team teaching and experiential learning through “Shakesperience”

IF 1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Arts and Humanities in Higher Education Pub Date : 2020-03-12 DOI:10.1177/1474022220910362
J. Riddell, S. Murray, L. Dickson
{"title":"From Sherbrooke to Stratford and back again: Team teaching and experiential learning through “Shakesperience”","authors":"J. Riddell, S. Murray, L. Dickson","doi":"10.1177/1474022220910362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Attempting to teach theater in an English Literature course is a daunting prospect. A far cry from the highly individual experience of reading a novel or poem, theater is both a visual and communal kind of engagement. It is a challenge to capture this medium in a traditional lecture-based classroom and harder still to convey its three-dimensionality to undergraduate students. In this paper, we argue that experiential learning and team teaching are especially resonant in the exploration of Shakespearean studies because of the active and collaborative nature of his theater and plays. This paper draws out avenues for experiential learning in the humanities that should have broad applicability and interest a wide range of readers. Framing our design, implementation, and critical reflection in the relevant research, we provide an example of how to anchor experiential learning in the humanities in practice. The case study outlines a compact spring session course on Shakespeare’s plays and performance that includes in-class, online, and field study components. Our research reveals that this approach mirrors in several key ways the collaborative work at the heart of Shakespearean drama and of theater more generally: students are exposed to the plays on the page, on the stage, and behind the scenes; they are offered a model of collaborative knowledge-making both in the theater and in the team-based course design and delivery; and, with these examples before them, they are encouraged to take risks, to collaborate, and to form communities of their own in their learning. In the conclusion we devote attention to funding and the cost associated with experiential learning and field courses. This paper explores experiential learning and field-based immersive learning into the context of disciplinary-specific humanities classrooms with the goal of increasing interaction among students and enhancing students’ learning (Béchard and Pelletier, 2001).","PeriodicalId":45787,"journal":{"name":"Arts and Humanities in Higher Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1474022220910362","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arts and Humanities in Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022220910362","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Attempting to teach theater in an English Literature course is a daunting prospect. A far cry from the highly individual experience of reading a novel or poem, theater is both a visual and communal kind of engagement. It is a challenge to capture this medium in a traditional lecture-based classroom and harder still to convey its three-dimensionality to undergraduate students. In this paper, we argue that experiential learning and team teaching are especially resonant in the exploration of Shakespearean studies because of the active and collaborative nature of his theater and plays. This paper draws out avenues for experiential learning in the humanities that should have broad applicability and interest a wide range of readers. Framing our design, implementation, and critical reflection in the relevant research, we provide an example of how to anchor experiential learning in the humanities in practice. The case study outlines a compact spring session course on Shakespeare’s plays and performance that includes in-class, online, and field study components. Our research reveals that this approach mirrors in several key ways the collaborative work at the heart of Shakespearean drama and of theater more generally: students are exposed to the plays on the page, on the stage, and behind the scenes; they are offered a model of collaborative knowledge-making both in the theater and in the team-based course design and delivery; and, with these examples before them, they are encouraged to take risks, to collaborate, and to form communities of their own in their learning. In the conclusion we devote attention to funding and the cost associated with experiential learning and field courses. This paper explores experiential learning and field-based immersive learning into the context of disciplinary-specific humanities classrooms with the goal of increasing interaction among students and enhancing students’ learning (Béchard and Pelletier, 2001).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从舍布鲁克到斯特拉特福德再回来:通过“莎士比亚体验”进行团队教学和体验学习
试图在英国文学课程中教授戏剧是一个令人望而生畏的前景。与阅读小说或诗歌的高度个人体验相去甚远,戏剧既是一种视觉体验,也是一种公共体验。在传统的以讲座为基础的课堂上捕捉这种媒介是一个挑战,而向本科生传达它的三维性则更加困难。在本文中,我们认为体验式学习和团队教学在探索莎士比亚的研究中特别能引起共鸣,因为他的戏剧和戏剧具有积极和合作的性质。本文提出了人文学科体验式学习的途径,应该具有广泛的适用性和广泛的读者兴趣。在相关研究中构建我们的设计、实施和批判性反思,我们提供了一个如何在实践中锚定人文学科体验式学习的例子。该案例研究概述了莎士比亚戏剧和表演的紧凑春季课程,包括课堂,在线和实地研究组成部分。我们的研究表明,这种方法在几个关键方面反映了莎士比亚戏剧和更广泛的戏剧的核心合作:学生在书本上、舞台上和幕后接触戏剧;在剧院和基于团队的课程设计和交付中,为他们提供了一种协作知识制造模式;有了这些例子,他们被鼓励去冒险,去合作,在学习中形成自己的社区。在结论中,我们关注与体验式学习和实地课程相关的资金和成本。本文探讨了体验式学习和基于实地的沉浸式学习在特定学科人文课堂的背景下,目的是增加学生之间的互动,提高学生的学习(bsamhad和Pelletier, 2001)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Arts and Humanities in Higher Education
Arts and Humanities in Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Arts and Humanities in Higher Education seeks to: Publish high quality articles that bring critical research to the fore and stimulate debate. Serve the community of arts and humanities educators internationally, by publishing significant opinion and research into contemporary issues of teaching and learning within the domain. These will include enquiries into policy, the curriculum and appropriate forms of assessment, as well as developments in method such as electronic modes of scholarship and course delivery.
期刊最新文献
Design and evaluation of Enthralled: A higher education conversation game based on Euripides’ Bacchae Racial discourses and colonial education policy: The discursive construction of education development at a historically white South African university Mind the gap: A scoping review of skills gaps for graduates in the creative industries On the border between play and art: A collaborative self-study of 76 playful didactic designs in higher education Arts employability and extracurricular communities of practice: A case study of the University of Melbourne’s creative community connections
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1