Analysis of Liquid Loading and Sandness in Gas Wells A1, A2 And Their Correction with The Plunger Lift Method in Field B

Ali Musnal, Richa Melysa
{"title":"Analysis of Liquid Loading and Sandness in Gas Wells A1, A2 And Their Correction with The Plunger Lift Method in Field B","authors":"Ali Musnal, Richa Melysa","doi":"10.25299/jeee.2023.11083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The inability of the gas to lift liquid to the surface causes liquid to accumulate in the downhole, this event is called liquid loading, and sand deposits at the bottom of the well are caused to be swept away by the gas flow. If a well has liquid loading and sandification, well production will decrease and even the well will die. For this reason, it is necessary to carry out a predictive analysis of the well and a method to overcome the problem of liquid loading and sandiness using a plunger lift.Liquid loading is not always easy to identify, because the well is still producing significantly. The method used in the petroleum world to identify liquid loading is the \"Turner et al\" method. The plunger is a piston-type device that moves freely in the tubing and according to the inside diameter of the pipe, rising when the well pressure is sufficient to lift it and moving back down due to the force of gravity. The plunger lifting system uses gas pressure buildup in the well to lift the accumulated liquid column out of the well. The researcher conducted a liquid loading analysis on well A1 and well A2. From the results of the study it was identified that well A1 did not experience liquid loading, because the calculation results showed that the well's critical gas flow rate was 3.3 MMSCFPD which was less than the actual gas flow rate of 5 MMSCFPD. Well A2 is experiencing liquid loading, because the results of the calculation of the well's critical gas flow rate are 3.6 MMSCFPD, while the actual gas flow rate in the field is 3MMSCFPD.After removal of fluid and sand from the bottom of the well, the production rate of the A2 gas well increased to 5 MMSCFPD.","PeriodicalId":33635,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Earth Energy Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Earth Energy Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25299/jeee.2023.11083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The inability of the gas to lift liquid to the surface causes liquid to accumulate in the downhole, this event is called liquid loading, and sand deposits at the bottom of the well are caused to be swept away by the gas flow. If a well has liquid loading and sandification, well production will decrease and even the well will die. For this reason, it is necessary to carry out a predictive analysis of the well and a method to overcome the problem of liquid loading and sandiness using a plunger lift.Liquid loading is not always easy to identify, because the well is still producing significantly. The method used in the petroleum world to identify liquid loading is the "Turner et al" method. The plunger is a piston-type device that moves freely in the tubing and according to the inside diameter of the pipe, rising when the well pressure is sufficient to lift it and moving back down due to the force of gravity. The plunger lifting system uses gas pressure buildup in the well to lift the accumulated liquid column out of the well. The researcher conducted a liquid loading analysis on well A1 and well A2. From the results of the study it was identified that well A1 did not experience liquid loading, because the calculation results showed that the well's critical gas flow rate was 3.3 MMSCFPD which was less than the actual gas flow rate of 5 MMSCFPD. Well A2 is experiencing liquid loading, because the results of the calculation of the well's critical gas flow rate are 3.6 MMSCFPD, while the actual gas flow rate in the field is 3MMSCFPD.After removal of fluid and sand from the bottom of the well, the production rate of the A2 gas well increased to 5 MMSCFPD.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
B油田A1、A2气井含液量、含砂量分析及柱塞举升法修正
由于气体无法将液体抬升到地面,导致液体在井下积聚,这一事件被称为液体载荷,导致井底的沉积物被气体冲走。如果一口井有液体负荷和砂化,那么一口井的产量将会下降,甚至会死亡。因此,有必要对该井进行预测分析,并找到一种方法来克服柱塞举升的液体载荷和含砂问题。由于油井仍在大量生产,因此液体负荷并不总是容易识别。石油世界中用于识别液体载荷的方法是“特纳等人”方法。柱塞是一种活塞式装置,它在油管中根据管道内径自由移动,当井压足以将其抬起时,柱塞就会上升,并在重力作用下向下移动。柱塞举升系统利用井内积聚的气体压力将积累的液体举升出井外。研究人员对A1井和A2井进行了液体载荷分析。从研究结果来看,A1井没有发生液体加载,因为计算结果表明该井的临界气体流量为3.3 MMSCFPD,小于实际的5 MMSCFPD。由于A2井的临界气体流量计算结果为3.6 MMSCFPD,而现场的实际气体流量为3MMSCFPD,因此A2井正在经历液体加载。在去除井底的流体和砂后,A2气井的产量增加到5 MMSCFPD。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
APPLICATION OF PSO-LSSVM IN PREDICTION AND ANALYSIS OF SLOW DRILLING (RATE OF PENETRATION) EVALUATION OF CONTINUOUS AND WATER ALTERNATING GAS (WAG) CO2 INJECTION ON X FIELD RECOVERY FACTOR The Effect of Different Gas Water Ratio on Recovery Factor and CO2 Storage Capacity in Water Alternating Gas Injection. A Case Study: “V” Field Development, North Sea Oil Formation Volume Factor Prediction Using Artificial Neural Network: A Case Study of Niger Delta Crudes Fracturing Fluid Optimization in Limestone Formation Using Guar Gum Crosslinked Fluid
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1