Long-acting depot buprenorphine in people who are homeless: Views and experiences

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment Pub Date : 2022-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jsat.2022.108781
Catriona Matheson, Rebecca Foster, Joe Schofield, Tania Browne
{"title":"Long-acting depot buprenorphine in people who are homeless: Views and experiences","authors":"Catriona Matheson,&nbsp;Rebecca Foster,&nbsp;Joe Schofield,&nbsp;Tania Browne","doi":"10.1016/j.jsat.2022.108781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>People experiencing homelessness often experience intersecting mental and physical health problems, alongside problem substance use and a range of overlapping challenges, including access to appropriate treatment. New long-acting opioid replacement therapies (ORT) offer potential benefits for this group. This study explored the views of people who are homeless and dependent on prescribed or illicit opiates/opioids on the range of ORT delivery options, including long-acting buprenorphine (LAB) depot injection, methadone liquid, and sublingual/wafer buprenorphine.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The research team conducted three focus groups (<em>n</em> = 9 participants) and individual interviews (<em>n</em> = 20) with people living in Scotland and Wales. We sought to explore participants' experiences and views on a range of ORT options, and to explore experiences and perceptions of the acceptability and utility of LAB for this group.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty-nine people participated (8 women, 21 men) and described experiences of poor mental health and interaction with the criminal justice system, including prison. All had experience of ORT and some had a preference for the “comfort” of methadone while others liked the clear headedness of buprenorphine. Participants saw LAB as a valuable addition to the treatment options. Potential benefits included freedom from the challenges associated with daily dispensing and the freedom to be able to attend to their priorities and regain control over their day-to-day lives. LAB naïve participants required reassurance regarding the duration of effect and wanted information and evidence from both their health care providers and their peers.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Participants generally recognized the potential of LAB. The research team identified crucial themes for those experiencing homelessness: emotions, trust, and time. A move to LAB represents a shift in the locus of control to the individual, which, for some is exciting, but for others is daunting. Providers should address this shift in control, and it must to be central to joint decision-making on whether someone is ready for LAB, the information they require to help them decide, and the support they will require during treatment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17148,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment","volume":"139 ","pages":"Article 108781"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740547222000630/pdfft?md5=b66b2e2f70d9b99dc3bab535fd7263c3&pid=1-s2.0-S0740547222000630-main.pdf","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740547222000630","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Introduction

People experiencing homelessness often experience intersecting mental and physical health problems, alongside problem substance use and a range of overlapping challenges, including access to appropriate treatment. New long-acting opioid replacement therapies (ORT) offer potential benefits for this group. This study explored the views of people who are homeless and dependent on prescribed or illicit opiates/opioids on the range of ORT delivery options, including long-acting buprenorphine (LAB) depot injection, methadone liquid, and sublingual/wafer buprenorphine.

Methods

The research team conducted three focus groups (n = 9 participants) and individual interviews (n = 20) with people living in Scotland and Wales. We sought to explore participants' experiences and views on a range of ORT options, and to explore experiences and perceptions of the acceptability and utility of LAB for this group.

Results

Twenty-nine people participated (8 women, 21 men) and described experiences of poor mental health and interaction with the criminal justice system, including prison. All had experience of ORT and some had a preference for the “comfort” of methadone while others liked the clear headedness of buprenorphine. Participants saw LAB as a valuable addition to the treatment options. Potential benefits included freedom from the challenges associated with daily dispensing and the freedom to be able to attend to their priorities and regain control over their day-to-day lives. LAB naïve participants required reassurance regarding the duration of effect and wanted information and evidence from both their health care providers and their peers.

Conclusion

Participants generally recognized the potential of LAB. The research team identified crucial themes for those experiencing homelessness: emotions, trust, and time. A move to LAB represents a shift in the locus of control to the individual, which, for some is exciting, but for others is daunting. Providers should address this shift in control, and it must to be central to joint decision-making on whether someone is ready for LAB, the information they require to help them decide, and the support they will require during treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无家可归者的长效仓库丁丙诺啡:观点和经验。
无家可归的人往往遇到精神和身体健康问题交织在一起,此外还有问题药物使用和一系列重叠的挑战,包括获得适当治疗的机会。新的长效阿片类药物替代疗法(ORT)为这一群体提供了潜在的益处。本研究探讨了无家可归者和依赖处方或非法阿片类药物/阿片类药物的人对ORT递送选择范围的看法,包括长效丁丙诺啡(LAB)储存注射,美沙酮液体和舌下/威化丁丙诺啡。方法研究小组对生活在苏格兰和威尔士的人进行了三个焦点小组(n = 9)和个人访谈(n = 20)。我们试图探索参与者对一系列ORT选择的经验和观点,并探索这一群体对LAB的可接受性和效用的经验和看法。结果共有29人(8名女性,21名男性)描述了心理健康状况不佳以及与刑事司法系统(包括监狱)互动的经历。所有人都有ORT的经验,有些人更喜欢美沙酮的“舒适”,而另一些人则喜欢丁丙诺啡的清醒。参与者认为LAB是治疗方案的一个有价值的补充。潜在的好处包括摆脱与日常配药相关的挑战,能够自由地处理他们的优先事项并重新控制他们的日常生活。LAB naïve参与者需要对效果持续时间的保证,并希望从他们的卫生保健提供者和他们的同伴那里获得信息和证据。结论与会人员普遍认可LAB的潜力。研究小组确定了无家可归者的关键主题:情感、信任和时间。搬到实验室代表着控制权转移到个人身上,这对一些人来说是令人兴奋的,但对另一些人来说是令人生畏的。提供者应该解决这种控制的转变,并且必须将其作为共同决策的核心,即某人是否准备好了LAB,他们需要帮助他们决定的信息,以及他们在治疗期间需要的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.30%
发文量
220
期刊介绍: The Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment (JSAT) features original reviews, training and educational articles, special commentary, and especially research articles that are meaningful to the treatment of alcohol, heroin, marijuana, and other drugs of dependence. JSAT is directed toward treatment practitioners from all disciplines (medicine, nursing, social work, psychology, and counseling) in both private and public sectors, including those involved in schools, health centers, community agencies, correctional facilities, and individual practices. The editors emphasize that JSAT articles should address techniques and treatment approaches that can be used directly by contemporary practitioners.
期刊最新文献
Not in my treatment center: Leadership's perception of barriers to MOUD adoption Peer support to reduce readmission in Medicaid-enrolled adults with substance use disorder National trends in buprenorphine prescribing before and during the COVID-19 pandemic A qualitative analysis of barriers to opioid agonist treatment for racial/ethnic minoritized populations An intervention pilot to facilitate harm reduction service decentralization in Vietnam
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1