Metacognitive awareness and academic locus of control as the predictors of academic adjustment

Q4 Psychology Polish Psychological Bulletin Pub Date : 2023-07-19 DOI:10.24425/119512
D. Jain, Gyanesh Kumar Tiwari, I. Awasthi
{"title":"Metacognitive awareness and academic locus of control as the predictors of academic adjustment","authors":"D. Jain, Gyanesh Kumar Tiwari, I. Awasthi","doi":"10.24425/119512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study attempted to examine the impacts of academic locus of control and metacognitive awareness on the academic adjustment of the student participants. The convenient sampling was applied to select the sample of 368 participants comprising 246 internals with age ranging from 17 to 28 years (M = 20.52, SD = 2.10) and 122 externals with age spanning from 17 to 28 years (M = 20.57, SD = 2.08). The findings indicated that there were significant differences in the various dimensions of metacognition, academic lifestyle and academic achievement of the internals and externals except for academic motivation and overall academic adjustment. There were significant gender differences in declarative knowledge, procedural knowledge, conditional knowledge, planning, information management, monitoring, evaluation and overall metacognitive awareness. Likewise, the internals and externals differed significantly in their mean scores of declarative knowledge, procedural knowledge, conditional knowledge, planning, information management, monitoring, debugging, evaluation and overall metacognitive awareness, academic lifestyle and academic achievement. The significant positive correlations existed between the scores of metacognitive awareness and academic adjustment. It was evident that the internal academic locus of control and metacognitive awareness were significant predictors of academic adjustment of the students. The findings have been discussed in the light of recent findings of the field. The findings of the study have significant implications to understand the academic success and adjustment of the students and thus, relevant for teachers, educationists, policy makers and parents. The future directions for the researchers and limitations of the study have also been discussed.","PeriodicalId":38657,"journal":{"name":"Polish Psychological Bulletin","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Psychological Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24425/119512","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study attempted to examine the impacts of academic locus of control and metacognitive awareness on the academic adjustment of the student participants. The convenient sampling was applied to select the sample of 368 participants comprising 246 internals with age ranging from 17 to 28 years (M = 20.52, SD = 2.10) and 122 externals with age spanning from 17 to 28 years (M = 20.57, SD = 2.08). The findings indicated that there were significant differences in the various dimensions of metacognition, academic lifestyle and academic achievement of the internals and externals except for academic motivation and overall academic adjustment. There were significant gender differences in declarative knowledge, procedural knowledge, conditional knowledge, planning, information management, monitoring, evaluation and overall metacognitive awareness. Likewise, the internals and externals differed significantly in their mean scores of declarative knowledge, procedural knowledge, conditional knowledge, planning, information management, monitoring, debugging, evaluation and overall metacognitive awareness, academic lifestyle and academic achievement. The significant positive correlations existed between the scores of metacognitive awareness and academic adjustment. It was evident that the internal academic locus of control and metacognitive awareness were significant predictors of academic adjustment of the students. The findings have been discussed in the light of recent findings of the field. The findings of the study have significant implications to understand the academic success and adjustment of the students and thus, relevant for teachers, educationists, policy makers and parents. The future directions for the researchers and limitations of the study have also been discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
元认知意识和学业控制源对学业适应的影响
本研究旨在探讨学业控制源和元认知意识对学生学业适应的影响。采用方便抽样法,选取368名参与者,其中内部人员246人,年龄17 ~ 28岁(M = 20.52, SD = 2.10),外部人员122人,年龄17 ~ 28岁(M = 20.57, SD = 2.08)。研究结果表明,除学业动机和整体学业适应外,内外生在元认知、学业生活方式和学业成就等各维度上均存在显著差异。在陈述性知识、程序性知识、条件性知识、计划、信息管理、监测、评价和整体元认知意识方面存在显著的性别差异。同样,在陈述性知识、程序性知识、条件性知识、计划、信息管理、监测、调试、评价和整体元认知意识、学术生活方式和学业成绩的平均得分上,内向型学生和外向型学生也存在显著差异。元认知意识得分与学业适应得分呈显著正相关。内部学业控制源和元认知意识是学生学业适应的显著预测因子。这些发现已根据该领域的最新发现进行了讨论。本研究的发现对理解学生的学业成功和适应具有重要意义,因此对教师、教育工作者、政策制定者和家长具有重要意义。并对今后的研究方向和研究的局限性进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Polish Psychological Bulletin
Polish Psychological Bulletin Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Disrupt Pique Technique: When Disrupting First Increases the Effectiveness of the Pique Technique How is objectification related to a devaluation of people in the workplace? Effective emotion regulation as a protective factor of depression symptoms in Slovak adolescents during a COVID-19 pandemic Is the ambiguity of emotion multidimensional? The ambiguous valence, activation and origin of emotions Linking Work Events with Work Engagement: Mediating Role of Emotions and Moderating Role of Psychological Capital
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1