Digital Innovations and Smart Solutions for Society and Economy: Pros and Cons

IF 0.4 Q4 MANAGEMENT Foundations of Management Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.2478/fman-2021-0008
M. Sikorski
{"title":"Digital Innovations and Smart Solutions for Society and Economy: Pros and Cons","authors":"M. Sikorski","doi":"10.2478/fman-2021-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Recent developments in artificial intelligence (AI) may involve significant potential threats to personal data privacy, national security, and social and economic stability. AI-based solutions are often promoted as “intelligent” or “smart” because they are autonomous in optimizing various processes. Because they can modify their behavior without human supervision by analyzing data from the environment, AI-based systems may be more prone to malfunctions and malicious activities than conventional software systems. Moreover, due to existing regulatory gaps, development and operation of AI-based products are not yet subject to adequate risk management and administrative supervision. Resonating to recent reports about potential threats resulting from AI-based systems, this paper presents an outline of a prospective risk assessment for adaptive and autonomous products. This research resulted in extensive catalogs of possible damages, initiating events, and preventive policies that can be useful for risk managers involved in conducting risk assessment procedures for AI-based systems. The paper concludes with the analysis and discussion of changes in business, legal, and institutional environments required to ensure the public that AI-based solutions can be trusted, are transparent and safe, and can improve the quality of life.","PeriodicalId":43250,"journal":{"name":"Foundations of Management","volume":"13 1","pages":"103 - 116"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foundations of Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/fman-2021-0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Recent developments in artificial intelligence (AI) may involve significant potential threats to personal data privacy, national security, and social and economic stability. AI-based solutions are often promoted as “intelligent” or “smart” because they are autonomous in optimizing various processes. Because they can modify their behavior without human supervision by analyzing data from the environment, AI-based systems may be more prone to malfunctions and malicious activities than conventional software systems. Moreover, due to existing regulatory gaps, development and operation of AI-based products are not yet subject to adequate risk management and administrative supervision. Resonating to recent reports about potential threats resulting from AI-based systems, this paper presents an outline of a prospective risk assessment for adaptive and autonomous products. This research resulted in extensive catalogs of possible damages, initiating events, and preventive policies that can be useful for risk managers involved in conducting risk assessment procedures for AI-based systems. The paper concludes with the analysis and discussion of changes in business, legal, and institutional environments required to ensure the public that AI-based solutions can be trusted, are transparent and safe, and can improve the quality of life.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会和经济的数字创新和智能解决方案:利弊
摘要人工智能(AI)的最新发展可能对个人数据隐私、国家安全以及社会和经济稳定构成重大潜在威胁。基于人工智能的解决方案通常被宣传为“智能”或“智能”,因为它们在优化各种流程方面是自主的。因为它们可以在没有人类监督的情况下通过分析来自环境的数据来修改自己的行为,基于人工智能的系统可能比传统的软件系统更容易发生故障和恶意活动。此外,由于存在监管空白,人工智能产品的开发和运营尚未受到足够的风险管理和行政监管。与最近关于基于人工智能的系统产生的潜在威胁的报告相呼应,本文概述了自适应和自主产品的前瞻性风险评估。这项研究得出了可能的损害、启动事件和预防政策的广泛目录,这对参与进行基于人工智能系统的风险评估程序的风险管理人员很有用。本文最后分析和讨论了商业、法律和制度环境的变化,以确保公众相信基于人工智能的解决方案是透明和安全的,并能提高生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Analysis of Cluster Support Based on the Example of the European Cluster Excellence Initiative The Method of Determining the Technical Costs of Manufacturing Products Contemporary Consumer Trends A Few Notes On Art Auctions Critical Understanding of Existing Entrepreneurial Marketing Models: 2002 – 2022
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1