Некоторые замечания об оценке знаний студентов университетов

Darya I. Yareshchenko
{"title":"Некоторые замечания об оценке знаний студентов университетов","authors":"Darya I. Yareshchenko","doi":"10.21686/1818-4243-2017-4-66-72","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is devoted to the study and modeling of the process of acquiring knowledge by students at the University. The main task of the work is the construction process of acquiring knowledge by a student and its analysis to determine an individual approach to the student. This paper considers the simplest case of the construction of the process of knowledge acquisition by students, which leads to the initial description of the process of knowledge acquisition. The description of the process of acquiring knowledge and the control scheme of its variables are considered. The initial data for the task will be the results of student surveys, conducted throughout the semester in some groups. The training sample was obtained as a result of such surveys for each student. This sample was used to construct a model for obtaining knowledge by the student. From a mathematical point of view, such a problem is close to the task of reconstructing a function from observations. Two approaches exist for solving this problem: parametric and nonparametric. The parametric approach consists in choosing the form of the function up to a vector of parameters and the subsequent evaluation of these coefficients by a training sample. Thus, a certain equation will correspond to each student of the group and equation will differ from others by its coefficients. A nonparametric approach does not require preliminary parametrization of the model, and needs only some qualitative properties of the latter. This follows from the fact that nonparametric approximations belong to the class of local. Therefore, each student at the end of the experiment will have his curve of the process of acquiring knowledge, and accordingly his own equation of the educational process (a kind of a “visiting card” at the moment). Of course, the learning process for each student will be different, despite the fact that studying a new discipline starts at the same time. So, more diligent and interested in teaching students start studying the material as it is received, while others stretch the process until the end of the semester. The paper compares and analyzes of the process of acquiring knowledge for students of different levels (successful, intermediate and unsuccessful level of students’ knowledge). Thus, in the analysis process of the student “visiting card” we can see as students acquire the knowledge. In this article the modeling of the process of knowledge acquisition among students at the University is considered from a general point of view. Of course, it is important to develop education indicators, their analysis and evaluation. These sets of indicators help us to see how students study at Universities, and possibly find weaknesses, gaps in knowledge that need to be corrected. Also analyzing the similar “visiting card” of a student, the lecturer can correct your individual approach to his learning.","PeriodicalId":55672,"journal":{"name":"Otkrytoe Obrazovanie Moskva","volume":"21 1","pages":"66-72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otkrytoe Obrazovanie Moskva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21686/1818-4243-2017-4-66-72","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article is devoted to the study and modeling of the process of acquiring knowledge by students at the University. The main task of the work is the construction process of acquiring knowledge by a student and its analysis to determine an individual approach to the student. This paper considers the simplest case of the construction of the process of knowledge acquisition by students, which leads to the initial description of the process of knowledge acquisition. The description of the process of acquiring knowledge and the control scheme of its variables are considered. The initial data for the task will be the results of student surveys, conducted throughout the semester in some groups. The training sample was obtained as a result of such surveys for each student. This sample was used to construct a model for obtaining knowledge by the student. From a mathematical point of view, such a problem is close to the task of reconstructing a function from observations. Two approaches exist for solving this problem: parametric and nonparametric. The parametric approach consists in choosing the form of the function up to a vector of parameters and the subsequent evaluation of these coefficients by a training sample. Thus, a certain equation will correspond to each student of the group and equation will differ from others by its coefficients. A nonparametric approach does not require preliminary parametrization of the model, and needs only some qualitative properties of the latter. This follows from the fact that nonparametric approximations belong to the class of local. Therefore, each student at the end of the experiment will have his curve of the process of acquiring knowledge, and accordingly his own equation of the educational process (a kind of a “visiting card” at the moment). Of course, the learning process for each student will be different, despite the fact that studying a new discipline starts at the same time. So, more diligent and interested in teaching students start studying the material as it is received, while others stretch the process until the end of the semester. The paper compares and analyzes of the process of acquiring knowledge for students of different levels (successful, intermediate and unsuccessful level of students’ knowledge). Thus, in the analysis process of the student “visiting card” we can see as students acquire the knowledge. In this article the modeling of the process of knowledge acquisition among students at the University is considered from a general point of view. Of course, it is important to develop education indicators, their analysis and evaluation. These sets of indicators help us to see how students study at Universities, and possibly find weaknesses, gaps in knowledge that need to be corrected. Also analyzing the similar “visiting card” of a student, the lecturer can correct your individual approach to his learning.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于大学生知识评估的一些评论
本文致力于对该大学学生获取知识的过程进行研究和建模。这项工作的主要任务是学生获取知识的构建过程及其分析,以确定对学生的个人方法。本文考虑了学生知识获取过程的最简单的构建案例,从而对知识获取过程进行了初步描述。考虑了知识获取过程的描述及其变量的控制方案。该任务的初始数据将是学生调查的结果,这些调查在整个学期中以一些小组的形式进行。培训样本是对每个学生进行此类调查的结果。该样本用于构建学生获取知识的模型。从数学的角度来看,这样的问题接近于从观测中重建函数的任务。解决这个问题有两种方法:参数方法和非参数方法。参数方法包括选择直到参数向量的函数形式,以及随后通过训练样本对这些系数进行评估。因此,某个方程将对应于该组的每个学生,并且该方程与其他方程的系数不同。非参数方法不需要对模型进行初步参数化,只需要后者的一些定性性质。这源于非参数近似属于局部类的事实。因此,每个学生在实验结束时都会有自己的知识获取过程曲线,以及相应的教育过程方程(目前是一种“名片”)。当然,每个学生的学习过程都是不同的,尽管学习一门新学科是在同一时间开始的。因此,更勤奋、更感兴趣的学生在收到材料时就开始学习,而其他人则将学习过程延长到学期末。本文比较分析了不同层次(成功、中等和不成功三个层次)学生的知识获取过程。因此,在对学生“名片”的分析过程中,我们可以看到学生对知识的获取。在本文中,从一般的角度考虑了大学学生知识获取过程的建模。当然,制定教育指标及其分析和评估也很重要。这些指标有助于我们了解学生在大学的学习情况,并可能发现需要纠正的弱点和知识差距。通过分析学生的类似“名片”,讲师可以纠正你的个人学习方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Investigation of Weight Gain and Affecting Factors in Kidney Transplant Recipients in the First 2 Years After Transplant. Perception of Space in the Traditional and Virtual Classroom Modernization of the Educational Demonstration Stand as A Way to Improve the Quality of Practical Training of Future Engineers Optimization of the Pedagogical Process in Teaching Chemistry to First-Year Students of the Ural State Medical University Digital Competence Profiles in Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1