The effects of a place-based tax cut and minimum wage increase on labor market outcomes

IF 0.9 Q3 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR IZA Journal of Labor Policy Pub Date : 2020-03-01 DOI:10.2478/izajolp-2020-0012
Raymundo M. Campos‐Vazquez, V. Delgado, Alexis Rodas
{"title":"The effects of a place-based tax cut and minimum wage increase on labor market outcomes","authors":"Raymundo M. Campos‐Vazquez, V. Delgado, Alexis Rodas","doi":"10.2478/izajolp-2020-0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The benefits of place-based policies are still under debate. In this study, we analyze what is probably one of the boldest interventions in the recent history of Mexico and the rest of the world: the Northern Border Free Zone (NBFZ). Launched in January 2019, this program doubles the minimum wage and substantially lowers taxes in 43 municipalities along the border with the United States, aiming to improve living standards for low-wage workers and foster economic activity within the region. Given the unique features of the NBFZ, we estimate its short-run effects on labor outcomes: employment, wages, and formality. Our primary identification strategy follows a synthetic control method employing monthly administrative data at the municipality level for the period 2015–2019. Using administrative data for formal employment, we find that the policy substantially increased labor income in the NBFZ by approximately 9% over the control municipalities. The results for employment are less clear. Formal employment showed 1.6% less growth in the NBFZ than in the control municipalities, but the estimate is imprecise and we cannot reject a null impact of the program on employment. These results are robust to alternative control groups, including metropolitan areas in the United States. We also use the labor force survey to estimate the effects on formality at the individual level and find results closer to a null effect. These two results suggest that the NBFZ did not substantially affect employment, and the intersection of confidence intervals for the two estimates implies a maximum loss of employment of approximately 24,000 jobs.","PeriodicalId":45367,"journal":{"name":"IZA Journal of Labor Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IZA Journal of Labor Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/izajolp-2020-0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract The benefits of place-based policies are still under debate. In this study, we analyze what is probably one of the boldest interventions in the recent history of Mexico and the rest of the world: the Northern Border Free Zone (NBFZ). Launched in January 2019, this program doubles the minimum wage and substantially lowers taxes in 43 municipalities along the border with the United States, aiming to improve living standards for low-wage workers and foster economic activity within the region. Given the unique features of the NBFZ, we estimate its short-run effects on labor outcomes: employment, wages, and formality. Our primary identification strategy follows a synthetic control method employing monthly administrative data at the municipality level for the period 2015–2019. Using administrative data for formal employment, we find that the policy substantially increased labor income in the NBFZ by approximately 9% over the control municipalities. The results for employment are less clear. Formal employment showed 1.6% less growth in the NBFZ than in the control municipalities, but the estimate is imprecise and we cannot reject a null impact of the program on employment. These results are robust to alternative control groups, including metropolitan areas in the United States. We also use the labor force survey to estimate the effects on formality at the individual level and find results closer to a null effect. These two results suggest that the NBFZ did not substantially affect employment, and the intersection of confidence intervals for the two estimates implies a maximum loss of employment of approximately 24,000 jobs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于地方的减税和提高最低工资对劳动力市场结果的影响
摘要基于地方的政策的好处仍在争论中。在这项研究中,我们分析了墨西哥和世界其他地区近代史上最大胆的干预措施之一:北部边境自由区(NBFZ)。该计划于2019年1月启动,在与美国接壤的43个城市将最低工资提高了一倍,并大幅降低了税收,旨在提高低工资工人的生活水平,促进该地区的经济活动。考虑到NBFZ的独特特征,我们估计了其对劳动力结果的短期影响:就业、工资和手续。我们的主要识别策略采用了一种综合控制方法,该方法采用了2015-2019年市级的月度行政数据。使用正式就业的行政数据,我们发现该政策使NBFZ的劳动力收入比控制城市大幅增加了约9%。就业的结果不太清楚。NBFZ的正式就业增长率比控制城市低1.6%,但估计不准确,我们不能拒绝该计划对就业的零影响。这些结果对包括美国大都市地区在内的其他对照组来说是稳健的。我们还使用劳动力调查来估计个人层面对正式性的影响,并发现结果更接近零效应。这两个结果表明,NBFZ并没有对就业产生实质性影响,两个估计值的置信区间交叉意味着最大就业损失约为24000个工作岗位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IZA Journal of Labor Policy
IZA Journal of Labor Policy INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The IZA Journal of Labor Policy publishes scientific articles that are relevant for policy-making. This refers to papers addressing the impact of institutional settings and policy interventions on labor market outcomes, both from a theoretical as well as from an empirical point of view. In addition, the IZA Journal of Labor Policy publishes literature reviews and meta-analyses that synthesize existing research on policy relevant issues.
期刊最新文献
The distributional effects of the pension system reform in Poland Minimum wage and collective bargaining shocks: a narrative database for advanced economies Job Protection — It is Good to be an Insider The effects of more intensive counseling for disadvantaged unemployed youth Explaining the Evolution of Job Tenure in Europe, 1995–2020
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1