Use of reference management software among Allopathy, Ayurveda, and Homeopathy practices

IF 0.2 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Indian Journal of Medical Specialities Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.4103/injms.injms_95_22
Ellora Barman, B. Barman, A. Nune, A. Nongpiur
{"title":"Use of reference management software among Allopathy, Ayurveda, and Homeopathy practices","authors":"Ellora Barman, B. Barman, A. Nune, A. Nongpiur","doi":"10.4103/injms.injms_95_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Reference management software (RMS) enable researchers to organize and manage large number of references that are typically identified during the publication of research articles. Aims and Objectives: The purpose of our study was to determine the extent to which faculties from allopathy, homeopathy, and Ayurveda use RMS for their academic pursuits and to identify which methods are used most frequently. Methods: The survey was circulated among the faculties of three different disciplines of the health-care system to collect respondent demographic details and questionnaire responses. Data distribution and variable type were used to perform descriptive analysis. Results: The data from 114/150 respondents were analyzed. Of the 114 faculties who responded to our survey, 72 (63%) reported using RMS to publish their articles. Knowledge of how to use RMS software is common in allopathic faculties (40%), followed by homeopathy (14%) and Ayurveda (9%). Zotero (41%) is the most popular RMS software among users, followed by Mendeley (31%) and Endnote (12%). Conclusion: Despite being underreported, RMS software is frequently used for the needs of authors from various disciplines in the health-care system.","PeriodicalId":43811,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Medical Specialities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Medical Specialities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/injms.injms_95_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Reference management software (RMS) enable researchers to organize and manage large number of references that are typically identified during the publication of research articles. Aims and Objectives: The purpose of our study was to determine the extent to which faculties from allopathy, homeopathy, and Ayurveda use RMS for their academic pursuits and to identify which methods are used most frequently. Methods: The survey was circulated among the faculties of three different disciplines of the health-care system to collect respondent demographic details and questionnaire responses. Data distribution and variable type were used to perform descriptive analysis. Results: The data from 114/150 respondents were analyzed. Of the 114 faculties who responded to our survey, 72 (63%) reported using RMS to publish their articles. Knowledge of how to use RMS software is common in allopathic faculties (40%), followed by homeopathy (14%) and Ayurveda (9%). Zotero (41%) is the most popular RMS software among users, followed by Mendeley (31%) and Endnote (12%). Conclusion: Despite being underreported, RMS software is frequently used for the needs of authors from various disciplines in the health-care system.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在对抗疗法、阿育吠陀和顺势疗法实践中使用参考管理软件
背景:参考文献管理软件(RMS)使研究人员能够组织和管理在研究论文发表期间通常识别的大量参考文献。目的和目的:我们研究的目的是确定对抗疗法、顺势疗法和阿育吠陀的院系在学术追求中使用RMS的程度,并确定哪种方法使用最频繁。方法:在卫生保健系统三个不同学科的院系中进行调查,收集调查对象的人口统计资料和问卷回答。采用数据分布和变量类型进行描述性分析。结果:对114/150名受访者的数据进行了分析。在114个回应我们调查的院系中,72个(63%)表示使用RMS发表他们的文章。了解如何使用RMS软件在对抗疗法院系中很常见(40%),其次是顺势疗法(14%)和阿育吠陀(9%)。Zotero(41%)是用户中最受欢迎的RMS软件,其次是Mendeley(31%)和Endnote(12%)。结论:尽管被低估,RMS软件经常用于满足卫生保健系统中不同学科作者的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Medical Specialities
Indian Journal of Medical Specialities MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
16.70%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: The Indian Journal of Medical Specialities is an all-encompassing peer-reviewed quarterly journal. The journal publishes scholarly articles, reviews, case reports and original research papers from medical specialities specially pertaining to clinical patterns and epidemiological profile of diseases. An important highlight is the emphasis on undergraduate and postgraduate medical education including various aspects of scientific paper-writing. The journal gives priority to research originating from the developing world, including from the tropical regions of the world. The journal also publishes special issues on health topics of current interest. The Indian Journal of Medical Specialities is one of the very few quality multispeciality scientific medical journals.
期刊最新文献
Polyserositis as an Initial Manifestation of Chronic Lymphocytic Lymphoma Loss-to-follow-up rate among tuberculosis patients registered at two tuberculosis units of ballabgarh block of district Faridabad, Haryana: A desk review Sudden and unexpected seizure during emergency cesarean section in a nonhypertensive hypothyroid primigravida Systemic inflammation response index and systemic immune inflammation index for predicting acute cholecystitis Study of serum zinc level in liver cirrhosis and its correlation with stages of hepatic encephalopathy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1