{"title":"Bilateral maxillary canine impaction with comparable migration track: Prevalence, sociodemographics and radiographic observations","authors":"B. Alyami, R. Braimah","doi":"10.4103/ijor.ijor_24_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Canines are perceived as cornerstones of the dental arch and plays an essential role in maintaining the facial coordination. When impacted, these functions are lost. We present the prevalence and radiographic presentation of distinctive bilateral maxillary canine. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective study of patients presenting for routine dental treatment between 2018 and 2020 at a dental center, Najran. A total of 2016 panoramic radiographs were screened and all patients with bilateral impacted canines were further screened radiologically using cone beam computed tomography. Data such demographics and presence of bilateral maxillary impacted canines were identified. Data analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for IOS Version 25 (Armonk, NY, USA: IBM Corp). Results: A total of 2016 panoramic radiographs were examined out of which 149 cases were the total impacted canines. Of these, 42 cases were bilateral impacted maxillary canines in comparable migration tract with a prevalence rate of 28.2%. There were 18 males and 24 females with an M: F of 1:1.3. Age ranged from 15 to 75 years with mean age ± standard deviation (27.9 ± 10.6) years. We observed the bilateral impacted canine positions were in relation to the central and lateral incisors in the anterio-posterior plane and the cervical and root portions of the roots of the central and lateral incisors in the inferior-superior plane. We attempted to group them into 3 main types (Types 1-3) with 3 subtypes (Subtypes a-c) each. Limitations: This a hospital based study and findings may not be generalized. Population based study is which is required to find out the prevalent rate in the community. Conclusion: These observed positions can be used to predict the favorability or otherwise of orthodontic traction of the impacted bilateral canines.","PeriodicalId":29888,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Orthodontic Rehabilitation","volume":"11 1","pages":"47 - 53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Orthodontic Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijor.ijor_24_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Introduction: Canines are perceived as cornerstones of the dental arch and plays an essential role in maintaining the facial coordination. When impacted, these functions are lost. We present the prevalence and radiographic presentation of distinctive bilateral maxillary canine. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective study of patients presenting for routine dental treatment between 2018 and 2020 at a dental center, Najran. A total of 2016 panoramic radiographs were screened and all patients with bilateral impacted canines were further screened radiologically using cone beam computed tomography. Data such demographics and presence of bilateral maxillary impacted canines were identified. Data analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for IOS Version 25 (Armonk, NY, USA: IBM Corp). Results: A total of 2016 panoramic radiographs were examined out of which 149 cases were the total impacted canines. Of these, 42 cases were bilateral impacted maxillary canines in comparable migration tract with a prevalence rate of 28.2%. There were 18 males and 24 females with an M: F of 1:1.3. Age ranged from 15 to 75 years with mean age ± standard deviation (27.9 ± 10.6) years. We observed the bilateral impacted canine positions were in relation to the central and lateral incisors in the anterio-posterior plane and the cervical and root portions of the roots of the central and lateral incisors in the inferior-superior plane. We attempted to group them into 3 main types (Types 1-3) with 3 subtypes (Subtypes a-c) each. Limitations: This a hospital based study and findings may not be generalized. Population based study is which is required to find out the prevalent rate in the community. Conclusion: These observed positions can be used to predict the favorability or otherwise of orthodontic traction of the impacted bilateral canines.
犬被认为是牙弓的基石,在维持面部协调方面起着至关重要的作用。当受到影响时,这些功能就会丢失。我们提出的患病率和独特的双侧上颌犬科影像学表现。材料和方法:这是一项回顾性研究,研究对象是2018年至2020年在Najran牙科中心接受常规牙科治疗的患者。共筛查了2016张全景x线片,并对所有双侧阻生犬进行了锥束计算机断层扫描。数据,如人口统计和存在双侧上颌阻生犬被确定。数据分析使用IBM SPSS Statistics for IOS Version 25(阿蒙克,纽约州,美国:IBM公司)。结果:共检查全景x线片2016张,其中全阻生犬149例。其中42例为双侧阻生上颌犬,发生率为28.2%。雄性18只,雌性24只,雌雄比为1:1.3。年龄15 ~ 75岁,平均年龄±标准差(27.9±10.6)岁。我们观察到双侧阻生犬的位置在前后平面与中切牙和侧切牙有关,在上下平面与中切牙和侧切牙根的颈部和根部有关。我们试图将它们分为3个主要类型(类型1-3)和3个亚型(亚型a-c)。局限性:这是一项基于医院的研究,研究结果可能不具有普遍性。以人口为基础的研究是需要找出患病率在社区。结论:这些观察到的位置可以用来预测对阻生双侧犬的正畸牵引是否有利。