Six Behaviors Policymakers Should Promote to Mitigate Climate Change

Q2 Social Sciences Behavioral Science and Policy Pub Date : 2021-10-01 DOI:10.1353/bsp.2021.0013
Kate Heller, Michael Berger, Antonius Gagern, Abdurakhim Rakhimov, John Thomas, Erik Thulin
{"title":"Six Behaviors Policymakers Should Promote to Mitigate Climate Change","authors":"Kate Heller, Michael Berger, Antonius Gagern, Abdurakhim Rakhimov, John Thomas, Erik Thulin","doi":"10.1353/bsp.2021.0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Policymakers have a crucial role to play in averting climate catastrophe. Policies that rely on behavioral science principles to encourage individuals to reduce emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases can be an effective complement to broader top-down policies, such as charging for carbon emissions—provided that the behavior-based policies focus on actions with the highest potential to reduce emissions. We conducted an analysis to identify behaviors that have the greatest practical potential to reduce emissions in the United States and modeled the effects of their uptake. Our analysis identified six behaviors to prioritize: If adopted by 5%–10% of the U.S. population, these actions can collectively lower current national emissions by 464 million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent per year, or 7% overall annually. We identify behavioral mechanisms that can inform policy design for promoting each of these behaviors.","PeriodicalId":36971,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Science and Policy","volume":"7 1","pages":"63 - 73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Science and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/bsp.2021.0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Policymakers have a crucial role to play in averting climate catastrophe. Policies that rely on behavioral science principles to encourage individuals to reduce emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases can be an effective complement to broader top-down policies, such as charging for carbon emissions—provided that the behavior-based policies focus on actions with the highest potential to reduce emissions. We conducted an analysis to identify behaviors that have the greatest practical potential to reduce emissions in the United States and modeled the effects of their uptake. Our analysis identified six behaviors to prioritize: If adopted by 5%–10% of the U.S. population, these actions can collectively lower current national emissions by 464 million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent per year, or 7% overall annually. We identify behavioral mechanisms that can inform policy design for promoting each of these behaviors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
政策制定者应该促进减缓气候变化的六种行为
政策制定者在避免气候灾难方面发挥着至关重要的作用。依靠行为科学原则鼓励个人减少二氧化碳和其他温室气体排放的政策可以有效地补充更广泛的自上而下的政策,例如对碳排放收费,前提是基于行为的政策侧重于最有可能减少排放的行动。我们进行了一项分析,以确定在美国具有最大实际减排潜力的行为,并对其吸收的影响进行了建模。我们的分析确定了六种需要优先考虑的行为:如果5%-10%的美国人口采取这些行动,这些行动可以共同降低目前全国每年4.64亿吨二氧化碳当量的排放量,即每年7%的总排放量。我们确定了可以为促进每一种行为的政策设计提供信息的行为机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Behavioral Science and Policy
Behavioral Science and Policy Social Sciences-Development
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hierarchy position & personality predict politicians’ choice of information sources Editor's note Election polls are 95% confident but only 60% accurate Penalties for Going Against Type: How Sexism Shapes Voters’ Perceptions of Candidate Character Leadership & overconfidence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1