Research on the normativity of aesthetic judgements in film criticism

IF 0.4 Q3 CULTURAL STUDIES Journal of Aesthetics & Culture Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20004214.2020.1729574
P. Zahrádka
{"title":"Research on the normativity of aesthetic judgements in film criticism","authors":"P. Zahrádka","doi":"10.1080/20004214.2020.1729574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Following methodological relativism, the paper reflects critically on objectivist theories of aesthetic judgement that derive its objectivity from the rules by which the judgement is made, or from ideal settings of the observer. Both theories share the assumption that the person delivering the reliable (objective) aesthetic judgement is an art critic. The critical reflection of both theories is based on pragmalinguistic analysis of film criticism, that is, on the reconstruction of the semantics and normativity of value judgements made by professional film critics.","PeriodicalId":43229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aesthetics & Culture","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20004214.2020.1729574","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aesthetics & Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20004214.2020.1729574","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

ABSTRACT Following methodological relativism, the paper reflects critically on objectivist theories of aesthetic judgement that derive its objectivity from the rules by which the judgement is made, or from ideal settings of the observer. Both theories share the assumption that the person delivering the reliable (objective) aesthetic judgement is an art critic. The critical reflection of both theories is based on pragmalinguistic analysis of film criticism, that is, on the reconstruction of the semantics and normativity of value judgements made by professional film critics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电影评论中审美判断的规范性研究
本文遵循方法论相对主义,批判性地反思客观主义的审美判断理论,这些理论的客观性来自于做出判断的规则,或者来自于观察者的理想环境。这两种理论都有一个共同的假设,即提供可靠(客观)审美判断的人是艺术评论家。这两种理论的批判反思都是基于对影评的语用语言学分析,即基于对专业影评人价值判断的语义学和规范性的重构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
33.30%
发文量
15
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
What AI “art” can teach us about art The standardized, mechanized, and annotated body. Fragmentation as cultural technique in recent video works by Kajsa Dahlberg, Kalle Brolin, and Hanni Kamaly The unbearable lightness of objects: Günter Figal’s spatial aesthetics The vertical axis and the agôn between theatre and philosophy “Whose roar is it, anyway? Localization and ideological communication with respect to the toho Godzilla franchise”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1