Institutional Inversion and “Demand-Side” Versus “Supply-Side” Views of Culture

IF 5.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Current Directions in Psychological Science Pub Date : 2023-03-02 DOI:10.1177/09637214221136087
D. Cohen, Min-Kyo Seo, Robert M. Lawless
{"title":"Institutional Inversion and “Demand-Side” Versus “Supply-Side” Views of Culture","authors":"D. Cohen, Min-Kyo Seo, Robert M. Lawless","doi":"10.1177/09637214221136087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Institutional inversion occurs when collective attitudes lead to institutions that in turn lead to behaviors that are the opposite of those attitudes. We illustrate this process with the case of debt, in which antidebtor attitudes in Protestant (vs. Catholic) cultures led to institutions that fostered higher household indebtedness. We describe three factors hypothesized to make institutional inversion more likely: erroneous lay theories (particularly those that take a “demand-side” vs. a “supply-side” view of culture), moralization, and narrow construals (in terms of time, goals, and populations considered).","PeriodicalId":10802,"journal":{"name":"Current Directions in Psychological Science","volume":"32 1","pages":"131 - 136"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Directions in Psychological Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214221136087","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Institutional inversion occurs when collective attitudes lead to institutions that in turn lead to behaviors that are the opposite of those attitudes. We illustrate this process with the case of debt, in which antidebtor attitudes in Protestant (vs. Catholic) cultures led to institutions that fostered higher household indebtedness. We describe three factors hypothesized to make institutional inversion more likely: erroneous lay theories (particularly those that take a “demand-side” vs. a “supply-side” view of culture), moralization, and narrow construals (in terms of time, goals, and populations considered).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
制度倒置与“需求侧”与“供给侧”文化观
当集体态度导致制度,而制度又导致与这些态度相反的行为时,就会发生制度倒置。我们以债务为例说明了这一过程,在债务中,新教(与天主教)文化中的反借款人态度导致了助长更高家庭债务的制度。我们描述了三个假设使制度倒置更有可能的因素:错误的世俗理论(特别是那些对文化持“需求侧”与“供给侧”观点的理论)、道德化和狭隘的解释(根据时间、目标和考虑的人群)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Directions in Psychological Science
Current Directions in Psychological Science PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
1.40%
发文量
61
期刊介绍: Current Directions in Psychological Science publishes reviews by leading experts covering all of scientific psychology and its applications. Each issue of Current Directions features a diverse mix of reports on various topics such as language, memory and cognition, development, the neural basis of behavior and emotions, various aspects of psychopathology, and theory of mind. These articles allow readers to stay apprised of important developments across subfields beyond their areas of expertise and bodies of research they might not otherwise be aware of. The articles in Current Directions are also written to be accessible to non-experts, making them ideally suited for use in the classroom as teaching supplements.
期刊最新文献
Generative Behaviors as Key Targets for Cognitive Models From a Baby’s Point of View: How Infants’ Face Diets Shape Their Face Perception Using Artificial Intelligence to Better Understand Human Intelligence Understanding, Predicting, and Preventing Suicide: Recent Advances Using Digital and Computational Methods Acknowledgment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1