De la critique de la dichotomie faits / valeurs à la redéfinition de la place des sciences dans la Nouvelle Rhétorique

Q4 Arts and Humanities Romanica Cracoviensia Pub Date : 2022-06-30 DOI:10.4467/20843917rc.22.006.15638
Françoise Collinet
{"title":"De la critique de la dichotomie faits / valeurs à la redéfinition de la place des sciences dans la Nouvelle Rhétorique","authors":"Françoise Collinet","doi":"10.4467/20843917rc.22.006.15638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From the Critique of the Dichotomy between Facts and Values to the Redefinition of the Place of Science in the New Rhetoric\n\nThe word “rhetoric”, which has crossed the centuries, can be found at the confluence of various disciplines (philosophy, linguistics, law, communication). It is much less spontaneously associated with the sciences. However, Perelman suggests a kinship between his concerns and the work of certain epistemologists (e.g. Polanyi, Kuhn, Gonseth). Above all, we would like to show how, through a rather formal mechanism and a wise limitation of its programme, the New Rhetoric manages, in our opinion, to escape the pitfall of absolute relativism.","PeriodicalId":53485,"journal":{"name":"Romanica Cracoviensia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Romanica Cracoviensia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4467/20843917rc.22.006.15638","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

From the Critique of the Dichotomy between Facts and Values to the Redefinition of the Place of Science in the New Rhetoric The word “rhetoric”, which has crossed the centuries, can be found at the confluence of various disciplines (philosophy, linguistics, law, communication). It is much less spontaneously associated with the sciences. However, Perelman suggests a kinship between his concerns and the work of certain epistemologists (e.g. Polanyi, Kuhn, Gonseth). Above all, we would like to show how, through a rather formal mechanism and a wise limitation of its programme, the New Rhetoric manages, in our opinion, to escape the pitfall of absolute relativism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从对事实/价值二分法的批判到重新定义科学在新修辞学中的地位
从对事实与价值二分法的批判到对科学在新修辞学中的地位的重新界定“修辞学”一词,跨越了几个世纪,在哲学、语言学、法学、传播学等各个学科的交汇处都可以找到。它很少自然而然地与科学联系在一起。然而,佩雷尔曼认为,他的关注与某些认识论家(如波兰尼、库恩、冈塞斯)的工作之间存在着亲缘关系。最重要的是,我们想表明,在我们看来,《新修辞学》是如何通过一种相当正式的机制和对其纲领的明智限制,设法摆脱绝对相对主义的陷阱的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Romanica Cracoviensia
Romanica Cracoviensia Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Romanica Cracoviensia to czasopismo naukowe poświęcone kulturom - literaturom i językom - romańskim, czyli francuskim, hiszpańskim, katalońskim, portugalskim, galicyjskim, włoskim, rumuńskim i wielu mniejszym romańskim obszarom językowym.
期刊最新文献
Du latin tardif au numérique. Une histoire de la phrase française des « Serments de Strasbourg » aux écritures numériques sous la direction de Gilles Siouffi La visée pathémique dans le genre de la critique de cinéma comme stratégie persuasive Prédications juridiques avec les termes maternité, paternité et leurs équivalents polonais Análisis contrastivo de pronombres personales de los debates electorales Zapatero-Rajoy y Tusk-Kaczyński Les dramaturgies de l’existence, ou le tragique quotidien au théâtre : Karolina Czerska, Tadeusz Kantor i Maurice Maeterlinck. Dramaturgie istnienia [Tadeusz Kantor et Maurice Maeterlinck. Dramaturgies de l’existence]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1