COVID-19 infections in staff of an emergency care hospital after the first wave of the pandemic in Germany

IF 1.7 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH GMS Hygiene and Infection Control Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.3205/dgkh000407
Philipp Stüven, Georg Mühlenbruch, Agnes Evenschor-Ascheid, Ellen Conzen, C. Peters, A. Schablon, A. Nienhaus
{"title":"COVID-19 infections in staff of an emergency care hospital after the first wave of the pandemic in Germany","authors":"Philipp Stüven, Georg Mühlenbruch, Agnes Evenschor-Ascheid, Ellen Conzen, C. Peters, A. Schablon, A. Nienhaus","doi":"10.3205/dgkh000407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Hospital staff have an increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection. It is thus necessary to monitor the situation because infected staff may in turn infect patients and their family members. Following the first wave of infection in the summer of 2020, the Rhine-Maas Hospital (RMK) provided all staff the opportunity to be tested for SARS-COV-2 via antibody testing. Methods: The tests were carried out from 19.6.2020 to 17.7.2020. The IgG antibody test qualitatively tested for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). An IgG titre of 0.8 IU/mL or more was considered positive. All staff who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by PCR testing after February 2020 were also included in the study. Occupational and non-occupational risk factors for infection were determined. Staff in the intensive care ward, the emergency depart-ment, or a SARS-CoV-2 ward (“corona ward”) were predefined as having increased exposure. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated using logistical regression for occupational and private infection risk. Results: 903 staff members (58.9%) with complete data took part in the cross-sectional study. 52 staff members (5.8%) had a positive PCR test result in their medical history or tested positive in the IgG test. Around half of the infections (55%) were only detected by serological testing during the study. Staff with tasks classified as at-risk had an OR of 1.9 (95% CI 1.04–3.5) for infection. Risk factors also included private contacts to people infected with SARS-CoV-2 and holidays in risk areas. At the time of data collection, 11.5% of those with the disease reported that they had not yet fully recovered from COVID-19. Discussion: Following the first COVID-19 wave, 5.3% of staff at the RMK were infected. An increase in occupational infection risk was found even after controlling for non-occupational infection risks. This should be taken into account with regard to the recognition of COVID-19 as an occupational disease. Methods to improve protection against nosocomial transmissions should be considered.","PeriodicalId":12738,"journal":{"name":"GMS Hygiene and Infection Control","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GMS Hygiene and Infection Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3205/dgkh000407","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background: Hospital staff have an increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection. It is thus necessary to monitor the situation because infected staff may in turn infect patients and their family members. Following the first wave of infection in the summer of 2020, the Rhine-Maas Hospital (RMK) provided all staff the opportunity to be tested for SARS-COV-2 via antibody testing. Methods: The tests were carried out from 19.6.2020 to 17.7.2020. The IgG antibody test qualitatively tested for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). An IgG titre of 0.8 IU/mL or more was considered positive. All staff who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by PCR testing after February 2020 were also included in the study. Occupational and non-occupational risk factors for infection were determined. Staff in the intensive care ward, the emergency depart-ment, or a SARS-CoV-2 ward (“corona ward”) were predefined as having increased exposure. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated using logistical regression for occupational and private infection risk. Results: 903 staff members (58.9%) with complete data took part in the cross-sectional study. 52 staff members (5.8%) had a positive PCR test result in their medical history or tested positive in the IgG test. Around half of the infections (55%) were only detected by serological testing during the study. Staff with tasks classified as at-risk had an OR of 1.9 (95% CI 1.04–3.5) for infection. Risk factors also included private contacts to people infected with SARS-CoV-2 and holidays in risk areas. At the time of data collection, 11.5% of those with the disease reported that they had not yet fully recovered from COVID-19. Discussion: Following the first COVID-19 wave, 5.3% of staff at the RMK were infected. An increase in occupational infection risk was found even after controlling for non-occupational infection risks. This should be taken into account with regard to the recognition of COVID-19 as an occupational disease. Methods to improve protection against nosocomial transmissions should be considered.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
德国第一波疫情后,一家急救医院工作人员感染新冠肺炎
背景:医院工作人员感染严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型的风险增加。因此,有必要监测情况,因为受感染的工作人员可能反过来感染患者及其家人。在2020年夏天出现第一波感染后,莱茵马斯医院(RMK)为所有员工提供了通过抗体检测进行严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型检测的机会。方法:实验时间为20年6月19日至20年7月17日。IgG抗体测试通过酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)对严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型抗体进行定性测试。IgG滴度为0.8 IU/mL或以上被认为是阳性的。2020年2月后,所有通过PCR检测呈严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型阳性的员工也被纳入该研究。确定了感染的职业和非职业危险因素。重症监护病房、急诊室或严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型病房(“电晕病房”)的工作人员被预先定义为暴露量增加。使用职业和私人感染风险的逻辑回归计算比值比(OR)。结果:903名数据完整的工作人员(58.9%)参加了横断面研究。52名工作人员(5.8%)的病史中PCR检测结果呈阳性或IgG检测呈阳性。大约一半的感染(55%)是在研究期间仅通过血清学检测发现的。从事高危任务的员工感染的OR为1.9(95%CI 1.04-3.5)。风险因素还包括与严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型感染者的私人接触以及在风险地区度假。在数据收集时,11.5%的患者报告称,他们尚未从新冠肺炎中完全康复。讨论:在第一波新冠肺炎疫情之后,RMK 5.3%的员工被感染。即使在控制了非职业感染风险后,也发现职业感染风险增加。在承认新冠肺炎为职业病时应考虑到这一点。应考虑采取措施加强对医院传播的防护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
GMS Hygiene and Infection Control
GMS Hygiene and Infection Control PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Equivalent reduction of Escherichia coli by rinsing hands with cold and warm water. Etiologic assessment of palatal petechiae - a case report. Investigation of the efficiency of different reprocessing methods on disposable laryngeal masks contaminated with HBV DNA. Monkeypox: Oral manifestation as diagnostic indicator. Online survey on barriers and drivers to flu vaccination among staff at a German university hospital during the Covid-19 pandemic 2022 (flu-vaccination motive study).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1