Relationships among water, food, energy, and ecosystems in the Mid-Latitude Region in the context of sustainable development goals

IF 4.3 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Reviews Pub Date : 2022-09-26 DOI:10.1139/er-2022-0041
S. Wang, Whijin Kim, Cholho Song, E. Park, H. Jo, Jiwon Kim, Wookyun Lee
{"title":"Relationships among water, food, energy, and ecosystems in the Mid-Latitude Region in the context of sustainable development goals","authors":"S. Wang, Whijin Kim, Cholho Song, E. Park, H. Jo, Jiwon Kim, Wookyun Lee","doi":"10.1139/er-2022-0041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The progress of the global effort to achieve Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) is increasingly impeded by the degradation of critical and fundamental resources such as water, food, energy, and ecosystem services. The Mid Latitude Region (MLR) of the world is at the forefront of confronting these challenges due to rapid population growth, increasing poverty, and drought and climate change that are exacerbating the transition of semi-arid landscapes to deserts. While scientific studies are accumulating around the water-food-energy-ecosystem nexus, efforts to simulate how the linkages amongst the elements relate to SDGs are lacking in the MLR. We attempt to review and analyze existing literature about how water-food-energy-ecosystems operate, interact, and relate to SDGs. We identified 37 relationships and ascertained the nature of their interactions, of which 12 are significant and have direct bearings on the SDGs. The findings show that most studies and approaches that address the nexus challenges in the MLR exist in silos. In addition, there is a lack of a scientific approach to quantify how the nexus operates and relates to SDGs. For instance, past studies show that deforestation for agriculture could increase food security. However, there is a weak focus on tradeoffs (e.g., loss of ecosystem services due to deforestation). Deforestation is also shown to have a negative relationship with the quantity and quality of water (SDG6) as well as the functionality of an ecosystem (SDG15). Furthermore, the review has indicated a negative relationship between irrigated agriculture and water and a positive relationship with food. This directly implies that water and food issues must be addressed in tandem and not separately if we are to achieve SDG goals 2 and 6. The review supports the idea that water, food, energy, and ecosystem services cannot be managed separately, and that future approaches must focus on integrating and optimizing the connections between them to ensure sustainable development.","PeriodicalId":50514,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2022-0041","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The progress of the global effort to achieve Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) is increasingly impeded by the degradation of critical and fundamental resources such as water, food, energy, and ecosystem services. The Mid Latitude Region (MLR) of the world is at the forefront of confronting these challenges due to rapid population growth, increasing poverty, and drought and climate change that are exacerbating the transition of semi-arid landscapes to deserts. While scientific studies are accumulating around the water-food-energy-ecosystem nexus, efforts to simulate how the linkages amongst the elements relate to SDGs are lacking in the MLR. We attempt to review and analyze existing literature about how water-food-energy-ecosystems operate, interact, and relate to SDGs. We identified 37 relationships and ascertained the nature of their interactions, of which 12 are significant and have direct bearings on the SDGs. The findings show that most studies and approaches that address the nexus challenges in the MLR exist in silos. In addition, there is a lack of a scientific approach to quantify how the nexus operates and relates to SDGs. For instance, past studies show that deforestation for agriculture could increase food security. However, there is a weak focus on tradeoffs (e.g., loss of ecosystem services due to deforestation). Deforestation is also shown to have a negative relationship with the quantity and quality of water (SDG6) as well as the functionality of an ecosystem (SDG15). Furthermore, the review has indicated a negative relationship between irrigated agriculture and water and a positive relationship with food. This directly implies that water and food issues must be addressed in tandem and not separately if we are to achieve SDG goals 2 and 6. The review supports the idea that water, food, energy, and ecosystem services cannot be managed separately, and that future approaches must focus on integrating and optimizing the connections between them to ensure sustainable development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可持续发展目标背景下的中纬度地区水、粮食、能源和生态系统之间的关系
水、粮食、能源和生态系统服务等关键和基本资源的退化越来越阻碍全球实现可持续发展目标的努力。由于人口快速增长、贫困加剧、干旱和气候变化加剧了半干旱地区向沙漠的过渡,世界中纬度地区处于应对这些挑战的前沿。虽然围绕水-食物-能源-生态系统关系的科学研究正在积累,但MLR中缺乏模拟这些要素之间的联系与可持续发展目标之间关系的努力。我们试图回顾和分析关于水-食物-能源生态系统如何运作、相互作用以及与可持续发展目标之间关系的现有文献。我们确定了37种关系,并确定了它们相互作用的性质,其中12种关系重要,与可持续发展目标有直接关系。研究结果表明,解决MLR中的关联挑战的大多数研究和方法都是孤立的。此外,缺乏一种科学的方法来量化这种联系是如何运作的以及与可持续发展目标的关系。例如,过去的研究表明,为农业而砍伐森林可以提高粮食安全。然而,对权衡(例如,森林砍伐造成的生态系统服务损失)的关注不足。森林砍伐也与水的数量和质量(SDG6)以及生态系统的功能(SDG15)呈负相关。此外,审查表明,灌溉农业与水之间存在负面关系,与粮食之间存在正面关系。这直接意味着,如果我们要实现可持续发展目标2和6,水和粮食问题必须同时解决,而不是单独解决。该审查支持这样一种观点,即水、粮食、能源和生态系统服务不能单独管理,未来的方法必须侧重于整合和优化它们之间的联系,以确保可持续发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Reviews
Environmental Reviews 环境科学-环境科学
自引率
3.50%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: Published since 1993, Environmental Reviews is a quarterly journal that presents authoritative literature reviews on a wide range of environmental science and associated environmental studies topics, with emphasis on the effects on and response of both natural and manmade ecosystems to anthropogenic stress. The authorship and scope are international, with critical literature reviews submitted and invited on such topics as sustainability, water supply management, climate change, harvesting impacts, acid rain, pesticide use, lake acidification, air and marine pollution, oil and gas development, biological control, food chain biomagnification, rehabilitation of polluted aquatic systems, erosion, forestry, bio-indicators of environmental stress, conservation of biodiversity, and many other environmental issues.
期刊最新文献
A review of the assessment techniques used for population monitoring at different life stages of sturgeons Review of climate change and drinking water supply systems: employee perspectives and potential tools for adaptation The Acadian Forest of New Brunswick in the 21st century: what shifting heat and water balance implies for future stand dynamics and management Managing exploitation of freshwater species and aggregates to protect and restore freshwater biodiversity Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis in Assessing Watershed Scale Pollution Risk: A Review of Combined Approaches and Applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1