The Decentralization of American Art Diplomacy in the Early and Mid-20th Century

IF 0.5 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF ARTS MANAGEMENT LAW AND SOCIETY Pub Date : 2020-11-01 DOI:10.1080/10632921.2020.1845891
Hyojung Cho
{"title":"The Decentralization of American Art Diplomacy in the Early and Mid-20th Century","authors":"Hyojung Cho","doi":"10.1080/10632921.2020.1845891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract During the Cold War period, the scope of the “culture” presented in public diplomacy was vastly broad, and not all genres of arts, culture, and education were valued with the same weight. For each area, the political environments were different, and the policy tools were differentiated, which demands reviewing them in cultural diplomacy separately. Visual art was a small yet controversial area of US cultural diplomacy in the early and mid-20th century, but art diplomacy during the Cold War is still commonly misunderstood as having been a centralized effort with substantial government funding. It impedes precise insight into the governmental and nongovernmental efforts in not only art diplomacy, but also general US cultural diplomacy. This research studies the decentralization of art diplomacy in the early and mid-20th century and examines the political environment toward art diplomacy and the policy tools, such as the third-party government in overcoming challenges. It investigates the political dynamics and characteristics of art diplomacy during the period and acknowledges the contribution and growth of nongovernmental actors in the field.","PeriodicalId":45760,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF ARTS MANAGEMENT LAW AND SOCIETY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10632921.2020.1845891","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF ARTS MANAGEMENT LAW AND SOCIETY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10632921.2020.1845891","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract During the Cold War period, the scope of the “culture” presented in public diplomacy was vastly broad, and not all genres of arts, culture, and education were valued with the same weight. For each area, the political environments were different, and the policy tools were differentiated, which demands reviewing them in cultural diplomacy separately. Visual art was a small yet controversial area of US cultural diplomacy in the early and mid-20th century, but art diplomacy during the Cold War is still commonly misunderstood as having been a centralized effort with substantial government funding. It impedes precise insight into the governmental and nongovernmental efforts in not only art diplomacy, but also general US cultural diplomacy. This research studies the decentralization of art diplomacy in the early and mid-20th century and examines the political environment toward art diplomacy and the policy tools, such as the third-party government in overcoming challenges. It investigates the political dynamics and characteristics of art diplomacy during the period and acknowledges the contribution and growth of nongovernmental actors in the field.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
20世纪早期和中期美国艺术外交的去中心化
在冷战时期,公共外交中所呈现的“文化”的范围非常广泛,并不是所有类型的艺术、文化和教育都受到同样的重视。每个地区的政治环境不同,政策工具也不同,需要在文化外交中分别进行考察。在20世纪早期和中期,视觉艺术是美国文化外交的一个小而有争议的领域,但冷战期间的艺术外交仍然普遍被误解为是由大量政府资助的集中努力。它不仅阻碍了对政府和非政府组织在艺术外交方面的努力的准确洞察,也阻碍了对美国整体文化外交的准确洞察。本研究以20世纪上半叶艺术外交的去中心化为研究对象,考察了艺术外交的政治环境和第三方政府等应对挑战的政策工具。它调查了这一时期艺术外交的政治动态和特征,并承认非政府行动者在这一领域的贡献和发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JOURNAL OF ARTS MANAGEMENT LAW AND SOCIETY
JOURNAL OF ARTS MANAGEMENT LAW AND SOCIETY HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: How will technology change the arts world? Who owns what in the information age? How will museums survive in the future? The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society has supplied answers to these kinds of questions for more than twenty-five years, becoming the authoritative resource for arts policymakers and analysts, sociologists, arts and cultural administrators, educators, trustees, artists, lawyers, and citizens concerned with the performing, visual, and media arts, as well as cultural affairs. Articles, commentaries, and reviews of publications address marketing, intellectual property, arts policy, arts law, governance, and cultural production and dissemination, always from a variety of philosophical, disciplinary, and national and international perspectives.
期刊最新文献
The Land of (Almost) No Central Government Arts Spending? Cultural Policy, Protestant Denominations, and the Cultural Policy Singularity of Unites States of America The Beginner’s Guide to Opera Stage Management: Gathering the Tools You Need to Work in Opera Arts and Culture Nonprofits as Civic Actors: Mapping Audience, Community, and Civic Engagement in Nonprofit Organizations Managing Arts Organizations The Advocacy Coalition in the British Film Institute in Its Early Days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1