Lucy Hutchinson’s and Margaret Cavendish’s Petitionary Lives

IF 0.6 2区 文学 0 LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES ENGLISH LITERARY RENAISSANCE Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1086/726098
Laura De Furio
{"title":"Lucy Hutchinson’s and Margaret Cavendish’s Petitionary Lives","authors":"Laura De Furio","doi":"10.1086/726098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Margaret Cavendish and Lucy Hutchinson used similar generic strategies, borrowed from the mid-century petition, when composing biographies of their husbands, The Life of William Cavendish and Memoirs of the Life of Colonel Hutchinson. While both authors use their prefaces to frame their biographies as dispassionate recitations of historical fact, rather than defending a purely documentary regime, such pronouncements obliquely prompt readers to search for deviations from the authors’ biographic agendas. This essay will argue that Cavendish and Hutchinson used the biographies of their husbands to disguise and promote political critiques that ultimately reveal the autocratic impulses of Charles II in the early years of the Restoration. Such critiques, I propose, are grounded in the complementary self-presentations of the authors. Informed by their common experience as petitioners of unfriendly bureaucracies, Cavendish and Hutchinson style themselves as advocates for constitutional monarchy and particularly the preservation of rights and privileges due to English citizens. Finally, by examining the intersection of biography and autobiography, petition and legal testimony, this essay challenges the scholarly tendency to assign highly gendered critical frameworks to Memoirs and Life of William, which are more likely to be described as wifely romances than as political treatises. [L.D.F.]","PeriodicalId":44199,"journal":{"name":"ENGLISH LITERARY RENAISSANCE","volume":"53 1","pages":"327 - 350"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ENGLISH LITERARY RENAISSANCE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/726098","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Margaret Cavendish and Lucy Hutchinson used similar generic strategies, borrowed from the mid-century petition, when composing biographies of their husbands, The Life of William Cavendish and Memoirs of the Life of Colonel Hutchinson. While both authors use their prefaces to frame their biographies as dispassionate recitations of historical fact, rather than defending a purely documentary regime, such pronouncements obliquely prompt readers to search for deviations from the authors’ biographic agendas. This essay will argue that Cavendish and Hutchinson used the biographies of their husbands to disguise and promote political critiques that ultimately reveal the autocratic impulses of Charles II in the early years of the Restoration. Such critiques, I propose, are grounded in the complementary self-presentations of the authors. Informed by their common experience as petitioners of unfriendly bureaucracies, Cavendish and Hutchinson style themselves as advocates for constitutional monarchy and particularly the preservation of rights and privileges due to English citizens. Finally, by examining the intersection of biography and autobiography, petition and legal testimony, this essay challenges the scholarly tendency to assign highly gendered critical frameworks to Memoirs and Life of William, which are more likely to be described as wifely romances than as political treatises. [L.D.F.]
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
露西·哈钦森和玛格丽特·卡文迪什的请愿生活
玛格丽特·卡文迪什和露西·哈钦森在为她们的丈夫撰写传记《威廉·卡文迪什的一生》和《哈钦森上校的一生回忆录》时,采用了类似的通用策略,借鉴了本世纪中叶的请愿书。虽然两位作者都在前言中将自己的传记描述为对历史事实的冷静复述,而不是为纯粹的纪实体系辩护,但这样的声明间接地促使读者寻找与作者传记议程的偏差。本文将论证卡文迪什和哈钦森利用他们丈夫的传记来掩饰和促进政治批评,最终揭示了查理二世在复辟初期的专制冲动。我认为,这样的批评是建立在作者的互补自我表现的基础上的。卡文迪什和哈钦森都曾向不友好的官僚机构请愿,由于他们的共同经历,卡文迪什和哈钦森把自己塑造成君主立宪制的倡导者,尤其是维护英国公民的权利和特权。最后,通过研究传记和自传、请愿书和法律证词的交集,这篇文章挑战了将高度性别化的批评框架分配给《回忆录》和《威廉的一生》的学术倾向,这两本书更有可能被描述为妻子的浪漫故事,而不是政治论文。(L.D.F.)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: English Literary Renaissance is a journal devoted to current criticism and scholarship of Tudor and early Stuart English literature, 1485-1665, including Shakespeare, Spenser, Donne, and Milton. It is unique in featuring the publication of rare texts and newly discovered manuscripts of the period and current annotated bibliographies of work in the field. It is illustrated with contemporary woodcuts and engravings of Renaissance England and Europe.
期刊最新文献
Sidney’s Penetrations: Metaphors and Ideas Margaret Russell, Countess of Cumberland’s Letter to John Layfield: Composing Grief through Consolation and Lamentation A Proof of Pleasure: Renaissance in Rancière, Auerbach, Marlowe Lucy Hutchinson’s Everyday War: The 1640s Manuscript and her Restoration ‘Elegies’ “Noe dish whose tast, or dressing, is unknown / Unto oʳ natives”: Local and Global Material Cultures in the Food Rituals of Thomas Salusbury’s 1634 “Chirk Castle Entertainment”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1