A differentiated courtship: A regime-type analysis of Russia’s Southern African (arms) trade, 2012–2019

IF 0.8 Q3 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS South African Journal of International Affairs-SAJIA Pub Date : 2022-10-02 DOI:10.1080/10220461.2022.2144942
Bhaso Ndzendze, Zimkhitha Manyana
{"title":"A differentiated courtship: A regime-type analysis of Russia’s Southern African (arms) trade, 2012–2019","authors":"Bhaso Ndzendze, Zimkhitha Manyana","doi":"10.1080/10220461.2022.2144942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article presents on general Russian exports to the 16 states in the Southern Africa Development Community, considered by regime type, as well as trade in arms with these states, to determine whether Russia’s commercial ties have been proportionally greater with authoritarian, democratic, or hybrid regimes. The findings indicate a potential ‘differentiated courtship’ between Russia and Southern Africa’s different regime types. Respectively, Russia’s overall trade was concentrated among democracies ahead of authoritarian regimes and hybrid regimes, in line with each regime type’s proportion of regional GDP. On the other hand, Russian arms exports followed a different pattern, in that authoritarian regimes purchased arms at a magnitude slightly beyond that regime type’s proportion of the Southern African regional GDP. The research also found that 60% of all hybrid regimes purchased Russian arms, evincing the highest frequency of importing Russian arms (albeit at small dollar amounts) among all three regime types.","PeriodicalId":44641,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of International Affairs-SAJIA","volume":"29 1","pages":"483 - 507"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of International Affairs-SAJIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10220461.2022.2144942","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article presents on general Russian exports to the 16 states in the Southern Africa Development Community, considered by regime type, as well as trade in arms with these states, to determine whether Russia’s commercial ties have been proportionally greater with authoritarian, democratic, or hybrid regimes. The findings indicate a potential ‘differentiated courtship’ between Russia and Southern Africa’s different regime types. Respectively, Russia’s overall trade was concentrated among democracies ahead of authoritarian regimes and hybrid regimes, in line with each regime type’s proportion of regional GDP. On the other hand, Russian arms exports followed a different pattern, in that authoritarian regimes purchased arms at a magnitude slightly beyond that regime type’s proportion of the Southern African regional GDP. The research also found that 60% of all hybrid regimes purchased Russian arms, evincing the highest frequency of importing Russian arms (albeit at small dollar amounts) among all three regime types.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
差异化的求爱:对俄罗斯南部非洲(武器)贸易的政权类型分析,2012-2019
摘要本文介绍了俄罗斯对南部非洲发展共同体16个国家的一般出口,按政权类型考虑,以及与这些国家的武器贸易,以确定俄罗斯与威权、民主或混合政权的商业关系是否在比例上更大。研究结果表明,俄罗斯和南部非洲不同政权类型之间存在潜在的“差异化求爱”。俄罗斯的整体贸易分别集中在民主国家之间,领先于威权政权和混合政权,与每种政权类型在地区GDP中的比例一致。另一方面,俄罗斯的武器出口遵循了一种不同的模式,即独裁政权购买的武器数量略高于该政权类型在南部非洲地区GDP中的比例。研究还发现,60%的混合政权购买了俄罗斯武器,这表明在所有三种政权中,进口俄罗斯武器的频率最高(尽管金额较小)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
18.20%
发文量
36
期刊最新文献
Inclusive elections? The case of persons with disabilities in the European Union Are polarised elections the hardest to deliver? Explaining global variations in electoral management body performance Mitigating the impact of democratic recession through electoral assistance in Africa Global trends and impact of democratic recession: Hard choices for the Global South African election management bodies in the era of democratic backsliding
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1