Localization at Users' Sites is Not Enough: GhanaPostGPS and Power Reticulations in the Postcolony

IF 1.5 4区 文学 Q2 COMMUNICATION Technical Communication Pub Date : 2022-05-01 DOI:10.55177/tc041879
G. E. Agbozo
{"title":"Localization at Users' Sites is Not Enough: GhanaPostGPS and Power Reticulations in the Postcolony","authors":"G. E. Agbozo","doi":"10.55177/tc041879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This study re-examines contemporary localization theory to understand the shortcomings of the theory using the case of a state-sponsored postcolonial technology localization project. I call for centering the analysis of the power reticulations in context-specific technology\n localization. Method: I engaged in extensive review of existing research on the subject and conducted ethnographic and digital surveys with users and non-users of the technology I studied. This method provided nuanced perspectives on technology localization for a grounded\n user experience analysis. Results: Against current theoretical assumptions that support localization in user contexts as the solution to the chasm between developer culture and user culture, I argue that the reticular nature of power and developers' neglect of users' geo-epistemology\n also create a chasm within localization at users' sites. Conclusion: We need to examine the complex work of power in user contexts as part of a holistic theory on technology localization in user contexts. Thus, current assumptions must be revised. This revision must insist\n on the primary role of users' worldings in localization. The context of the postcolony provides a privileged insight into theorizing technology localization and must not be seen only as a \"kingdom of ethnography\" (Mbembe, 2021, p. 14).","PeriodicalId":46338,"journal":{"name":"Technical Communication","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technical Communication","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55177/tc041879","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose: This study re-examines contemporary localization theory to understand the shortcomings of the theory using the case of a state-sponsored postcolonial technology localization project. I call for centering the analysis of the power reticulations in context-specific technology localization. Method: I engaged in extensive review of existing research on the subject and conducted ethnographic and digital surveys with users and non-users of the technology I studied. This method provided nuanced perspectives on technology localization for a grounded user experience analysis. Results: Against current theoretical assumptions that support localization in user contexts as the solution to the chasm between developer culture and user culture, I argue that the reticular nature of power and developers' neglect of users' geo-epistemology also create a chasm within localization at users' sites. Conclusion: We need to examine the complex work of power in user contexts as part of a holistic theory on technology localization in user contexts. Thus, current assumptions must be revised. This revision must insist on the primary role of users' worldings in localization. The context of the postcolony provides a privileged insight into theorizing technology localization and must not be seen only as a "kingdom of ethnography" (Mbembe, 2021, p. 14).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用户网站的本地化是不够的:后殖民时代的GhanaPostGPS和权力退役
目的:本研究以国家资助的后殖民技术本地化项目为例,重新审视当代本地化理论,以了解该理论的不足。我呼吁在具体技术本地化的背景下集中分析电网。方法:我对该主题的现有研究进行了广泛的回顾,并对我研究的技术的用户和非用户进行了民族志和数字调查。这种方法为基础用户体验分析提供了技术本地化的细微视角。结果:针对目前支持在用户环境中本地化以解决开发者文化和用户文化之间鸿沟的理论假设,我认为权力的网状性质和开发者对用户地理认识论的忽视也在用户网站的本地化中造成了鸿沟。结论:我们需要研究用户环境中权力的复杂作用,作为用户环境中技术本地化的整体理论的一部分。因此,必须修订目前的假设。本次修订必须坚持用户世界在本地化中的主要作用。后殖民主义的背景为技术本地化的理论化提供了一种特殊的见解,不能仅仅被视为“民族志王国”(Mbembe,2021,第14页)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Technical Communication
Technical Communication COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
20.00%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
From the Poor to the Rich: Predatory Inclusion and the Robinhood App Review of Research: Critical Interface Analysis as a Heuristic for Justice-Focused, Community-Engaged Design Research Making Solutions Visible: Facilitating Housing Equality through Interface Design Driving Innovation: Analyzing Mobile Ridesharing App Interfaces and Moving Toward Community-Based User Experience (CBX) Reporting Online Aggression: A Transnational Comparative Interface Analysis of Sina Weibo and Twitter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1