Assessment of the impact of the costs of building the floor profile on the technological flexibility of four-row buildings for free-box breeding of cows

V. Dimova
{"title":"Assessment of the impact of the costs of building the floor profile on the technological\nflexibility of four-row buildings for free-box breeding of cows","authors":"V. Dimova","doi":"10.15547/ast.2022.02.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. A total of 20 popular technical and technological schemes of semi-open four-row buildings for dairy cows with widths in the range 20.60-31.00 m have been analyzed. The options have been grouped according to the internal distribution of the buildings. Their technological flexibility has been determined and a preferred range of widths with a maximum has been outlined. For the individual studied options the costs for the technological profile of the floor (including the stationary equipment) have been calculated, as well as costs for the construction of the zero cycle, the bearing and enclosing constructions of the building have been excluded. For each preferred width, the material consumption of the floor profile has been assessed according to the construction indicators: consumption of concrete and steel (reinforcement - for reinforced concrete pavement and profile - for technological equipment), related to 1 m2 of built-up area and one slaughterhouse. A methodology for qualitative assessment of technological flexibility has been developed taking into account the impact of these costs. It has been established that the buildings with widths in the range of 25.20-25.40 m have the greatest technological flexibility. Buildings with widths in the ranges of 23.20-25.20 m and 25.80-28.00 m with equal flexibility also have very good indicators. According to the developed methodology, the widths with the same technological flexibility differ in the assessment of the impact of the costs for the floor profile - to greater extent for larger width ranges. The buildings with widths of 25.20 m and 25.40 m with maximum technological flexibility are practically equivalent, and the differences in estimates taking into account the impact of total costs of concrete and steel per 1 m2 built-up area of the floor at widths 23.20 m, 25.80 m and 28.00 m are 2.1-4.0%. For the same widths, the estimates, taking into account the impact of the total cost of concrete and steel for one cattle ranch, are from 6.5 to 15.9%. The developed methodology is recommended for the practice for assessing the impact of the costs of the floor profile on the technological flexibility of buildings with a large capacity for free-box breeding of cows. Of the four-row buildings, those with widths in the range of 25.20-25.40 m and width 23.20 m are recommended.","PeriodicalId":55762,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Science and Technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15547/ast.2022.02.023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. A total of 20 popular technical and technological schemes of semi-open four-row buildings for dairy cows with widths in the range 20.60-31.00 m have been analyzed. The options have been grouped according to the internal distribution of the buildings. Their technological flexibility has been determined and a preferred range of widths with a maximum has been outlined. For the individual studied options the costs for the technological profile of the floor (including the stationary equipment) have been calculated, as well as costs for the construction of the zero cycle, the bearing and enclosing constructions of the building have been excluded. For each preferred width, the material consumption of the floor profile has been assessed according to the construction indicators: consumption of concrete and steel (reinforcement - for reinforced concrete pavement and profile - for technological equipment), related to 1 m2 of built-up area and one slaughterhouse. A methodology for qualitative assessment of technological flexibility has been developed taking into account the impact of these costs. It has been established that the buildings with widths in the range of 25.20-25.40 m have the greatest technological flexibility. Buildings with widths in the ranges of 23.20-25.20 m and 25.80-28.00 m with equal flexibility also have very good indicators. According to the developed methodology, the widths with the same technological flexibility differ in the assessment of the impact of the costs for the floor profile - to greater extent for larger width ranges. The buildings with widths of 25.20 m and 25.40 m with maximum technological flexibility are practically equivalent, and the differences in estimates taking into account the impact of total costs of concrete and steel per 1 m2 built-up area of the floor at widths 23.20 m, 25.80 m and 28.00 m are 2.1-4.0%. For the same widths, the estimates, taking into account the impact of the total cost of concrete and steel for one cattle ranch, are from 6.5 to 15.9%. The developed methodology is recommended for the practice for assessing the impact of the costs of the floor profile on the technological flexibility of buildings with a large capacity for free-box breeding of cows. Of the four-row buildings, those with widths in the range of 25.20-25.40 m and width 23.20 m are recommended.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估建造地板轮廓的成本对奶牛自由箱养四排建筑的技术灵活性的影响
摘要对20个宽度在20.60-31.00m之间的奶牛半开放式四排棚的流行技术和工艺方案进行了分析。这些选项已根据建筑物的内部分布进行了分组。已经确定了它们的技术灵活性,并概述了具有最大宽度的首选宽度范围。对于单独研究的方案,已经计算了地板(包括固定设备)的技术剖面成本,以及零周期施工成本、建筑的承重和围护结构成本。对于每个首选宽度,地板型材的材料消耗已根据施工指标进行评估:混凝土和钢材消耗(钢筋-用于钢筋混凝土路面,型材-用于技术设备),与1平方米的建成区和一个屠宰场有关。考虑到这些费用的影响,已经制定了一种对技术灵活性进行定性评估的方法。已经确定,宽度在25.20-25.40m范围内的建筑具有最大的技术灵活性。宽度在23.20-25.20 m和25.80-28.00 m之间且具有同等灵活性的建筑物也具有非常好的指标。根据所开发的方法,具有相同技术灵活性的宽度在评估成本对地板轮廓的影响时有所不同——对于较大的宽度范围,差异更大。具有最大技术灵活性的25.20米和25.40米宽度的建筑实际上是相等的,考虑到23.20米、25.80米和28.00米宽度的每1平方米建筑面积的混凝土和钢材总成本的影响,估计值的差异为2.1-4.0%。对于相同的宽度,考虑到一个养牛场的混凝土和钢材总成本的影响,为6.5%至15.9%。建议采用所开发的方法来评估地板轮廓成本对奶牛自由放养能力大的建筑技术灵活性的影响。在四排建筑中,建议宽度在25.20-25.40 m和23.20 m之间的建筑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
A new type of laboratory microdevice for distillation of lavender and herb raw materials Factors determining the competitiveness of grain production and opportunities for their digital optimization Effect of green pruning on the fruitfulness of winter buds, quantity and quality of yield in Cabernet Franc cultivar Suitability of some growing media for cashew seedling growth and development in the nursery Method for obtaining gluten-free high protein animal feeds
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1