English-medium instruction and impact on academic performance: a randomized control study

IF 2.1 2区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Applied Linguistics Review Pub Date : 2023-09-11 DOI:10.1515/applirev-2022-0093
Olle Bälter, V. Kann, Chantal Mutimukwe, Hans Malmström
{"title":"English-medium instruction and impact on academic performance: a randomized control study","authors":"Olle Bälter, V. Kann, Chantal Mutimukwe, Hans Malmström","doi":"10.1515/applirev-2022-0093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Stakeholders and researchers in higher education have long debated the consequences of English-medium instruction (EMI); a key assumption of EMI is that student’s academic learning through English should be at least as good as learning through their first language (usually the national language). This study addressed the following question: “What is the impact from English-medium instruction on students’ academic performance in an online learning environment?” “Academic performance” was measured in two ways: number of correctly answered test questions and through-put/drop-out rate. The study adopted an experimental design involving a large group (n = 2,263) randomized control study in a programming course. Student participants were randomly allocated to an English-medium version of the course (the intervention group) or a Swedish-medium version of the course (the control group). The findings were that students enrolled on the English-medium version of the course answered statistically significantly fewer test questions correctly; the EMI students also dropped out from the course to a statistically significantly higher degree compared to students enrolled on the Swedish version of the course. The conclusion of this study is thus that EMI may, under certain circumstances, have negative consequences for students’ academic performance.","PeriodicalId":46472,"journal":{"name":"Applied Linguistics Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Linguistics Review","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2022-0093","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Stakeholders and researchers in higher education have long debated the consequences of English-medium instruction (EMI); a key assumption of EMI is that student’s academic learning through English should be at least as good as learning through their first language (usually the national language). This study addressed the following question: “What is the impact from English-medium instruction on students’ academic performance in an online learning environment?” “Academic performance” was measured in two ways: number of correctly answered test questions and through-put/drop-out rate. The study adopted an experimental design involving a large group (n = 2,263) randomized control study in a programming course. Student participants were randomly allocated to an English-medium version of the course (the intervention group) or a Swedish-medium version of the course (the control group). The findings were that students enrolled on the English-medium version of the course answered statistically significantly fewer test questions correctly; the EMI students also dropped out from the course to a statistically significantly higher degree compared to students enrolled on the Swedish version of the course. The conclusion of this study is thus that EMI may, under certain circumstances, have negative consequences for students’ academic performance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英语教学与学业成绩影响:一项随机对照研究
高等教育的利益相关者和研究者长期以来一直在争论英语媒介教学(EMI)的后果。EMI的一个关键假设是,学生通过英语进行的学术学习至少应该与通过母语(通常是本国语言)进行的学习一样好。本研究探讨了以下问题:“在网络学习环境中,英语教学对学生学习成绩的影响是什么?”“学业成绩”以两种方式衡量:正确回答考试问题的数量和完成/退学率。本研究采用程序设计课程中大组(n = 2263)随机对照研究的实验设计。学生参与者被随机分配到英语版本的课程(干预组)或瑞典语版本的课程(对照组)。结果发现,参加英语授课课程的学生答对测试题目的数量在统计上显著减少;与参加瑞典版课程的学生相比,EMI学生从课程中退出的程度在统计上也明显更高。因此,本研究的结论是,在某些情况下,EMI可能对学生的学习成绩产生负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
81
期刊最新文献
The role of speaker categorization in South Korean attitudes toward North Korean accents “As a Muslim…”: on the importance of intercultural responsibility in transnational cultural exchanges Culture machines Artificial intelligence and depth ontology: implications for intercultural ethics Exploring AI for intercultural communication: open conversation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1