Los Olvidados/The Forgotten: Reconceptualizing Colonias as Viable Communities

IF 5 1区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Progress in Planning Pub Date : 2021-05-01 DOI:10.1016/j.progress.2019.100450
Deyanira Nevárez Martínez , María G. Rendón , Diego Arroyo
{"title":"Los Olvidados/The Forgotten: Reconceptualizing Colonias as Viable Communities","authors":"Deyanira Nevárez Martínez ,&nbsp;María G. Rendón ,&nbsp;Diego Arroyo","doi":"10.1016/j.progress.2019.100450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Places of concentrated poverty are typically described in terms of their deficit, not simply in financial terms, but in their social and cultural resources as well. This characterization extends to informal settlements that exist along the U.S.-Mexico border known as <em>colonias</em>, rural and peri-urban communities lacking basic infrastructure like electricity, running water, and paved roads. Drawing on one case study of a colonia in the state of Arizona, we renew attention to these communities showing how the lack of infrastructure and public services complicate everyday tasks for residents, compromising their wellbeing and life prospects. We also call attention to the allure of colonias in a context of rising inequality, highlighting their promise as viable communities where families can raise families and prosper or retire with dignity. By showing how kin and fictive kin ties propel the settlement process and provide the organizational and cultural structure to these communities, we challenge common depictions of colonias lacking a sense of community and social capital. We find social capital in colonias is best represented through “bonding ties” that provide essential forms of <em>social support,</em> the kind of help that allows the poor to “get by” or cope. We distinguish this from social capital that is garnered via “bridging ties,” to individuals with resources or in positions of influence that can create opportunities for social mobility. The tenacity of colonia residents and their practices of mutual support makes these communities resilient, but the absence of “social leverage ties,” those able and willing to broker complex bureaucratic and political processes, sustains ill conditions in colonias. Colonia residents have set root in these communities worthy of public policy concern and ought to be folded into the larger conversation of poverty concentration, segregation and housing needs in the United States. We call on urban planners, other street-level bureaucrats, and policymakers to work with these communities to bridge and broker grass root efforts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47399,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Planning","volume":"147 ","pages":"Article 100450"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.progress.2019.100450","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Planning","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305900619300327","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Places of concentrated poverty are typically described in terms of their deficit, not simply in financial terms, but in their social and cultural resources as well. This characterization extends to informal settlements that exist along the U.S.-Mexico border known as colonias, rural and peri-urban communities lacking basic infrastructure like electricity, running water, and paved roads. Drawing on one case study of a colonia in the state of Arizona, we renew attention to these communities showing how the lack of infrastructure and public services complicate everyday tasks for residents, compromising their wellbeing and life prospects. We also call attention to the allure of colonias in a context of rising inequality, highlighting their promise as viable communities where families can raise families and prosper or retire with dignity. By showing how kin and fictive kin ties propel the settlement process and provide the organizational and cultural structure to these communities, we challenge common depictions of colonias lacking a sense of community and social capital. We find social capital in colonias is best represented through “bonding ties” that provide essential forms of social support, the kind of help that allows the poor to “get by” or cope. We distinguish this from social capital that is garnered via “bridging ties,” to individuals with resources or in positions of influence that can create opportunities for social mobility. The tenacity of colonia residents and their practices of mutual support makes these communities resilient, but the absence of “social leverage ties,” those able and willing to broker complex bureaucratic and political processes, sustains ill conditions in colonias. Colonia residents have set root in these communities worthy of public policy concern and ought to be folded into the larger conversation of poverty concentration, segregation and housing needs in the United States. We call on urban planners, other street-level bureaucrats, and policymakers to work with these communities to bridge and broker grass root efforts.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
被遗忘的人/被遗忘的人:重新将殖民地视为可行的社区
贫困集中的地方通常被描述为其赤字,不仅在财政方面,而且在社会和文化资源方面。这种特征延伸到存在于美墨边境的非正式定居点,即所谓的殖民地,农村和城郊社区,缺乏基本的基础设施,如电力、自来水和铺砌的道路。通过对亚利桑那州一个殖民地的案例研究,我们再次关注这些社区,展示了基础设施和公共服务的缺乏如何使居民的日常工作复杂化,从而影响了他们的福祉和生活前景。我们还呼吁在不平等加剧的背景下,关注殖民地的吸引力,强调它们作为可行社区的希望,在那里,家庭可以养家糊口,繁荣昌盛,或有尊严地退休。通过展示亲属和有效的亲属关系如何推动定居过程,并为这些社区提供组织和文化结构,我们挑战了对殖民地缺乏社区意识和社会资本的常见描述。我们发现,殖民地的社会资本通过提供基本形式的社会支持的“纽带关系”得到了最好的体现,这种帮助使穷人能够“勉强度日”或应对。我们将其与通过“桥接关系”获得的社会资本区分开来,后者是指拥有资源或处于能够创造社会流动机会的影响力地位的个人。殖民地居民的坚韧和他们相互支持的做法使这些社区具有弹性,但缺乏“社会杠杆关系”,即那些能够并愿意协调复杂的官僚和政治程序的人,使殖民地的状况持续恶化。殖民地居民已经在这些值得公共政策关注的社区扎根,应该纳入有关美国贫困集中、种族隔离和住房需求的更大讨论中。我们呼吁城市规划者、其他基层官员和政策制定者与这些社区合作,在基层努力中架起桥梁和中间人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
1.60%
发文量
26
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: Progress in Planning is a multidisciplinary journal of research monographs offering a convenient and rapid outlet for extended papers in the field of spatial and environmental planning. Each issue comprises a single monograph of between 25,000 and 35,000 words. The journal is fully peer reviewed, has a global readership, and has been in publication since 1972.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Editorial Board Editorial Board Immigrants, slums, and housing policy: The spatial dispersal of the Ethiopian population in Israel Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1