EFFECTS OF WC, SiC, IRON AND GLASS FILLERS AND THEIR HIGH PERCENTAGE CONTENT ON ADHESIVE BOND STRENGTH OF AN ALUMINIUM ALLOY BUTT JOINT: AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY
{"title":"EFFECTS OF WC, SiC, IRON AND GLASS FILLERS AND THEIR HIGH PERCENTAGE CONTENT ON ADHESIVE BOND STRENGTH OF AN ALUMINIUM ALLOY BUTT JOINT: AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY","authors":"M. Mejbel, Mohammed Kadhim Allawi, M. H. Oudah","doi":"10.26480/jmerd.05.2019.224.231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Improving of epoxy adhesive tensile joint strength is a major interest relevant to many industries. In this study, four types of fillers were chosen (tungsten carbide, silicon carbide, iron, and glass). Fillers were in the form of powder with a particle size of 140 μm. Adherents were 6061-T6 aluminium alloys fabricated according to ASTM D 2094-00 (2014). Bonding surfaces were prepared by grinding using 400 grit emery paper. The surfaces were then chemically etched using CSA solution. Two distance copper wires were used per specimen having a diameter of 180 μm. Five replicas per adhesive condition were adopted. Four volume filler fractions were chosen (10%, 15%, 20%, and 25%). A comparison of average tensile adhesive joint strength was made between the reference (no filler specimen) and other fillers. It was concluded that SiC and iron fillers had negative results on the joint strength, with the worse results occurring at high fractions. Glass with low fractions slightly enhanced the joint strength but showed negative results when the volume fraction was increased. Tungsten carbide showed a slight improvement at 10% fraction, but a major improvement was achieved. In particular, at 20% fraction the strength was enhanced by 41.33%.","PeriodicalId":16153,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mechanical Engineering Research and Developments","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mechanical Engineering Research and Developments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26480/jmerd.05.2019.224.231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16
Abstract
Improving of epoxy adhesive tensile joint strength is a major interest relevant to many industries. In this study, four types of fillers were chosen (tungsten carbide, silicon carbide, iron, and glass). Fillers were in the form of powder with a particle size of 140 μm. Adherents were 6061-T6 aluminium alloys fabricated according to ASTM D 2094-00 (2014). Bonding surfaces were prepared by grinding using 400 grit emery paper. The surfaces were then chemically etched using CSA solution. Two distance copper wires were used per specimen having a diameter of 180 μm. Five replicas per adhesive condition were adopted. Four volume filler fractions were chosen (10%, 15%, 20%, and 25%). A comparison of average tensile adhesive joint strength was made between the reference (no filler specimen) and other fillers. It was concluded that SiC and iron fillers had negative results on the joint strength, with the worse results occurring at high fractions. Glass with low fractions slightly enhanced the joint strength but showed negative results when the volume fraction was increased. Tungsten carbide showed a slight improvement at 10% fraction, but a major improvement was achieved. In particular, at 20% fraction the strength was enhanced by 41.33%.
提高环氧胶粘剂的拉伸接头强度是许多行业关注的焦点。在这项研究中,选择了四种类型的填料(碳化钨、碳化硅、铁和玻璃)。填料为颗粒尺寸为140μm的粉末形式。粘附剂是根据ASTM D 2094-00(2014)制造的6061-T6铝合金。通过使用400粒度的金刚砂纸进行研磨来制备结合表面。然后使用CSA溶液对表面进行化学蚀刻。每个直径为180μm的样品使用两根距离铜线。每种粘合条件采用五个复制品。选择了四种体积填料组分(10%、15%、20%和25%)。对参考(无填料样品)和其他填料之间的平均拉伸粘合强度进行了比较。结果表明,SiC和铁填料对接头强度有负面影响,而在高分数时效果较差。低分数的玻璃略微提高了接头强度,但当体积分数增加时,显示出负面结果。碳化钨在10%的分数下表现出轻微的改善,但实现了重大的改善。特别地,在20%的分数下,强度提高了41.33%。
期刊介绍:
The scopes of the journal include, but are not limited to, the following topics: • Thermal Engineering and Fluids Engineering • Mechanics • Kinematics, Dynamics, & Control of Mechanical Systems • Mechatronics, Robotics and Automation • Design, Manufacturing, & Product Development • Human and Machine Haptics Specific topics of interest include: Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Analysis and Decision of Industry & Manufacturing System, Applied Mechanics, Biomechanics, CAD/CAM Integration Technology, Complex Curve Design, Manufacturing & Application, Computational Mechanics, Computer-aided Geometric Design & Simulation, Fluid Dynamics, Fluid Mechanics, General mechanics, Geomechanics, Industrial Application of CAD, Machinery and Machine Design, Machine Vision and Learning, Material Science and Processing, Mechanical Power Engineering, Mechatronics and Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, PC Guided Design and Manufacture, Precision Manufacturing & Measurement, Precision Mechanics, Production Technology, Quality & Reliability Engineering, Renewable Energy Technologies, Science and Engineering Computing, Solid Mechanics, Structural Dynamics, System Dynamics and Simulation, Systems Science and Systems Engineering, Vehicle Dynamic Performance Simulation, Virtual-tech Based System & Process-simulation, etc.