{"title":"Estudos de imaginário do jornalismo no Brasil = Imaginary studies of journalism in Brazil","authors":"Otávio Daros","doi":"10.1285/I22840753N19P233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article intends to examine, in a documented and systematized way, the main contributions of scholars of the imaginary to research in journalism in Brazil, since the mid-1990s. It begins by presenting the idea of Juremir Machado da Silva (\"journalism as an operation of information and mythologization\"), followed by Vera Franca (\"journalism as a form of sociability\"), both postgraduates under Michel Maffesoli's guidance, in France. Then, the theses of Gislene Silva (\"journalism as a mythic-symbolic manifestation\") and Ana Tais Barros (\"journalism as a potential generator of myths\") are discussed, authors also affiliated with the French tradition initiated by Gilbert Durand, in the 1960s. The investigation seeks to examine the specific findings of each research, while promoting comparison between them, in order to highlight both the similarities and the differences in the way of viewing the news media. The strongest conclusion is that, despite the theoretical repertoire shared by Brazilian academics in the area — notably around the anthropological theory of the imaginary and the sociology of everyday life — their journalistic analyzes show conflicting results on the phenomenon in contemporary times.","PeriodicalId":40441,"journal":{"name":"H-ermes-Journal of Communication","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"H-ermes-Journal of Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1285/I22840753N19P233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article intends to examine, in a documented and systematized way, the main contributions of scholars of the imaginary to research in journalism in Brazil, since the mid-1990s. It begins by presenting the idea of Juremir Machado da Silva ("journalism as an operation of information and mythologization"), followed by Vera Franca ("journalism as a form of sociability"), both postgraduates under Michel Maffesoli's guidance, in France. Then, the theses of Gislene Silva ("journalism as a mythic-symbolic manifestation") and Ana Tais Barros ("journalism as a potential generator of myths") are discussed, authors also affiliated with the French tradition initiated by Gilbert Durand, in the 1960s. The investigation seeks to examine the specific findings of each research, while promoting comparison between them, in order to highlight both the similarities and the differences in the way of viewing the news media. The strongest conclusion is that, despite the theoretical repertoire shared by Brazilian academics in the area — notably around the anthropological theory of the imaginary and the sociology of everyday life — their journalistic analyzes show conflicting results on the phenomenon in contemporary times.
Estudos de imaginário do jornalismo no Brasil =巴西新闻业的想象研究
本文试图以系统化的方式,检视自1990年代中期以来,虚构学者对巴西新闻研究的主要贡献。它首先提出了jurremir Machado da Silva(“新闻作为一种信息和神话化的操作”)的想法,然后是Vera Franca(“新闻作为一种社交形式”),两人都是米歇尔·马费索利指导下的法国研究生。然后,讨论了Gislene Silva(“新闻作为神话-象征的表现”)和Ana Tais Barros(“新闻作为神话的潜在产生者”)的论文,他们也是1960年代由Gilbert Durand发起的法国传统的作者。调查旨在审查每项研究的具体发现,同时促进它们之间的比较,以突出观看新闻媒体方式的相似之处和差异。最有力的结论是,尽管巴西学者在这一领域有共同的理论——特别是关于想象的人类学理论和日常生活的社会学——但他们的新闻分析显示出当代现象的相互矛盾的结果。