Assessing cognitive functioning in ALS: A focus on frontal lobe processes

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration Pub Date : 2017-04-03 DOI:10.1080/21678421.2016.1248977
S. Gillingham, Y. Yunusova, A. Ganda, E. Rogaeva, S. Black, D. Stuss, L. Zinman
{"title":"Assessing cognitive functioning in ALS: A focus on frontal lobe processes","authors":"S. Gillingham, Y. Yunusova, A. Ganda, E. Rogaeva, S. Black, D. Stuss, L. Zinman","doi":"10.1080/21678421.2016.1248977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective: It is generally acknowledged that at least 50% of individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) will exhibit cognitive deficits outside of the characteristic motor neuron involvement. However, a specific cognitive profile has been difficult to ascertain due to disease-related testing barriers and limitations in the sensitivity and specificity of available assessment methods. This study assessed the level of functioning of extramotor frontal cognitive processes in ALS, and the amount of change in the functioning in these processes over time as disease progresses. Methods: Empirical tests validated for a model of frontal lobe functioning were modified into an assessment battery appropriate for individuals with ALS in a clinical setting (the ALS-CFB, Computerised Frontal Battery). Twenty ALS participants and 36 age- and education-matched neurologically healthy controls were tested, and a sub-sample of each group (11 ALS and 20 controls) re-tested after approximately nine months. Results and conclusions: Compared to standard neuropsychological screening tests that did not show a difference between ALS participants and healthy controls, the ALS-CFB illustrated a profile of extramotor frontal dysfunction involving energisation (preparing the neural system to respond) and executive functions, a profile that may be indicative of the nature of neurodegeneration in ALS.","PeriodicalId":7740,"journal":{"name":"Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration","volume":"18 1","pages":"182 - 192"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21678421.2016.1248977","citationCount":"28","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21678421.2016.1248977","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

Abstract

Abstract Objective: It is generally acknowledged that at least 50% of individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) will exhibit cognitive deficits outside of the characteristic motor neuron involvement. However, a specific cognitive profile has been difficult to ascertain due to disease-related testing barriers and limitations in the sensitivity and specificity of available assessment methods. This study assessed the level of functioning of extramotor frontal cognitive processes in ALS, and the amount of change in the functioning in these processes over time as disease progresses. Methods: Empirical tests validated for a model of frontal lobe functioning were modified into an assessment battery appropriate for individuals with ALS in a clinical setting (the ALS-CFB, Computerised Frontal Battery). Twenty ALS participants and 36 age- and education-matched neurologically healthy controls were tested, and a sub-sample of each group (11 ALS and 20 controls) re-tested after approximately nine months. Results and conclusions: Compared to standard neuropsychological screening tests that did not show a difference between ALS participants and healthy controls, the ALS-CFB illustrated a profile of extramotor frontal dysfunction involving energisation (preparing the neural system to respond) and executive functions, a profile that may be indicative of the nature of neurodegeneration in ALS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估ALS患者的认知功能:对额叶过程的关注
摘要目的:人们普遍认为,至少50%的肌萎缩侧索硬化症(ALS)患者会在特征性运动神经元受累之外表现出认知缺陷。然而,由于与疾病相关的测试障碍以及现有评估方法的敏感性和特异性的局限性,很难确定具体的认知特征。这项研究评估了ALS运动外额叶认知过程的功能水平,以及随着疾病进展,这些过程的功能随时间的变化量。方法:将额叶功能模型验证的经验测试修改为适用于临床环境中ALS患者的评估组(ALS-CFB,计算机化额叶组)。对20名ALS参与者和36名年龄和教育程度匹配的神经健康对照进行了测试,并在大约9个月后对每组的一个子样本(11名ALS和20名对照)进行了重新测试。结果和结论:与标准的神经心理学筛查测试相比,ALS参与者和健康对照组之间没有差异,ALS-CFB显示了运动外额叶功能障碍的特征,包括能量(使神经系统做好反应的准备)和执行功能,这一特征可能表明ALS神经退行性变的性质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
10.70%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration is an exciting new initiative. It represents a timely expansion of the journal Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis in response to the clinical, imaging pathological and genetic overlap between ALS and frontotemporal dementia. The expanded journal provides outstanding coverage of research in a wide range of issues related to motor neuron diseases, especially ALS (Lou Gehrig’s disease) and cognitive decline associated with frontotemporal degeneration. The journal also covers related disorders of the neuroaxis when relevant to these core conditions.
期刊最新文献
The correlation between social support, coping style, advance care planning readiness, and quality of life in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a cross-sectional study. Effects of COVID-19 on motor neuron disease mortality in the United States: a population-based cross-sectional study SOD1 gene screening in ALS – frequency of mutations, patients’ attitudes to genetic information and transition to tofersen treatment in a multi-center program How to break the news in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/motor neuron disease: practical guidelines from experts A nurse coaching intervention to improve support to individuals living with ALS.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1