Experiential Learning and Cultural Competence: What Do Participants in Short-Term Experiences in Global Health Learn About Culture?

Peter S. Cahn , Sara L. Smoller
{"title":"Experiential Learning and Cultural Competence: What Do Participants in Short-Term Experiences in Global Health Learn About Culture?","authors":"Peter S. Cahn ,&nbsp;Sara L. Smoller","doi":"10.1016/j.hpe.2019.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Short-term experiences in global health (STEGHs) have become a popular form of experiential learning in health professions education and provide an ideal setting to introduce the role of culture in health. Critics of the concept of cultural competence fear that learners will treat culture as a simplistic list of traits that denies the fluidity of culture and obscures other factors that contribute to health. To reduce disparities, they say, health professionals should approach culture in context. The purpose of this study was to explore how returning STEGH participants view the role of culture in health and apply it to subsequent clinical encounters.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>The authors convened focus groups of graduate students recently returned from three different STEGHs at a single health sciences institution. They used directed content analysis on the transcripts to identify student insights about how culture affected interactions with patients and clients in the host country and upon return to the United States.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Focus group participants did not form strong impressions of the specific culture where they traveled. Two broad themes emerged about the role of culture in health and health care delivery: taking less resource-intensive approaches to treatment and recognizing the importance of culturally appropriate communication in health care delivery.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Health professions students participating in these STEGHs did not demonstrate a view of culture as a static list of traits. Rather, their understanding of culture included an acknowledgement of structural conditions that affect the availability of resources and the need to avoid making assumptions about patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93562,"journal":{"name":"Health professions education","volume":"6 2","pages":"Pages 230-237"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.hpe.2019.11.002","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health professions education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452301119300914","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Purpose

Short-term experiences in global health (STEGHs) have become a popular form of experiential learning in health professions education and provide an ideal setting to introduce the role of culture in health. Critics of the concept of cultural competence fear that learners will treat culture as a simplistic list of traits that denies the fluidity of culture and obscures other factors that contribute to health. To reduce disparities, they say, health professionals should approach culture in context. The purpose of this study was to explore how returning STEGH participants view the role of culture in health and apply it to subsequent clinical encounters.

Method

The authors convened focus groups of graduate students recently returned from three different STEGHs at a single health sciences institution. They used directed content analysis on the transcripts to identify student insights about how culture affected interactions with patients and clients in the host country and upon return to the United States.

Results

Focus group participants did not form strong impressions of the specific culture where they traveled. Two broad themes emerged about the role of culture in health and health care delivery: taking less resource-intensive approaches to treatment and recognizing the importance of culturally appropriate communication in health care delivery.

Discussion

Health professions students participating in these STEGHs did not demonstrate a view of culture as a static list of traits. Rather, their understanding of culture included an acknowledgement of structural conditions that affect the availability of resources and the need to avoid making assumptions about patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体验式学习与文化能力:全球健康短期体验的参与者对文化有什么了解?
目的全球卫生短期经验(STEGHs)已成为卫生专业教育中流行的体验式学习形式,并为介绍文化在卫生中的作用提供了理想的环境。对文化能力概念持批评态度的人担心,学习者会将文化视为一种简单的特征列表,这种特征否认了文化的流动性,并掩盖了其他有助于健康的因素。他们说,为了减少差异,卫生专业人员应该在语境中对待文化。本研究的目的是探讨回国的STEGH参与者如何看待文化在健康中的作用,并将其应用于随后的临床遭遇。方法:作者召集了最近从同一健康科学机构的三个不同STEGHs返回的研究生焦点小组。他们对成绩单进行了直接内容分析,以确定学生对文化如何影响与东道国患者和客户的互动以及回到美国后的见解。结果:焦点小组的参与者对他们旅行的特定文化没有形成强烈的印象。关于文化在保健和提供保健方面的作用,出现了两个广泛的主题:采取资源密集程度较低的治疗方法,以及认识到在提供保健方面进行文化上适当的交流的重要性。参与这些STEGHs的健康专业学生并没有将文化视为一个静态的特征列表。相反,他们对文化的理解包括对影响资源可用性的结构性条件的承认,以及避免对患者做出假设的需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
38 weeks
期刊最新文献
Learning Harmony: Medical Student Reflections on the Intersection of the Arts & Humanities and Medicine, A Mixed Methods Study. Faculty Perceptions of Health Professional Students' Hybrid-Online Learning Strategies: A Multi-Center Qualitative Study The Effect of Online Learning on Students' Practical Assessment Results During the COVID-19 Lockdown Period Classroom Versus Online Team-based Learning: Effects on Students’ Learning and Performance Students’ Perceptions and Insights Towards Online Learning During Covid-19 Crises
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1