Model Cities: The Landlord, New York Mayor John Lindsay, and the Challenges of Urban Renewal

IF 0.1 3区 艺术学 0 FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION JOURNAL OF FILM AND VIDEO Pub Date : 2020-11-07 DOI:10.5406/jfilmvideo.72.3-4.0048
Rick Armstrong
{"title":"Model Cities: The Landlord, New York Mayor John Lindsay, and the Challenges of Urban Renewal","authors":"Rick Armstrong","doi":"10.5406/jfilmvideo.72.3-4.0048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"©2020 by the board of trustees of the university of illinois hal ashby made films that succeeded with both critics and audiences in the 1970s (Cook 110). His films often dealt with the major political issues of the time—for instance, American society’s cynicism toward the military in The Last Detail in 1973; the superficiality of American politics in Shampoo in 1975; and the personal and political damage wrought by the Vietnam War in Coming Home in 1978. Ashby’s films stand as historical documents of their time. Aaron Hunter, who wrote one of the few scholarly examinations of the director, asserts that Ashby stands out among the 1970s filmmakers for exploring the way politics impacts people’s personal lives (87). Arguably, his first film, The Landlord, is his most historically prescient. Its portrayal of a wealthy white man buying a tenement house in a predominantly African American Park Slope in Brooklyn predicted the gentrification of the borough that began in the 1980s and continues to be an issue (Zukin 57–58). It also represents a striking document of New York in its depiction of African American urban poverty that bred a “volcanic” anger that “would be heard” according to a Life magazine cover story in 1968 (Newfield 87). Despite its rich thematic and historical significance, little has been written about the film since its release in 1970. The film reflects the urban troubles experienced by major cities like New York at the time and anticipates the changes New York would experience in its redevelopment to an economic juggernaut. At the time, such a future seemed far away. During the making of The Landlord in the summer of 1969, New York’s Republican mayor John V. Lindsay was in a bitter battle for his reelection. After his own party rejected him in its primary, Lindsay was reelected on a third-party line with a large turnout of black voters. Four years earlier, the mayor had come to office with the promise of leading an urban renaissance in New York. However, those expectations confronted chronic urban problems: middle-class flight, significant decrease in manufacturing, and the concomitant rise of an urban underclass, issues directly and indirectly depicted in The Landlord. In a 1971 interview with the editorial staff of the New York Amsterdam News, Lindsay asserted his “disappointment” that his administration had not done more in lowerclass areas (McCall, “A Black Appraisal” A2). After Lindsay acknowledged the conservative tilt of the Republican Party and switched to the Democratic Party in August 1971, the newspaper printed a series of editorials on his leadership by various black thinkers. The editorial staff asserted that Mayor Lindsay was neither a “‘honkey’ nor a white knight” but someone who seemed “to be sincerely searching for answers and genuine solutions to the problems of New York City and urban America” (“On John Lindsay” A6). On the flip side, the paper’s editor, H. Carl McCall, acknowledged that Lindsay spoke well to African Americans, making them “feel good . . . But the real issue is not that we Model Cities: The Landlord, New York Mayor John Lindsay, and the Challenges of Urban Renewal","PeriodicalId":43116,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF FILM AND VIDEO","volume":"72 1","pages":"48 - 63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF FILM AND VIDEO","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5406/jfilmvideo.72.3-4.0048","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

©2020 by the board of trustees of the university of illinois hal ashby made films that succeeded with both critics and audiences in the 1970s (Cook 110). His films often dealt with the major political issues of the time—for instance, American society’s cynicism toward the military in The Last Detail in 1973; the superficiality of American politics in Shampoo in 1975; and the personal and political damage wrought by the Vietnam War in Coming Home in 1978. Ashby’s films stand as historical documents of their time. Aaron Hunter, who wrote one of the few scholarly examinations of the director, asserts that Ashby stands out among the 1970s filmmakers for exploring the way politics impacts people’s personal lives (87). Arguably, his first film, The Landlord, is his most historically prescient. Its portrayal of a wealthy white man buying a tenement house in a predominantly African American Park Slope in Brooklyn predicted the gentrification of the borough that began in the 1980s and continues to be an issue (Zukin 57–58). It also represents a striking document of New York in its depiction of African American urban poverty that bred a “volcanic” anger that “would be heard” according to a Life magazine cover story in 1968 (Newfield 87). Despite its rich thematic and historical significance, little has been written about the film since its release in 1970. The film reflects the urban troubles experienced by major cities like New York at the time and anticipates the changes New York would experience in its redevelopment to an economic juggernaut. At the time, such a future seemed far away. During the making of The Landlord in the summer of 1969, New York’s Republican mayor John V. Lindsay was in a bitter battle for his reelection. After his own party rejected him in its primary, Lindsay was reelected on a third-party line with a large turnout of black voters. Four years earlier, the mayor had come to office with the promise of leading an urban renaissance in New York. However, those expectations confronted chronic urban problems: middle-class flight, significant decrease in manufacturing, and the concomitant rise of an urban underclass, issues directly and indirectly depicted in The Landlord. In a 1971 interview with the editorial staff of the New York Amsterdam News, Lindsay asserted his “disappointment” that his administration had not done more in lowerclass areas (McCall, “A Black Appraisal” A2). After Lindsay acknowledged the conservative tilt of the Republican Party and switched to the Democratic Party in August 1971, the newspaper printed a series of editorials on his leadership by various black thinkers. The editorial staff asserted that Mayor Lindsay was neither a “‘honkey’ nor a white knight” but someone who seemed “to be sincerely searching for answers and genuine solutions to the problems of New York City and urban America” (“On John Lindsay” A6). On the flip side, the paper’s editor, H. Carl McCall, acknowledged that Lindsay spoke well to African Americans, making them “feel good . . . But the real issue is not that we Model Cities: The Landlord, New York Mayor John Lindsay, and the Challenges of Urban Renewal
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
模范城市:房东、纽约市长约翰·林赛与城市更新的挑战
©2020由伊利诺伊大学董事会哈尔阿什比制作的电影,成功的评论家和观众在20世纪70年代(库克110)。他的电影经常涉及当时的重大政治问题——例如,1973年的《最后细节》(the Last Detail)中美国社会对军队的冷嘲热讽;1975年《香波》中美国政治的肤浅;以及1978年《归来》中越南战争对个人和政治造成的伤害。阿什比的电影是他们那个时代的历史文献。亚伦·亨特(Aaron Hunter)撰写了为数不多的对这位导演的学术研究,他断言,阿什比在20世纪70年代的电影制作人中脱颖而出,因为他探索了政治对人们个人生活的影响(87)。可以说,他的第一部电影《地主》是他最具历史先见之明的一部电影。它描绘了一个富有的白人在布鲁克林一个以非洲裔美国人为主的公园坡(Park Slope)购买一套廉租公寓的情景,预示着这个自20世纪80年代开始的地区的士绅化(gentrification),这一直是一个问题(Zukin 57-58)。根据1968年《生活》杂志的封面故事(Newfield 87),它也代表了纽约对非裔美国人城市贫困的描绘,这孕育了“火山”般的愤怒,“将被听到”。尽管它有着丰富的主题和历史意义,但自1970年上映以来,关于这部电影的文章很少。这部电影反映了当时像纽约这样的大城市所经历的城市问题,并预测了纽约在重新发展为经济强国的过程中所经历的变化。在当时,这样的未来似乎很遥远。1969年夏天,在拍摄《房东》的过程中,纽约的共和党市长约翰·v·林赛(John V. Lindsay)正在为连任而进行激烈的竞选。在他自己的政党在初选中拒绝了他之后,林赛凭借大量黑人选民的参与,以第三方身份再次当选。四年前,市长上任时承诺领导纽约的城市复兴。然而,这些期望面临着长期的城市问题:中产阶级的逃离,制造业的显著下降,以及随之而来的城市下层阶级的崛起,这些问题在《房东》中直接或间接地描述了。1971年,在接受《纽约阿姆斯特丹新闻》(New York Amsterdam News)编辑部的采访时,林赛对他的政府未能在下层社会做得更多表示“失望”(McCall,“a Black Appraisal”A2)。1971年8月,林赛承认共和党的保守倾向并转投民主党后,《纽约时报》刊登了一系列关于他的领导能力的社论。编辑人员断言,林赛市长既不是“妓女”,也不是“白衣骑士”,而是一个似乎“真诚地为纽约市和美国城市的问题寻找答案和真正的解决方案”的人(“论约翰·林赛”A6)。另一方面,报纸的编辑H. Carl McCall承认林赛对非裔美国人说话很好,让他们“感觉很好……但真正的问题不是我们的模范城市:房东,纽约市长约翰·林赛,以及城市更新的挑战
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JOURNAL OF FILM AND VIDEO
JOURNAL OF FILM AND VIDEO FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: The Journal of Film and Video, an internationally respected forum, focuses on scholarship in the fields of film and video production, history, theory, criticism, and aesthetics. Article features include film and related media, problems of education in these fields, and the function of film and video in society. The Journal does not ascribe to any specific method but expects articles to shed light on the views and teaching of the production and study of film and video.
期刊最新文献
Documentary Film and the Flint Water Crisis: Incorporating the Sociological Imagination Editor's Introduction Automotive Associations in Post–New Wave Films by Czech Directors Audiovisual Silence: A Lever for Narrative Change and Transition Facing the End of the World: Take Shelter as Horror Ecocinema
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1