Doubting radiocarbon dating from in-slag charcoal

IF 0.2 4区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY Archeologicke Rozhledy Pub Date : 2018-10-01 DOI:10.35686/ar.2018.14
Guntram Gassmann, A. Schäfer
{"title":"Doubting radiocarbon dating from in-slag charcoal","authors":"Guntram Gassmann, A. Schäfer","doi":"10.35686/ar.2018.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A Roman-Period bloomery smelting site had been excavated in the Lahn valley at Wetzlar-Dalheim in central Germany during 2006–2012. The production unit consisted of a big rectangular workshop pit with 13 slag pit-furnaces, two waste dumps and a small sunken hut. The stratigraphical sequence, along with abundant pottery and small finds, allows the dating of short-lived smelting activity to a time slot around the third quarter of the first century AD. As a first series of radiocarbon measurements from in-slag charcoal samples resulted in a bewildering date range from the Iron Age right back into the Neolithic, a second dating series has been undertaken. This time exclusively charcoal samples taken from the bottom of the furnace pits have been analysed. The resulting dates fit to the archaeologically derived dating. It is clear that the 14C content of the in-slag charcoal samples must have been altered already during the process in antiquity. With none of the analysed dates younger than the archaeologically fixed date of the bloomery production unit, it is obvious that a contamination with fossil carbon must have taken place. The wide and inconsistent date range suggests that fossil carbon has entered the metallurgical system within the furnace in an uncontrollable manner. The observed phenomenon has wide implications for other metallurgical sites with high temperature processes under strongly reducing conditions. Charcoal samples from such sites, especially from inside slags, might be contaminated to an unpredictable degree and produce seemingly older dates. A first review of previously published data series calls for a reconsideration of the reliability of radiocarbon dates from metallurgical slags.","PeriodicalId":54176,"journal":{"name":"Archeologicke Rozhledy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archeologicke Rozhledy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35686/ar.2018.14","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

A Roman-Period bloomery smelting site had been excavated in the Lahn valley at Wetzlar-Dalheim in central Germany during 2006–2012. The production unit consisted of a big rectangular workshop pit with 13 slag pit-furnaces, two waste dumps and a small sunken hut. The stratigraphical sequence, along with abundant pottery and small finds, allows the dating of short-lived smelting activity to a time slot around the third quarter of the first century AD. As a first series of radiocarbon measurements from in-slag charcoal samples resulted in a bewildering date range from the Iron Age right back into the Neolithic, a second dating series has been undertaken. This time exclusively charcoal samples taken from the bottom of the furnace pits have been analysed. The resulting dates fit to the archaeologically derived dating. It is clear that the 14C content of the in-slag charcoal samples must have been altered already during the process in antiquity. With none of the analysed dates younger than the archaeologically fixed date of the bloomery production unit, it is obvious that a contamination with fossil carbon must have taken place. The wide and inconsistent date range suggests that fossil carbon has entered the metallurgical system within the furnace in an uncontrollable manner. The observed phenomenon has wide implications for other metallurgical sites with high temperature processes under strongly reducing conditions. Charcoal samples from such sites, especially from inside slags, might be contaminated to an unpredictable degree and produce seemingly older dates. A first review of previously published data series calls for a reconsideration of the reliability of radiocarbon dates from metallurgical slags.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
怀疑炉渣炭的放射性碳定年法
2006年至2012年期间,在德国中部Wetzlar-Dalheim的Lahn山谷中挖掘了一个罗马时期的bloomery冶炼遗址。生产单元由一个大的矩形车间坑,13个渣坑炉,两个废物堆和一个小的凹屋组成。地层序列,以及大量的陶器和小型发现,可以将短暂的冶炼活动定在公元1世纪的第三季度左右。由于对炉渣炭样品进行的第一系列放射性碳测量得出了一个令人困惑的年代范围,从铁器时代一直追溯到新石器时代,因此进行了第二次测定。这次只分析了从炉坑底部采集的木炭样本。由此得出的年代与考古学上得出的年代吻合。很明显,在古代的过程中,炉渣炭样品的14C含量一定已经发生了变化。由于分析的日期都没有比考古学上确定的开花植物生产单位的日期更早,很明显,化石碳的污染一定发生过。广泛而不一致的日期范围表明,化石碳以一种不可控的方式进入了炉内的冶金系统。观察到的现象对其他具有强还原条件下高温过程的冶金场所具有广泛的意义。来自这些地点的木炭样本,尤其是来自炉渣内部的木炭样本,可能会被污染到不可预测的程度,并产生看似更古老的日期。对先前发表的数据系列的第一次审查要求重新考虑冶金渣放射性碳日期的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Archeologicke Rozhledy
Archeologicke Rozhledy ARCHAEOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
33.30%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: Archeologické rozhledy jsou recenzovaný časopis. Příspěvky procházejí recenzním řízením, jehož výsledek slouží k formulaci vyjádření redakce. Za věcný obsah příspěvků odpovídá autor. Příspěvky nejsou honorovány. Nezbytnou součástí každého článku je max. třístránkový český podklad pro překlad, nebo dvou až čtyřstránkový cizojazyčný souhrn, dále český abstrakt postihující cíl práce, v rozsahu 7-12 řádků, a 5-7 klíčových slov, kontaktní adresa autora.
期刊最新文献
Pavel Vařeka a kolektiv autorů: Svědectví archeologie o tzv. cikánském táboře v Letech. Význam histotafonomie a terénní antropologie při rekonstrukci pohřebního ritu kultury se šňůrovou keramikou na Moravě 50 let petroarcheologie. 6. mezinárodní petroarcheologické sympozium, Wrocław 24.–25. 9. 2020 Organické nádoby na vodu ze studny kultury s lineární keramikou v Mohelnici, okr. Šumperk Did they leave or not?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1