Is Saul the Second Goliath of 1 Samuel? The Rhetoric & Polemics of the David/Goliath Story in 1 Samuel

IF 0.1 3区 哲学 0 RELIGION Scandinavian Journal of the Old Testament Pub Date : 2020-07-02 DOI:10.1080/09018328.2020.1805206
M. Michael
{"title":"Is Saul the Second Goliath of 1 Samuel? The Rhetoric & Polemics of the David/Goliath Story in 1 Samuel","authors":"M. Michael","doi":"10.1080/09018328.2020.1805206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The story of David and Goliath has narrowly been interpreted as the dramatic victory of an underdog—David over a formidable Philistine giant—Goliath. This understanding of the story has largely dominated popular and scholarly interpretations of 1 Samuel 17. However, this typical reading of the story often ignores the intertextual character, the polemic intent and the rhetorical agenda of the David/Goliath story to the overall reading of the book of 1 Samuel. Departing from this approach, the paper underscores the anticipatory character of David/Goliath story as an important literary preview to the subsequent conflicts between David and Saul in 1 Samuel. Thus, the paper engages the intertextual connections and the literary significance of the David/Goliath story to the David/Saul conflicts in the book of Samuel. Significantly, the paper situates Saul on the same character pole as the Philistine villain–Goliath, and identifies specific intertextual elements of the story which subtly enforce these polemic intents. Interestingly, two Goliaths emerged from the narratives of 1 Samuel–namely the Philistine giant from Gath, and the giant-like figure of king Saul from Gibeah. Thus, Saul is largely implicated by his subtle representation as another “Goliath” in the polemic contentions and intertextual mapping of 1 Samuel.","PeriodicalId":42456,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of the Old Testament","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09018328.2020.1805206","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of the Old Testament","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09018328.2020.1805206","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The story of David and Goliath has narrowly been interpreted as the dramatic victory of an underdog—David over a formidable Philistine giant—Goliath. This understanding of the story has largely dominated popular and scholarly interpretations of 1 Samuel 17. However, this typical reading of the story often ignores the intertextual character, the polemic intent and the rhetorical agenda of the David/Goliath story to the overall reading of the book of 1 Samuel. Departing from this approach, the paper underscores the anticipatory character of David/Goliath story as an important literary preview to the subsequent conflicts between David and Saul in 1 Samuel. Thus, the paper engages the intertextual connections and the literary significance of the David/Goliath story to the David/Saul conflicts in the book of Samuel. Significantly, the paper situates Saul on the same character pole as the Philistine villain–Goliath, and identifies specific intertextual elements of the story which subtly enforce these polemic intents. Interestingly, two Goliaths emerged from the narratives of 1 Samuel–namely the Philistine giant from Gath, and the giant-like figure of king Saul from Gibeah. Thus, Saul is largely implicated by his subtle representation as another “Goliath” in the polemic contentions and intertextual mapping of 1 Samuel.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
扫罗是撒母耳记上的第二个歌利亚吗?撒母耳记上大卫/歌利亚故事的修辞与论战
摘要大卫和歌利亚的故事被狭隘地解释为一个失败者大卫戏剧性地战胜了一个强大的非利士巨人歌利亚。这种对故事的理解在很大程度上主导了对《撒母耳记》17的流行和学术解读。然而,这种典型的故事阅读往往忽略了大卫/歌利亚故事的互文性、论战意图和修辞议程,而不是对《撒母耳记》的整体阅读。与此不同的是,本文强调了大卫/歌利亚故事的预期性,作为《撒母耳记》中大卫与扫罗随后冲突的重要文学预演。因此,本文探讨了《撒母耳记》中大卫/歌利亚故事对大卫/扫罗冲突的互文联系和文学意义。值得注意的是,这篇论文将索尔与非利士恶棍歌利亚置于同一个人物极上,并确定了故事中微妙地强化这些争论意图的特定互文元素。有趣的是,撒母耳一书中出现了两个巨人,一个是来自迦特的非利士巨人,另一个是基比亚的扫罗王。因此,索尔在很大程度上被他作为另一个“巨人”的微妙表现所牵连,在《撒母耳记》1的争论和互文映射中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
50.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Samuel as Jack-in-the-Box: The Woman of Endor as a Hidden Polemical Story* The Influence of Greek Historiography in 1 Maccabees’ Battle Exhortations An Examination of the Sprouting Horn in Ps 132,17 and Ezek 29,21 Daniel’s Mysticism of Resistance in its Seleucid ContextTimothy L. Seals, Daniel’s Mysticism of Resistance in its Seleucid Context . Lanham-Boulder-New York-London: Lexington Books/Fortress Academic, 2022. X + 166 pp. $95.00. Posttraumatic Growth and Deuteronomistic Redaction of Jer 31,31-34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1