Institutional navigation of oceans governance: Lessons from Russia and the United States Indigenous multi-level whaling governance in the Arctic

IF 4.4 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Earth System Governance Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.esg.2022.100154
Abigail M. York , Eduard Zdor , Shauna BurnSilver , Tatiana Degai , Maria Monakhova , Svetlana Isakova , Andrey N. Petrov , Morgan Kempf
{"title":"Institutional navigation of oceans governance: Lessons from Russia and the United States Indigenous multi-level whaling governance in the Arctic","authors":"Abigail M. York ,&nbsp;Eduard Zdor ,&nbsp;Shauna BurnSilver ,&nbsp;Tatiana Degai ,&nbsp;Maria Monakhova ,&nbsp;Svetlana Isakova ,&nbsp;Andrey N. Petrov ,&nbsp;Morgan Kempf","doi":"10.1016/j.esg.2022.100154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Oceans governance occurs through overlapping, multi-level institutions that often fail to recognize Indigenous sovereignty and self-determination. The International Whaling Commission (IWC) provides pathways for recognizing Indigenous rights. However, observed power asymmetries and cross-level local to international conflicts threatened subsistence rights and generated research and advocacy fatigue for Chukchi, Iñupiat, Saint Lawrence Island Yupik, and Siberian Yupik communities in the USA and Russia. We conduct an institutional analysis of Indigenous bowhead whaling governance based upon lived experiences of Indigenous authors, primary documents from co-management organizations, national agencies, the IWC, and extant literature. We explore how Indigenous co-management organizations increased sovereignty and self-determination for communities whose culture, identities, livelihoods, and origins are intimately connected to marine mammal hunting. Our study also provides lessons for the United Nations Decade for Ocean Science on the challenges of institutional navigation and the role of embodied resurgent practice amongst Indigenous communities within Earth system governance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":33685,"journal":{"name":"Earth System Governance","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100154"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589811622000234/pdfft?md5=27d93fb42d04e3098029641cfe468440&pid=1-s2.0-S2589811622000234-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth System Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589811622000234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Oceans governance occurs through overlapping, multi-level institutions that often fail to recognize Indigenous sovereignty and self-determination. The International Whaling Commission (IWC) provides pathways for recognizing Indigenous rights. However, observed power asymmetries and cross-level local to international conflicts threatened subsistence rights and generated research and advocacy fatigue for Chukchi, Iñupiat, Saint Lawrence Island Yupik, and Siberian Yupik communities in the USA and Russia. We conduct an institutional analysis of Indigenous bowhead whaling governance based upon lived experiences of Indigenous authors, primary documents from co-management organizations, national agencies, the IWC, and extant literature. We explore how Indigenous co-management organizations increased sovereignty and self-determination for communities whose culture, identities, livelihoods, and origins are intimately connected to marine mammal hunting. Our study also provides lessons for the United Nations Decade for Ocean Science on the challenges of institutional navigation and the role of embodied resurgent practice amongst Indigenous communities within Earth system governance.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
海洋治理的制度性导航:来自俄罗斯和美国北极地区土著多层次捕鲸治理的经验教训
海洋治理是通过重叠的多层次机构进行的,这些机构往往不承认土著主权和自决。国际捕鲸委员会(IWC)提供了承认土著权利的途径。然而,观察到的权力不对称和跨层次的地方与国际冲突威胁到生存权,并对美国和俄罗斯的楚科奇族、Iñupiat、圣劳伦斯岛尤皮克族和西伯利亚尤皮克族产生了研究和倡导疲劳。我们根据土著作者的生活经验、来自共同管理组织、国家机构、国际捕鲸委员会和现存文献的主要文件,对土著弓头鲸的治理进行了制度分析。我们探讨了土著共同管理组织如何为其文化、身份、生计和起源与海洋哺乳动物狩猎密切相关的社区增加主权和自决。我们的研究还为联合国海洋科学十年提供了关于机构导航的挑战以及土著社区体现的复兴实践在地球系统治理中的作用的经验教训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
14.30%
发文量
31
审稿时长
35 weeks
期刊最新文献
Diversifying climate policy advice: Research agenda on the expertise of national climate councils Jurisdictional approaches to sustainable agro-commodity governance: The state of knowledge and future research directions Towards sustainable governance of freshwater sand – A resource regime approach Exploring the rights of nature in freshwater and marine ecosystems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1