Teaching or Not Teaching Empathic Listening to Future Physicians? Historical Roots and Ongoing Challenges

Q1 Arts and Humanities International Journal of Listening Pub Date : 2019-11-21 DOI:10.1080/10904018.2019.1684296
H. Meldrum, Rebekah Apple
{"title":"Teaching or Not Teaching Empathic Listening to Future Physicians? Historical Roots and Ongoing Challenges","authors":"H. Meldrum, Rebekah Apple","doi":"10.1080/10904018.2019.1684296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This commentary raises questions regarding empathy training as a core objective of foundational skills courses in most U.S. medical schools. While a number of educational activities focused on the cultivation of empathy have been introduced by medical educators, students spend very little time acquiring specific key communication competencies like listening. Medical school faculty have written about the importance of empathy, but have not availed themselves of the research that truly defines empathic listening, nor have they shifted their focus to exactly how these skills can be taught. In the absence of guidance about active listening as a therapeutic micro-skill, it is unlikely that physicians-in-training can consistently produce verbal responses that allow patients to feel that they are heard and understood. Thus, medical students may have communication deficiencies, including the inability to establish meaningful rapport with patients. The predicament is maintained because most physician faculty do not reach back to draw on prior models of interpersonal sensitivity training, nor do they cross disciplinary lines beyond medical school curricula to synthesize lessons from psychology and communication studies. This is problematic, because the development of meaningful relationships with patients has been demonstrated to improve outcomes.","PeriodicalId":35114,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Listening","volume":"35 1","pages":"209 - 215"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10904018.2019.1684296","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Listening","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2019.1684296","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract This commentary raises questions regarding empathy training as a core objective of foundational skills courses in most U.S. medical schools. While a number of educational activities focused on the cultivation of empathy have been introduced by medical educators, students spend very little time acquiring specific key communication competencies like listening. Medical school faculty have written about the importance of empathy, but have not availed themselves of the research that truly defines empathic listening, nor have they shifted their focus to exactly how these skills can be taught. In the absence of guidance about active listening as a therapeutic micro-skill, it is unlikely that physicians-in-training can consistently produce verbal responses that allow patients to feel that they are heard and understood. Thus, medical students may have communication deficiencies, including the inability to establish meaningful rapport with patients. The predicament is maintained because most physician faculty do not reach back to draw on prior models of interpersonal sensitivity training, nor do they cross disciplinary lines beyond medical school curricula to synthesize lessons from psychology and communication studies. This is problematic, because the development of meaningful relationships with patients has been demonstrated to improve outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教不教未来医生共情倾听?历史根源和当前挑战
这篇评论提出了关于移情训练作为大多数美国医学院基础技能课程的核心目标的问题。虽然医学教育者已经引入了一些专注于移情培养的教育活动,但学生们花很少的时间来获得特定的关键沟通能力,如听力。医学院的教职员工写过关于同理心的重要性的文章,但他们并没有利用真正定义同理心倾听的研究,也没有将注意力转移到如何教授这些技能上。在缺乏将积极倾听作为一种治疗微技能的指导下,接受培训的医生不太可能始终如一地做出口头反应,让患者感到他们被倾听和理解。因此,医学生可能有沟通缺陷,包括无法与病人建立有意义的关系。这种困境之所以持续,是因为大多数内科教师没有回过头来借鉴人际敏感性训练的先前模式,也没有跨越医学院课程之外的学科界限,综合心理学和传播学的课程。这是有问题的,因为与患者建立有意义的关系已被证明可以改善结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Listening
International Journal of Listening Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
CORRELATIONS BETWEEN INNATE AND ENVIRONMENTAL TRAITS AND THE ATTITUDES` ASSESSMENT TOWARD ACTIVE LISTENING AMONG EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATORS LISTENING TO BOOKS’ DURING THE PANDEMIC: EXAMINING THE USES AND GRATIFICATIONS OF AUDIOBOOK LISTENING RHETORICAL LISTENING AS A PEDAGOGICAL TOOL IN HIGHER EDUCATION: EXPLORING THE BLACK PETE DEBATE IN FLANDERS RHETORICAL LISTENING AS A PEDAGOGICAL TOOL IN HIGHER EDUCATION: EXPLORING THE BLACK PETE DEBATE IN FLANDERS INVESTIGATING THE ROLE OF RESPONSE FORMAT IN COMPUTER-BASED LECTURE COMPREHENSION TASKS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1