The Immediate and Delayed Effect of Dynamic Assessment Approaches on EFL Learners’ Oral Narrative Performance and Anxiety

IF 2.1 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Educational Assessment Pub Date : 2019-02-13 DOI:10.1080/10627197.2019.1578169
Masoomeh Estaji, Mahsa Farahanynia
{"title":"The Immediate and Delayed Effect of Dynamic Assessment Approaches on EFL Learners’ Oral Narrative Performance and Anxiety","authors":"Masoomeh Estaji, Mahsa Farahanynia","doi":"10.1080/10627197.2019.1578169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The present study aimed to investigate the effect of two major approaches of Dynamic Assessment, namely, interventionist and interactionist approaches, on learners’ oral narrative performance and anxiety. To this end, 34 Iranian EFL learners were assigned to an Interactionist Group (InA.G) and Interventionist Group (InV.G). Initially, both groups were given the Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety Scale and a pretest of speaking. In the treatment phase, the InV.G was asked to narrate a video and received instructions on their errors. The InA.G narrated the video while being provided with scaffolding during narration. Then both groups were given a posttest and, two weeks later, a delayed posttest. The results indicated that both groups’ oral performance significantly increased, while their anxiety reduced. In the end, a semi-structured interview was conducted whose results revealed that the InA.G experienced more anxiety mostly due to feeling a sense of interruption and losing face.","PeriodicalId":46209,"journal":{"name":"Educational Assessment","volume":"24 1","pages":"135 - 154"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10627197.2019.1578169","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2019.1578169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

ABSTRACT The present study aimed to investigate the effect of two major approaches of Dynamic Assessment, namely, interventionist and interactionist approaches, on learners’ oral narrative performance and anxiety. To this end, 34 Iranian EFL learners were assigned to an Interactionist Group (InA.G) and Interventionist Group (InV.G). Initially, both groups were given the Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety Scale and a pretest of speaking. In the treatment phase, the InV.G was asked to narrate a video and received instructions on their errors. The InA.G narrated the video while being provided with scaffolding during narration. Then both groups were given a posttest and, two weeks later, a delayed posttest. The results indicated that both groups’ oral performance significantly increased, while their anxiety reduced. In the end, a semi-structured interview was conducted whose results revealed that the InA.G experienced more anxiety mostly due to feeling a sense of interruption and losing face.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
动态评估方法对英语学习者口语叙事表现和焦虑的直接和延迟影响
摘要本研究旨在探讨动态评估的两种主要方法,即干预主义和互动主义方法对学习者口头叙事表现和焦虑的影响。为此,34名伊朗英语学习者被分配到互动组(InA.G)和干预组(invg)。最初,两组人都接受了外语课堂焦虑量表和口语预测。在治疗阶段,他们被要求解说一段视频,并接受关于他们错误的指导。艾娜。G在旁白的时候用脚手架进行解说。然后两组都进行了后测,两周后进行了延迟后测。结果表明,两组患者的口腔表现均显著提高,焦虑程度有所降低。最后,我们进行了一次半结构化的访谈,结果显示:G更焦虑,主要是因为有被打断的感觉和丢面子的感觉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Educational Assessment
Educational Assessment EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Educational Assessment publishes original research and scholarship on the assessment of individuals, groups, and programs in educational settings. It includes theory, methodological approaches and empirical research in the appraisal of the learning and achievement of students and teachers, young children and adults, and novices and experts. The journal reports on current large-scale testing practices, discusses alternative approaches, presents scholarship on classroom assessment practices and includes assessment topics debated at the national level. It welcomes both conceptual and empirical pieces and encourages articles that provide a strong bridge between theory and/or empirical research and the implications for educational policy and/or practice.
期刊最新文献
Dialect and Mathematics Performance in African American Children Who Use AAE: Insights from Explanatory IRT and Error Analysis Raising the Bar: How Revising an English Language Proficiency Assessment for Initial English Learner Classification Affects Students’ Later Academic Achievements Monitoring Rater Quality in Observational Systems: Issues Due to Unreliable Estimates of Rater Quality Improving the Precision of Classroom Observation Scores Using a Multi-Rater and Multi-Timepoint Item Response Theory Model High Stakes Assessments in Primary Schools and Teachers’ Anxiety About Work
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1